Form: Argument

  • Why not? What’s the difference between a jury against an individual for direct c

    Why not? What’s the difference between a jury against an individual for direct crimes and a vote against an ideology for indirect crimes at scale? The point is that all leftism is criminal – all of it – as well as advocacy for it, lawfare and propaganda to implement it, and the abuse of institutions to persecute those trying to stop it.

    Trump saved you. We were headed for civil war and hanging trees filled with all of your criminals of indirect crimes.

    Reply addressees: @protanope @whstancil


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-22 00:51:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881867248467632128

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881865221234675844

  • We all have the right to voluntary disassociation – it’s only the government tha

    We all have the right to voluntary disassociation – it’s only the government that must be blind to our differences. And even then only the court and legislature.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 23:06:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881840749203034171

    Reply addressees: @cenkuygur

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881816317717848351

  • Federal Ownership Does Not Mean Federal Management: It means Federal INVESTMENT

    Federal Ownership Does Not Mean Federal Management:
    It means Federal INVESTMENT in R&D, in Expansion, in Preservation in exchange for returns that reduce taxes where financial markets cannot appear to concentrate capital on their own because of either risk, or time to obtain returns.
    Today we do a great deal of publicly funded R&D, particularly in sciences and in the military, and the government does not retain any interest in the results of that investment.
    Why shouldn’t that capital contribution be accounted for so that the burden of taxation was lifted on the population, and the organization of capital on longer term interests instead of on costly consumer credit?

    Reply addressees: @CloudByter


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 20:32:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881439667889020928

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881438659154477293

  • No one is justifying anything except what is intended by the republic: a market

    No one is justifying anything except what is intended by the republic: a market competition for influence. The fact that different sets of elites rotate in and out is a feature of continuous adaptation. It’s the noisest political system doing the most dirty laundry in pubic, but it still works better than the rest by adapting to that rotation of elites rather than calsifying on ‘bad emperors’ as in china and russia, or ‘bad priests’ as in iran.
    What you’re saying is you don’t want to have to compete in the market for influence.
    Because you’d lose.

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @Lord__Sousa


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 20:13:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881434871618486272

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881434133949550643

  • A european federations means france rules the rest of you. That’s what it means.

    A european federations means france rules the rest of you. That’s what it means. What has france done to preserve europe? Nothing. Theyve done the opposite. And they still maintain their colonial empire.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-19 02:45:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880808650534760662

    Reply addressees: @time_for_ef

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880634084906713442

  • In my work I propose ‘full accounting’ by a balance sheet of all demonstrated in

    In my work I propose ‘full accounting’ by a balance sheet of all demonstrated interests whether personal, common, informal or formal. This narrows the difference between that which can be forecast, that which can be speculated upon, and that which is a privilege of preference.

    Again you fail to make an argument by failing to define terms, failing to define causality, and claiming private knowledge, by use of private language.

    I mean, I realize you’re not terribly bright but you might learn something from the feedback.

    Technically, the technique of deception you’re using is relatively consistent. And terribly feminine. Which is of course why you are attracted to the feminine: you can’t compete in the masculine so you have to claim oppression as a means of self victimization and appeal to morals you don’t share.

    Reply addressees: @EmbitteredThe @TheSovereignMD @nayibbukele @TyrantsMuse


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 20:33:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880352876918370307

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880343050553290951



    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EmbitteredThe @TheSovereignMD @nayibbukele @TyrantsMuse You’re just lying now.
    You asked. I answered. In detail. If there exists any error in there you’re welcome to assert one – but you haven’t because you can’t, because you have no idea what you’re talking about. 😉

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1880343050553290951

  • Workers are not competent either empirically or theoretically to manage organiza

    Workers are not competent either empirically or theoretically to manage organizations at scale.

    Here is a rough estimation of IQ ranges based on empirical data and observed social structures:

    1. Unskilled Labor and Marginal Participation
    IQ Range: ~70–90
    Characteristics: Limited ability to manage complexity, often performing routine or repetitive tasks.
    Employment in roles requiring low cognitive engagement and minimal decision-making.
    Conscientiousness plays a minor role, as opportunities for upward mobility are constrained by cognitive limits.
    Occupations: Manual labor, basic service roles.

    2. Semi-Skilled and Skilled Labor
    IQ Range: ~90–105
    Characteristics: Capable of managing moderately complex tasks and adapting to structured environments.
    Conscientiousness becomes more influential, especially for reliability and adherence to procedures.
    Often engaged in roles requiring some technical training or experience.
    Occupations: Technicians, tradespeople, administrative staff.

    3. Lower Middle Class (Supervisory Roles, Small Business Owners)
    IQ Range: ~105–115
    Characteristics: Able to oversee and coordinate resources and processes with some degree of independence.
    Higher conscientiousness significantly increases success within this range, especially for reliability and diligence in management.
    Occupations require both technical and interpersonal skills.
    Occupations: Managers, skilled trades with entrepreneurial components, junior professionals.

    4. Middle Class (Professionals and Managers)
    IQ Range: ~115–125
    Characteristics:Comfortable handling abstract reasoning and planning, often in specialized fields.
    Conscientiousness amplifies productivity and reliability, facilitating career advancement.
    Roles involve significant decision-making and problem-solving under moderately high complexity.
    Occupations: Engineers, lawyers, mid-level executives, senior professionals.

    5. Upper Middle Class (Senior Professionals, Executives)
    IQ Range: ~125–135
    Characteristics:High ability to manage large-scale complexity, including systems, networks, and organizational hierarchies.
    Conscientiousness is critical for consistency and dependability in high-stakes decision-making.
    Frequently engaged in roles requiring strategic thinking and leadership.
    Occupations: Senior executives, top-level consultants, high-achieving academics.

    6. Upper Class (Innovators, Leaders, Large-Scale Decision-Makers)
    IQ Range: ~135–160+
    Characteristics:Exceptional capacity for abstraction, innovation, and systematization of novel solutions.
    Conscientiousness remains crucial but often takes a secondary role to creativity, vision, and intellectual engagement.
    Operate in roles shaping industries, ideologies, and long-term strategies for society.
    Occupations: Thought leaders, major entrepreneurs, influential policymakers.

    Conscientiousness as a Within-Class Differentiator

    While IQ provides the cognitive foundation for handling complexity, conscientiousness influences:

    Work Ethic: Persistence, reliability, and attention to detail.
    Adaptability: Responsiveness to feedback and continuous self-improvement.
    Social Integration: Ability to navigate networks and maintain relationships critical for upward mobility.

    Individuals with higher conscientiousness within a given IQ range often achieve disproportionately higher status or income relative to less conscientious peers.

    Reply addressees: @EmbitteredThe @TheSovereignMD @nayibbukele @TyrantsMuse


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 17:36:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880308158561939457

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880306433402757426

  • Quite the opposite. I am correct. All human differences derive from sex differen

    Quite the opposite. I am correct. All human differences derive from sex differences. All sex differences derive from responsibility differences.
    GIVEN
    Sex Differences in Cognition:
    Feminine vs Masculine
    Prey vs Predator
    In Time vs Over Time
    Empathizing vs Systematizing… https://t.co/apw3XgoDkj


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-14 04:42:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879026320245661712

    Reply addressees: @strichtarn @whstancil

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1878992196378263752

  • Quite the opposite. I am correct. All human differences derive from sex differen

    Quite the opposite. I am correct. All human differences derive from sex differences. All sex differences derive from responsibility differences.
    GIVEN
    Sex Differences in Cognition:
    Feminine vs Masculine
    Prey vs Predator
    In Time vs Over Time
    Empathizing vs Systematizing
    Consuming vs Capitalizing
    Irresponsibility vs Responsibility
    Devotion vs Loyalty
    Small Scale vs Large Scale
    Herd vs Packs
    Global vs National
    Dysgenic vs Eugenic
    Devolutionary vs Evolutionary
    Left (parasitic) vs Right (productive)
    AND GIVEN
    Sex Differences in Limits:
    Masculine: There is a limit to what responsibility I can bear.
    –vs–
    Feminine: There is no limit to the consumption I can bear.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-14 04:42:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879026320136675328

  • How do you maintain low (long) time preference without aristocracy? You must hav

    How do you maintain low (long) time preference without aristocracy? You must have aristocracy because they will naturally emerge as and evolve an aristocracy with low (long) time preference if lawfulness is preserved vs lawlessness. Without their time preference all polities, and especially democratic polities, will eventually burn capital in favor of consumption, whether by individualism instead of familism, consumerism instead of commons-ism, corruption instead of nationalism. The financialization drove recursive shortening of time preference, and the destruction of civilizational capital. There are many lessons here, but the prohibition on credit expansion in the private sector is the principle means of preventing it, and instead, forcing invsetment in longer time preferences instead of shorter consumer and consumption preferences.

    (Brad and I today.)


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-13 00:11:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1878595620476485632