—“Women are devoted, and men are loyal. There’s a difference.”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 11:13:00 UTC
—“Women are devoted, and men are loyal. There’s a difference.”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 11:13:00 UTC
—“Tolerance is not a moral absolute; it is a peace treaty. Tolerance is a social norm because it allows different people to live side-by-side without being at each other’s throats. It means that we accept that people may be different from us, in their customs, in their behavior, in their dress, in their sex lives, and that if this doesn’t directly affect our lives, it is none of our business. But the model of a peace treaty differs from the model of a moral precept in one simple way: the protection of a peace treaty only extends to those willing to abide by its terms. It is an agreement to live in peace, not an agreement to be peaceful no matter the conduct of others. A peace treaty is not a suicide pact.”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 10:40:00 UTC
women choose. women choose what they understand. women must learn to understand what is good, not what is familiar.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 00:09:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993281579207229441
Read and Lift Something Heavy Every Day.
This is still my favorite man-quote.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 00:08:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993281288726634496
women choose. men must choose not to choose poorly from those that choose them.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 00:01:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993279585247727617
women choose. women choose what they understand. women must learn to understand what is good, not what is familiar.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-06 20:09:00 UTC
Read and Lift Something Heavy Every Day.
This is still my favorite man-quote.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-06 20:07:00 UTC
women choose. men must choose not to choose poorly from those that choose them.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-06 20:01:00 UTC
Man is wired (evolved) to know what is in his interests, what will cause retaliation, and what will purchase options on future cooperation, and that he must punish cheaters(defectors). It’s just in our interests, increasingly, to act morally, because of the returns on moral cooperation, but if you look at history and if you look at the total absence outside of western civilizatino of high trust other than perhaps japane (which sacrifices truth for it), then the answer is just the opposite. If I accomplish anything I hope to eradictate is christian/rousseauian/feminine fantasy that man is wired for morality. Man evolved to be eminently practical: the act predatorially, parasiticlaly, reciproccally, and to invest, as opportunity presents itself. We are just an extension of the laws of physics, and our only difference is the ability to use memory to keep accounting of whether we’re gaining or losing over time in an environment of possible cooperation.
It is just as hard to deny allies the familiar safe grounds of self destruction than to move them to unfamiliar grounds of survival. Unfortunately the work of the creative theorist includes denying well intentioned fools of otherwise good character, refuge in the familiar but self destructive. In this way we move people into new choices as much by denying them defection as we do by presenting them with opportunities for persistence.