Curt Doolittle

Form: Aphorism

  • agency, truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, heroism, duty, and markets in everythin

    agency, truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, heroism, duty, and markets in everything.

    agency, truth,

    sovereignty, reciprocity,

    heroism, duty,

    and markets in everything.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-21 08:37:00 UTC

  • It’s because I don’t do symbolism, I don’t do utilitarianism, I don’t do pragmat

    It’s because I don’t do symbolism, I don’t do utilitarianism, I don’t do pragmatism, I do truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, heroism, duty, and markets in everything. Why? There is more to a polity than money and property. It is our commons that are our competitive advantage.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-21 08:21:00 UTC

  • Debates are only as valuable as the intellectual ability and honesty of the peop

    Debates are only as valuable as the intellectual ability and honesty of the people debating.

    Conversations are better.

    In my experience arguments that consist of a series of steps rather than a simple contrast require writing.

    We can FEEL contrasts but we must REASON deductions.

    The reason we have difficulty with most big questions is that they must be reasoned not felt.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-21 07:26:00 UTC

  • (Bait and Ban. Works Flawlessly.)

    (Bait and Ban. Works Flawlessly.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-21 02:15:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998386694952022016

  • The problem is that we all want to ‘lie a bit’ and promote our individual strate

    The problem is that we all want to ‘lie a bit’ and promote our individual strategy over the Group’s and the Groups over Evolutionary Necessity: Mankind.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-21 01:36:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998376985368973313

    Reply addressees: @KialoHQ

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/998376779592200193

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @KialoHQ 1) Moral Objectivity = Reciprocity:Natural Law(of Tort) independent of individual or group opinion.
    2) Moral Norms = Portfolios of rights and duties resulting in reciprocity within the group survival strategy.
    3) Moral Bias = Expression of gender and class reproductive strategy.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/998376779592200193

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @KialoHQ 1) Moral Objectivity = Reciprocity:Natural Law(of Tort) independent of individual or group opinion.
    2) Moral Norms = Portfolios of rights and duties resulting in reciprocity within the group survival strategy.
    3) Moral Bias = Expression of gender and class reproductive strategy.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/998376779592200193

  • No, Philosophy(choice) Is Subordinate to Science (truth)

    Again, economics and law, defeat philosophy, religious tradition, and moral justificationism. Demonstrated vs Reported. Always and everywhere. —“Philosophy is more fundamental than economics. The notion of making choices, based on rewards and punishment, implies some form of ethics, which itself is a branch of philosophy. Economics is not a floating abstract, disconnected from ethics or philosophy.”— Mark Goodkin It’s actually just physics. Morality=reciprocity, an reciprocity is the only system of measurement a cooperative species can use and survive. Philosophy allows us to choose preferences, but truth and falsehood are in the domain of science. Historically this relationship was mistakenly reversed because it threatened the status quo. Philosophy(middle class) like religion (underclass) is just the record of dissatisfaction: opposition literature. The ruling class rules, and they rule by law, and law and economics require reciprocity to fund the requirements for maintaining power. Science has a great track record. Philosophy has very arguable (if not certainly) done more harm than good. And theology has certainly done more harm than all but malaria and the black plague.
    May 21, 2018 11:59am

  • There Is No Neutral Territory for Gods

    The strong do not start from the position of equality, or of desire for cooperation, but from the presumption that either you and yours create value via a productive exchange, or one’s you and yours are better punished, enserfed, enslaved, imprisoned, or killed. We deprive enemies of boycott. Either trade productively or die. Otherwise you are consuming the world’s resources which could be put to better use. Once you undrestand that our presumption is between extermination, enslavement, or productive exchange, you understand the folly of leaving open the option for boycott, resistance, or parasitism. There is no neutral territory for gods.

  • There Is No Neutral Territory for Gods

    The strong do not start from the position of equality, or of desire for cooperation, but from the presumption that either you and yours create value via a productive exchange, or one’s you and yours are better punished, enserfed, enslaved, imprisoned, or killed. We deprive enemies of boycott. Either trade productively or die. Otherwise you are consuming the world’s resources which could be put to better use. Once you undrestand that our presumption is between extermination, enslavement, or productive exchange, you understand the folly of leaving open the option for boycott, resistance, or parasitism. There is no neutral territory for gods.

  • (Bait and Ban. Works Flawlessly.)

    (Bait and Ban. Works Flawlessly.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 22:15:00 UTC

  • “Intolerance is the most masculine virtue one can have.”—Bashar Al Stedman (ev

    —“Intolerance is the most masculine virtue one can have.”—Bashar Al Stedman

    (every man a sheriff)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-20 18:52:00 UTC