WHAT HAPPENED IS WHAT THEY INTENDED TO HAPPEN: DEVOLUTION
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 07:41:00 UTC
Form: Aphorism
-
Violence is the only answer. It is the least expensive, fastest, most certain an
Violence is the only answer. It is the least expensive, fastest, most certain answer, with the most dependable consequences.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 23:59:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020095802839126016
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. Violence is the only answer. It is the least
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Violence is the only answer. It is the least expensive, fastest, most certain answer, with the most dependable consequences.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 23:59:12 UTC
-
Violence is the only answer. It is the least expensive, fastest, most certain an
Violence is the only answer. It is the least expensive, fastest, most certain answer, with the most dependable consequences.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 19:59:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. (repost) Cities = Markets = Decreased Opportu
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(repost)
Cities = Markets = Decreased Opportunity Cost. It’s the ability to communicate that decreases opportunity cost.
Opportunity cost = increasing choices. The question is whether increasing choices produces increasing outcomes.
For business it does. For genes it does not. This is the fundamental problem. Cities Destroy Genes in exchange for lower opportunity costs of consumption.
So we have a choice: (a) continue to bring people to capital at the cost of genes (genetic capital), or (b) bring capital to people to preserve genetic capital.
In other words, redistribute the opportunity costs.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 16:47:55 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. ELIMINATION OF OF THE BAD CREATES THE GOOD Th
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
ELIMINATION OF OF THE BAD CREATES THE GOOD
Think of it this way: most of our work as a species is eliminating ignorance, bias, and error: “The Dark Forces of Time and Ignorance”.
But it’s profitable to create deceptions. So not only are we working against our evolutionary history – our perception of the world anthropomorphically, at human scale, and in our interest – but that we are are working against those who cannot or will not compete by reciprocity, truth, and duty.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 14:37:40 UTC
-
(repost) Cities = Markets = Decreased Opportunity Cost. It’s the ability to comm
(repost)
Cities = Markets = Decreased Opportunity Cost. It’s the ability to communicate that decreases opportunity cost.
Opportunity cost = increasing choices. The question is whether increasing choices produces increasing outcomes.
For business it does. For genes it does not. This is the fundamental problem. Cities Destroy Genes in exchange for lower opportunity costs of consumption.
So we have a choice: (a) continue to bring people to capital at the cost of genes (genetic capital), or (b) bring capital to people to preserve genetic capital.
In other words, redistribute the opportunity costs.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 12:47:00 UTC
-
We don’t need to increase our rates of reproduction so much as separate. Separat
We don’t need to increase our rates of reproduction so much as separate. Separation will provide the economic and cultural incentive to maintain population.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 11:31:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019907518879993857
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. We don’t need to increase our rates of reprod
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
We don’t need to increase our rates of reproduction so much as separate. Separation will provide the economic and cultural incentive to maintain population.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 11:31:06 UTC
-
ELIMINATION OF OF THE BAD CREATES THE GOOD Think of it this way: most of our wor
ELIMINATION OF OF THE BAD CREATES THE GOOD
Think of it this way: most of our work as a species is eliminating ignorance, bias, and error: “The Dark Forces of Time and Ignorance”.
But it’s profitable to create deceptions. So not only are we working against our evolutionary history – our perception of the world anthropomorphically, at human scale, and in our interest – but that we are are working against those who cannot or will not compete by reciprocity, truth, and duty.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 10:37:00 UTC