[T]he strong start from the position of inequality, and the utility of slavery, productive serfdom, financial serfdom, political serfdom. The market simply produces greater returns for the strong, largely in the reduction of costs of policing the slaves and serfs, since they self police in order to maintain access to consumption; and in the much higher productivity of the serfs due to the incentive to produce to control their levels of consumption. The weak start from the false premise of equality. And all deductions are false from that premise forward. The production of markets is in the interests of the strong. The production of relative inequality is in the intersets of the strong. Only a militia is free, because only a militia is equal in ownership of the market.
Form: Aphorism
-
Don’t complain about people following incentives, and specifically don’t ask peo
Don’t complain about people following incentives, and specifically don’t ask people to believe in a presumed good rather than exploit a possible incentive.
Change the incentives.
The more you subsidize something the more you will get.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-14 14:57:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1040615611133566976
-
Don’t complain about people following incentives, and specifically don’t ask peo
Don’t complain about people following incentives, and specifically don’t ask people to believe in a presumed good rather than exploit a possible incentive.
Change the incentives.
The more you subsidize something the more you will get.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-14 10:57:00 UTC
-
September 14th, 2018 10:57 AM [D]on’t complain about people following incentives
September 14th, 2018 10:57 AM [D]on’t complain about people following incentives, and specifically don’t ask people to believe in a presumed good rather than exploit a possible incentive. Change the incentives. The more you subsidize something the more you will get.
-
September 14th, 2018 10:21 AM [Y]ou have to understand. It is not in a woman’s i
September 14th, 2018 10:21 AM
[Y]ou have to understand. It is not in a woman’s interest to limit her consumption – particularly of attention and liberty – when men are no longer necessary. The question is then how do we re-empower men so that they have the same freedom? Retained earnings.
-
September 14th, 2018 10:17 AM [W]e can’t reinstitute monogamy , only end subsidy
September 14th, 2018 10:17 AM
[W]e can’t reinstitute monogamy, only end subsidy and malincentive, and produce status, tax, and rights incentives. Monogamy will return to the majority in whose interest it is, and not for that minority in whose interest it is not. In practice this will mean that reproductively desirable will restore reproduction and those others shall not.
-
September 14th, 2018 9:23 AM —“Women invented rent seeking. It’s their reprodu
September 14th, 2018 9:23 AM
—“Women invented rent seeking. It’s their reproductive strategy – to force their costs and the costs of their offspring on the tribe. Working to control some of her income. Hiring other women to raise her children. Marrying the state to bypass the cost of maintenance of a male. Extracting rents from a baby-daddy without the costs of attention, affection, sex, and caretaking, is not only in their interest, its the optimum strategy for maximizing rent in pursuit of consumption. It’s entirely rational. We have produced all the incentives necessary for her to maximize rents.”—
😉
-
September 14th, 2018 10:57 AM [D]on’t complain about people following incentives
September 14th, 2018 10:57 AM [D]on’t complain about people following incentives, and specifically don’t ask people to believe in a presumed good rather than exploit a possible incentive. Change the incentives. The more you subsidize something the more you will get.
-
September 14th, 2018 10:21 AM [Y]ou have to understand. It is not in a woman’s i
September 14th, 2018 10:21 AM
[Y]ou have to understand. It is not in a woman’s interest to limit her consumption – particularly of attention and liberty – when men are no longer necessary. The question is then how do we re-empower men so that they have the same freedom? Retained earnings.
-
They are disappointed. Disasters are profit opportunities. Malincentives drive n
They are disappointed. Disasters are profit opportunities. Malincentives drive news.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-13 21:36:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1040353640664522752
Reply addressees: @jokebot_01
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1040353355451846657
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1040353355451846657