Curt Doolittle

Form: Aphorism

  • We are the only gods. The vast majority of us are just afraid to accept the resp

    We are the only gods. The vast majority of us are just afraid to accept the responsibility.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 17:57:00 UTC

  • There is no wisdom literature that is not false, that cannot be broken in to ope

    There is no wisdom literature that is not false, that cannot be broken in to operational, fully accounted language.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 17:43:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM: The Power to Deny Power

    PROPERTARIANISM: The Power to Deny Power.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 16:24:00 UTC

  • I TOLD YOU SO… A Moral License A Set of Demands A Means of Transition A Method

    I TOLD YOU SO…

    A Moral License

    A Set of Demands

    A Means of Transition

    A Method of altering the status quo.

    Welcome to the revolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 16:23:00 UTC

  • CONVERTING PHILOSOPHY INTO SCIENCE (worth repeating) Philosophy can be laundered

    CONVERTING PHILOSOPHY INTO SCIENCE

    (worth repeating)

    Philosophy can be laundered such that philosophizing (imaginary and verbal) and theorizing (existential and actionable) are essentially identical, by the use of:

    1) operational language,

    2) the full accounting of costs, and

    3) declaring the method of decidability in the choice of preferences and goods as those of:

    … (a) the feminine equalitarian herd (dysgenic), or

    … (b) the masculine hierarchical pack (merit).

    However, if you do that you will end up with the natural law by selecting 3b, and a network of excuses and lies by selecting 3a.

    You can’t get out of it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 12:53:00 UTC

  • USING LOGIC IS WESTERN BECAUSE WESTERNERS ACCOUNT FOR COSTS. —“Now, I’ve spent

    USING LOGIC IS WESTERN BECAUSE WESTERNERS ACCOUNT FOR COSTS.

    —“Now, I’ve spent a lot of time on it, but you have to ask yourself, why, if mathematical, logical, empirical, operational, rational, reciprocal, arguments with tests of scope, completeness, and coherence exist, why it would be that you would argue by any other means.”—- CD

    —“bUt UsInG lOgIc Is ToO wEsTeRn”– Rosenborg Predmetsky

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 10:14:00 UTC

  • Those who will fight matter. Incentives to fight matter. A set of demands (const

    Those who will fight matter. Incentives to fight matter. A set of demands (constitution) that provides incentives, and satisfies demand, matters. Internet dweebs are negatively correlated with those who will fight. Uninformed opinion negatively correlated with calculus of motive.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-09 23:55:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083150214083559429

  • Adolph spent a lot of time speaking in beer halls and adapting his manner method

    Adolph spent a lot of time speaking in beer halls and adapting his manner method and content.

    The Beatles spent a lot of time playing in germany and adapting their style, method, and content.

    These are two ends of the spectrum of 10k hours.

    There is no substitute for continuous market testing.

    There is no substitute for testing your arguments.

    Welcome to the revolution…

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-07 08:43:00 UTC

  • The Secret to Teaching Men: Exhaustive King of The Hill.

    [T]eaching men is really easy: Bait them into dominance play. Just as exhaustive forgiveness in tit-for-tat is the optimum cooperative strategy, exhaustive baiting for dominance play is the optimum MALE cooperative strategy. WTF do you think shit-talking amounts to? Are you fking thick? (See what I did there?) Set up King of the Hill games where ANY forward progress gets the men recognition. Do not criticize failure, only cowardice, attention seeking, or time wasting. If you are too predictable you will ruin the game. You must present a variety of challenges. We cannot feel ‘good’ about learning by conformity the way girls and women do. We must play at fighting or it’s not worth our time.

  • The Secret to Teaching Men: Exhaustive King of The Hill.

    [T]eaching men is really easy: Bait them into dominance play. Just as exhaustive forgiveness in tit-for-tat is the optimum cooperative strategy, exhaustive baiting for dominance play is the optimum MALE cooperative strategy. WTF do you think shit-talking amounts to? Are you fking thick? (See what I did there?) Set up King of the Hill games where ANY forward progress gets the men recognition. Do not criticize failure, only cowardice, attention seeking, or time wasting. If you are too predictable you will ruin the game. You must present a variety of challenges. We cannot feel ‘good’ about learning by conformity the way girls and women do. We must play at fighting or it’s not worth our time.