The possible: Engineering
The good: Philosophy
The true: Law
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-12 15:56:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1105497898438012928
The possible: Engineering
The good: Philosophy
The true: Law
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-12 15:56:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1105497898438012928
The possible: Engineering
The good: Philosophy
The true: Law
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-12 11:56:00 UTC
Surviving Asia In Two Words: “Situational Awareness”.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-11 20:01:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1105197066102267904
Surviving Asia In Two Words: “Situational Awareness”.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-11 16:01:00 UTC
Thought I have been working with:
“Any argument, theory, definition, should be incomprehensible until it is only comprehensible without error.”
Regarding:
—“1. Objective truth (what is, something generally agreed we can never โbe completely sure ofโ, but as a concept Peterson certainly does believe this exists);
2. scientific truth (our best guess through the scientific method, at attainment of some constrained resolution of objective truth); and
3. pragmatic truth (verification of a bounded hypothesis adjusted by feedback, which Peterson agrees has all sorts of precision limitations).”—
I handle this by dropping the term truth, and adopting decidability. Such that truth remains what it is, and we are seeking decidability sufficient for market demand.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-11 11:06:00 UTC
Break the Cycle.
Nationalism.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-09 21:55:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1104500926562197504
Break the Cycle.
Nationalism.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-09 16:54:00 UTC
WE CAN”T LOSE
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-09 15:38:00 UTC
SOCIAL SCIENCE IN ONE IMAGE
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-09 13:35:00 UTC
Counter-signaling without (a) alternative and (b) where cowardice (externalization of costs of liberty) and (c) waiting for someone else to solve the problem ASIDE – the only test is the test itself. We shall see. ๐ I’ll bet my test ‘effort’ against your ‘faith” in ‘conversion’.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 18:52:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103730032999124996
Reply addressees: @Nick_B_Steves
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103695570676469761
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable โ we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103695570676469761