I don’t deal with should. I deal with true, false, and undecidable.
Unfortunately, abysmally ignorant, profoundly stupid, and utterly incompetent people can vote under universal franchise democracy, and we no longer have houses for the classes that demonstrate our abilities. 😉
Reply addressees: @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness
Form: Aphorism
-
I don’t deal with should. I deal with true, false, and undecidable. Unfortunatel
-
It is in the nature of men, and especially conservative men, who are system thin
It is in the nature of men, and especially conservative men, who are system thinkers to rely less on others and more on our own reasoning, and worse, on ‘private reasoning’ and this creates an artificial sense of low numbers. The liberals are a tiny loud perecentage.
Reply addressees: @Salamandrens @yat_es @Outsideness -
It is in the nature of men, and especially conservative men, who are system thin
It is in the nature of men, and especially conservative men, who are system thinkers to rely less on others and more on our own reasoning, and worse, on ‘private reasoning’ and this creates an artificial sense of low numbers. The liberals are a tiny loud perecentage.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 00:49:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271605633104646146
Reply addressees: @Salamandrens @yat_es @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271586044471894016
-
If I want to write analytically I can make your eyes bleed. If I want to explain
If I want to write analytically I can make your eyes bleed. If I want to explain causality I can make your ears bleed. If I want to get a message across quickly, the aphorism or epigram does us better service. I know when to use each. Follow me and you’ll see the consistency. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-12 17:01:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271487859833389064
Reply addressees: @Salamandrens @yat_es @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271477067859800064
-
If I want to write analytically I can make your eyes bleed. If I want to explain
If I want to write analytically I can make your eyes bleed. If I want to explain causality I can make your ears bleed. If I want to get a message across quickly, the aphorism or epigram does us better service. I know when to use each. Follow me and you’ll see the consistency. 😉
Reply addressees: @Salamandrens @yat_es @Outsideness -
There is only one source of sovereignty(aristocracy) and it’s imitations of libe
There is only one source of sovereignty(aristocracy) and it’s imitations of liberty(middle class) and freedom (working class), and that is the Natural Law of the European Peoples, and the Militia to Deny Alternatives to others.
Full anti-ancap argument:
https://propertarianism.com/2018/05/01/economic-intuitionism-or-scientific-praxeology/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-12 13:36:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271436270431096832
Reply addressees: @all0invain
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271433668368744452
-
There is only one source of sovereignty(aristocracy) and it’s imitations of libe
There is only one source of sovereignty(aristocracy) and it’s imitations of liberty(middle class) and freedom (working class), and that is the Natural Law of the European Peoples, and the Militia to Deny Alternatives to others.
Full anti-ancap argument:
https://t.co/iK27cjAmRW
Reply addressees: @all0invain -
False promise baiting the well meaning into hazard by suggestion. It’s the jewis
False promise baiting the well meaning into hazard by suggestion. It’s the jewish ethics of the ghetto, pale of settlement. Just as marxism undermines by false promise of underclass monopoly, libertarianism/ancapism for ascendent males, and neoconservative for upper caste: fraud.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-12 13:34:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271435732289236993
Reply addressees: @all0invain
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271433668368744452
-
False promise baiting the well meaning into hazard by suggestion. It’s the jewis
False promise baiting the well meaning into hazard by suggestion. It’s the jewish ethics of the ghetto, pale of settlement. Just as marxism undermines by false promise of underclass monopoly, libertarianism/ancapism for ascendent males, and neoconservative for upper caste: fraud.
Reply addressees: @all0invain -
If you choose sovereignty that requires adversarialism, and adversarialism produ
If you choose sovereignty that requires adversarialism, and adversarialism produces trifunctionalism, and tri-fuctionalism produces left-emotional-religious+literary, center-rational-philosophical+legal, and right-empirical-scientific+military elites in continuous competition preventing stagnation and decline, since there is always another elite to defect to that will replace the failed elites.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-12 11:51:00 UTC