Rule of Law is what’s important. Only the British empire ever had it. Only Americans ever formalized it. And Britain’s didn’t survive the emancipation of 1858, and American’s didn’t survive the postwar invasion. It takes one generation for the enemy within to destroy rule of law.
Reply addressees: @RealityRelate
Form: Aphorism
-
Rule of Law is what’s important. Only the British empire ever had it. Only Ameri
-
Rule of Law is what’s important. Only the British empire ever had it. Only Ameri
Rule of Law is what’s important. Only the British empire ever had it. Only Americans ever formalized it. And Britain’s didn’t survive the emancipation of 1858, and American’s didn’t survive the postwar invasion. It takes one generation for the enemy within to destroy rule of law.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 23:11:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292961831766589449
Reply addressees: @RealityRelate
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292945042726965255
-
Watch what women do not what they say. What they say merely signals conformity t
Watch what women do not what they say. What they say merely signals conformity to her group. What they do is consistent regardless of what they say. AFAIK current relationship issues are due to desocialization of males and insulation of females from male adversarialism.
Reply addressees: @Zen_niks @DegenRolf -
Watch what women do not what they say. What they say merely signals conformity t
Watch what women do not what they say. What they say merely signals conformity to her group. What they do is consistent regardless of what they say. AFAIK current relationship issues are due to desocialization of males and insulation of females from male adversarialism.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 22:05:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292945089371746304
Reply addressees: @Zen_niks @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292933086745726976
-
Noticeable not meaningful (a) Women are treated with privilege, are coddled and
Noticeable not meaningful
(a) Women are treated with privilege, are coddled and receive much more attention. M->F feeds attention demands.
(b) Women are unconscious of how ‘disposably’ men are treated (by both). F->M may increase credibility but at cost of attention and coddling.
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf -
Noticeable not meaningful (a) Women are treated with privilege, are coddled and
Noticeable not meaningful
(a) Women are treated with privilege, are coddled and receive much more attention. M->F feeds attention demands.
(b) Women are unconscious of how ‘disposably’ men are treated (by both). F->M may increase credibility but at cost of attention and coddling.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 17:56:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292882522364350465
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292843928278970377
-
It’s this difference between verbal-idealism(words), mathematical-physical ideal
… It’s this difference between verbal-idealism(words), mathematical-physical idealism(existence), and computational-economic thought (action).
… At this point I’m convinced that understanding ‘the grammars’ is about as important as understanding basic physics.
-Cheers
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron -
It’s this difference between verbal-idealism(words), mathematical-physical ideal
… It’s this difference between verbal-idealism(words), mathematical-physical idealism(existence), and computational-economic thought (action).
… At this point I’m convinced that understanding ‘the grammars’ is about as important as understanding basic physics.
-Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 13:43:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292818794143010818
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292818572671164417
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@bierlingm @adamsafron If you can’t state it’s dependencies (realism, naturalism ) measure it (categories) or operationalize (transformations) you don’t understand it (narration).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1292818572671164417
-
If you can’t state it’s dependencies (realism, naturalism ) measure it (categori
If you can’t state it’s dependencies (realism, naturalism ) measure it (categories) or operationalize (transformations) you don’t understand it (narration).
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 13:42:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292818572671164417
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292818001180467202
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@bierlingm @adamsafron FYI: I was asked to comment on this paper b/c it’s an area of my work. And the author blocked me for this thread. But just as physics is supporting a vast population of pseudoscientists, so is almost every other area of the academy other than applied math, compsci, and biochem.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1292818001180467202
-
If you can’t state it’s dependencies (realism, naturalism ) measure it (categori
If you can’t state it’s dependencies (realism, naturalism ) measure it (categories) or operationalize (transformations) you don’t understand it (narration).
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron