ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIAN “HIGH TRUST” ETHICS VS ROTHBARDIAN “GHETTO” ETHICS In the effort to suppress the state via arguments to anarchy the previous generations of libertarians failed to identify the cause of private property, and the differences between the high trust private property practiced by outbred homogenous ANF northern europeans, and the low trust inbred heterogeneous other cultures.
If you eliminate free riding in all its forms: violence, theft fraud, omission, obscurantism, externalization, socialization, privatization, corruption, conspiracy and conquest – then the only action remaining available to man is the voluntary exchange of private property.
Cooperation is only possible if we suppress all free riding. Thats what cooperating means.
Source date (UTC): 2014-02-14 09:43:00 UTC
AMERICAN FEMALE LUXURY GOODS:
1) Single Motherood
2) Independent Habitation
3) Financial Parasitism
4) Freedom from care, affection and sex to a beta.
5) Privileged legal status
At the expense of:
1) Male savings, asset accumulation and comfortable retirement.
2) Male sale of his productivity in exchange for care and sex.
3) Male quality of life
4) High male death rates from high risk labor
5) High male suicide rates
Source date (UTC): 2014-02-11 07:33:00 UTC
UKRAINIAN WISDOM
(fun)(true)
“There is nothing so useful in the home as a guilty husband.”
The degree of labor extraction a woman can obtain from a man is determined by BOTH her ability to identify and exploit opportunities for guilt, AND her ability to trade care, affection and sex. The economics of this indicates that over time, in any relationship, a woman will seek to reduce her costs and rely upon guilt as often as possible.
The only male defense then, is to **never feel guilty**. Which is what happens in most relationships. Both parties reduce their efforts until they justify reducing their efforts, and therefore they cause the loss of hope for any reward, and they remain together purely out of the problem of opportunity costs: they aren’t marketable any longer.
We can scientifically demonstrate that women have much higher expectations of men than men of women. I kind of wonder if this is some female genetic bias: that the reason they feel attracted to men is the promise extraction of labor. And males the promise of extraction of sex.
Source date (UTC): 2014-02-08 05:12:00 UTC
PROPERTARIANISM SOLVES THE PROBLEM OF RENDERING LEFT LIBERTARIANISM POSSIBLE, RATIONAL, MORAL, CALCULABLE WHILE PRESERVING PROPERTY RIGHTS.
I’m not advocating left libertarianism. I’m just stating that it’s possible. And it’s possible to articulate internally consistently with propertarian reasoning. And that’s a whole lot better than the Bleeding Heart Libertarians have done to date. (Not much.)
I mean, I love their sentiments, but it’s a sentimental, not rational or scientific movement without Propertarianism to base their arguments upon.
Source date (UTC): 2014-02-05 14:08:00 UTC
INTELLECTUAL ARMS DEALERS
I don’t have to defeat every ridiculous rothbardian acolyte.
I just have to arm the people who will.
Doin’ pretty good about right now. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2014-02-03 08:36:00 UTC
“ARISTOCRACY : THE CULT OF NON-SUBMISSION. THE PHILOSOPHY OF SOVEREIGNTY. THE POLITICS OF HEROISM. THE ETHICS OF PROPERTY”
Source date (UTC): 2014-01-30 03:36:00 UTC
FAIRY TALES : BOOTCAMP FOR VIRTUE
Source date (UTC): 2014-01-30 03:04:00 UTC
MIGHT ISN”T GOOD OR BAD – IT’S WHAT YOU DO WITH IT
Might can be used to make right, or to make wrong. But it is very hard to make right WITHOUT might. In fact, I do not think it is POSSIBLE to make right without might.
So, might itself is not matter of morality. It is a matter of what it’s used for.
The source of prosperity is the systematic suppression of free riding (cheating) by the organized use of violence.
Source date (UTC): 2014-01-28 06:05:00 UTC
“LIBERTY REQUIRES POINTED WEAPONS, POINTED ARGUMENTS, AND THE WILLINGNESS TO USE THEM BOTH”
Source date (UTC): 2014-01-28 02:21:00 UTC