ETHICS ISN’T COMPLICATED
Why don’t I kill you?
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-01 05:44:00 UTC
ETHICS ISN’T COMPLICATED
Why don’t I kill you?
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-01 05:44:00 UTC
Conservatism is not an intellectual movement. It’s an intuitionistic one. But it can be repaired. Slowly.
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-27 02:27:00 UTC
IQ IS MORE PREDICTIVE OF LIFE THAN SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS.
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 12:46:00 UTC
FREE KOENIGSBERG!!!!! SEND THE MONGOLS HOME!!!!
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 09:26:00 UTC
THE ONLY EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE ANARCHY IS CONSTRUCTED BY NOMOCRACY – WHEREIN NO ONE RULES BECAUSE EVERYONE RULES.
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-26 04:09:00 UTC
There is a big difference between adding empirical content and removing imaginary content.
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-25 16:37:00 UTC
Things are complicated when your premises are false.
Explanatory power is an awesome test.
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-25 12:00:00 UTC
I don’t judge the arational expression of agreement with truths.
I judge the arational expression of agreement with falsehhids; and the rational justification of falsehoods, and the pseudoscientific justification if falsehoods.
But increasingly I judge the incomplete use of due diligence in truth claims.
Which is novel.
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-25 04:19:00 UTC
Knowledge equips you with material with which to imagine by free association.
Knowledge fills the shelves of your mind with possible permutations you need only labor to imagine.
The scientific method equips you with means of eliminating from your statements what you imagine, what you err, what you bias, and what you use to deceive, prior entering them into the informational commons – as a means of not causing harm to the commons (pollution).
The scientific method – the method of removing imaginary content – is both a procedural one (contrary to scientific common knowledge), an empirical one (that removes imaginary content), and a moral one (with which you promise others you have done your due diligence).
And I would like to hold you accountable for your claims of ‘science’: wherein you state what warranties of due diligence you have performed, and what warranties of due diligence that you have not. Because there is no reason to grant you a partial warranty.
If you wish to publish your ideas, you can be held accountable for warranty you must provide in order to publish, whether you desire to provide that warranty or not.
Social scientists would diminish rapidly in number.
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-24 12:15:00 UTC
American police don’t enforce the law. They oppress dominance displays.
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-22 01:51:00 UTC