LIBERTARIANISM INCREASES ECONOMIC VELOCITY AT THE EXPENSE OF NORMATIVE AND GENETIC CAPITAL.
Thus endeth the lesson.
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-28 08:33:00 UTC
LIBERTARIANISM INCREASES ECONOMIC VELOCITY AT THE EXPENSE OF NORMATIVE AND GENETIC CAPITAL.
Thus endeth the lesson.
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-28 08:33:00 UTC
No, self-discipline is a means of accumulating capital (creating inventory).
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-28 08:21:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/615072632262762496
Reply addressees: @BourneAdequacy @Nero
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/614839020493873152
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/614839020493873152
BLOOD FOR THE TREE OF LIBERTY
If you don’t feed the tree of liberty frequently, then you must infrequently feed it a lot.
Thus endeth the lesson.
(Aristocratic Egalitarianism.)
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-26 03:25:00 UTC
[T]he discipline we call philosophy and the discipline we call science consist of a set of methods (processes) which philosophical science, the social sciences, and the physical sciences, use to launder existential impossibility, limitlessness, error, bias, imaginary content, wishful thinking, deception, and (objective) immorality (in the domain of the social sciences) from our testimony (speech).
This laundering is achieved by a set of methodological criticisms addressing increasing levels of complexity, of which philosophical science requires the full set of criticisms, social science a subset of those criticisms, and physical science yet another subset of those criticisms.
Those criticisms consist of tests of: Identity, Internal Consistency, External Correspondence, Existential Possibility (Operationalism), Full Accounting (against selection bias), Parsimony (limits), and Voluntary Transfer (objective morality).”
(I suppose a lot of philosophers could read that paragraph and weep – that it took us 2500 years to state it.)
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine.
[T]he discipline we call philosophy and the discipline we call science consist of a set of methods (processes) which philosophical science, the social sciences, and the physical sciences, use to launder existential impossibility, limitlessness, error, bias, imaginary content, wishful thinking, deception, and (objective) immorality (in the domain of the social sciences) from our testimony (speech).
This laundering is achieved by a set of methodological criticisms addressing increasing levels of complexity, of which philosophical science requires the full set of criticisms, social science a subset of those criticisms, and physical science yet another subset of those criticisms.
Those criticisms consist of tests of: Identity, Internal Consistency, External Correspondence, Existential Possibility (Operationalism), Full Accounting (against selection bias), Parsimony (limits), and Voluntary Transfer (objective morality).”
(I suppose a lot of philosophers could read that paragraph and weep – that it took us 2500 years to state it.)
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine.
—“Our words are just the rustling leaves at the ends of our genetic trees.”—
(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-24 05:37:00 UTC
TRUST IS NOT A SENTIMENTAL CULTURAL ATTRIBUTE
(worth repeating)
—“Trust is not sentimental value. It is a measure of the complexity of economic and social relations that can be constructed given the transaction costs that impede them.”—
Put that in your repertoire and smoke it. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-23 06:08:00 UTC
IF IT CAN”T BE EMBODIED IN LAW, IT IS MEANINGLESS.
I don’t write continental philosophy. I write analytic philosophy. And I can state Propertarianism as law. THat’s the problem I have with NRx. It’s good as a language. It’s good at educating. But it doesn’t provide a solution to post-agrarian polities, and it can’t be embodied in law. I still feel that Propertarianism is part of the reactionary movement, even if I don’t really have much to do with Moldbuggery.
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-22 08:56:00 UTC
If you wanna learn something, start a fight. Or at least, start an argument. 🙂 I’ve been doing it forever. It’s not very victorian. It’s not even nice. But it works. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-22 08:46:00 UTC
GOODNESS IS A PAYMENT FOR THE COMMONS
—Confucius said: ‘Make few false statements and do little you may regret, then all will be well.’ That was the civil service of Confucius’ time.—
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-21 08:01:00 UTC