Philosophers have small constituencies. It’s our constituencies that have large constituencies. We don’t, and can’t, write for the masses.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 07:16:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710001713927815168
Philosophers have small constituencies. It’s our constituencies that have large constituencies. We don’t, and can’t, write for the masses.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 07:16:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710001713927815168
Incentives ar enough. The problem is not art but theatre and movie.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 04:38:00 UTC
Did you know that Ridicule is a form of lying? It’s an ad hominem.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 04:05:00 UTC
Patents as off-book investment in high risk invention are a discreet tool in those cases where the market won’t do. Not a general strategy.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 03:53:00 UTC
Copyright protection has financed immorality. Creative commons protects creativity enough. Copyright must end. And with it decadent arts.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 03:44:00 UTC
Imagine the market for entertainment if copyrights were eliminated: Labors of love would still be produced. Profiting via degeneracy wouldnt
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 03:43:00 UTC
Creative Commons provides a moral constraint against profiting from the production of others. Copyright OTOH is not a moral prohibition.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 03:41:00 UTC
We are very good at killing. We domesticated ourselves, man, and much of nature with our violence. Violence is a good when put to good use.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 03:37:00 UTC
We conquered Babylon with reason. Conquered mysticism with science. And will conquer pseudoscience with Truth. An opportunity, not an end.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 03:35:00 UTC
The 19th-20th centuries tried a new religion of pseudoscience in an attempt to repeat our conquest by mysticism during the ancient era.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 03:33:00 UTC