Form: Aphorism

  • You can be both a libertarian and a redistributionist as long as youre also a eu

    You can be both a libertarian and a redistributionist as long as youre also a eugenicist. 😉 The problem is eugenics. Our ancestors knew that.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-24 06:48:00 UTC

  • ***Proles. We are supposed to conquer, disempower, civilise, and if necessary en

    ***Proles. We are supposed to conquer, disempower, civilise, and if necessary enslave these people. And for the good of humanity limit their ability to reproduce. Aren’t we? Why do we give them political power over us rather than place political power over them?***


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-23 05:33:00 UTC

  • Every attempt at a eugenic state has failed for the same reason: insufficient vi

    Every attempt at a eugenic state has failed for the same reason: insufficient violence to preserve it, and insufficient honesty in its constitution.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-22 13:52:00 UTC

  • We Are Prosecutors.

    We do not seek to agree upon action as they do in pursuit of allies, we only seek to prevent those actions that are harmful regardless of whether we create allies or enemies. By prosecuting we are not trying to engage parasites in cooperation, nor are we trying to win their consent, nor win their approval, nor even to assist them in understanding our position. Just the opposite: we are trying to determine if they are trying to engage in error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, or deceit, in order to obtain by fraud, rallying and shaming what they cannot obtain by fully informed voluntary exchange.

  • We Are Prosecutors.

    We do not seek to agree upon action as they do in pursuit of allies, we only seek to prevent those actions that are harmful regardless of whether we create allies or enemies. By prosecuting we are not trying to engage parasites in cooperation, nor are we trying to win their consent, nor win their approval, nor even to assist them in understanding our position. Just the opposite: we are trying to determine if they are trying to engage in error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, or deceit, in order to obtain by fraud, rallying and shaming what they cannot obtain by fully informed voluntary exchange.

  • ” Women don’t do bell curves. “— a friend. That really says it all. Its the be

    —” Women don’t do bell curves. “— a friend.

    That really says it all. Its the best meme I’ve run into. It’s not just that they can’t. It’s that THEY’RE AFRAID TO. Women are as afraid of bell curves as little girls are afraid of spiders. The bell curve is helpful to the bull, and fearful for the doe.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-21 14:08:00 UTC

  • Anti-Aristocracy Is Reducible To Anti-Evolution.

    The struggle against aristocracy is reducible, to the struggle against meritocracy, and the struggle against meritocracy is reducible, to the struggle against eugenics, and the struggle against eugenics is reducible, to the struggle against evolution.

  • Anti-Aristocracy Is Reducible To Anti-Evolution.

    The struggle against aristocracy is reducible, to the struggle against meritocracy, and the struggle against meritocracy is reducible, to the struggle against eugenics, and the struggle against eugenics is reducible, to the struggle against evolution.

  • I don’t deal with philosophies (excuses). I deal with opportunities, information

    I don’t deal with philosophies (excuses). I deal with opportunities, information, and incentives (causes). 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-20 16:33:00 UTC

  • The struggle against aristocracy is reducible, to the struggle against meritocra

    The struggle against aristocracy is reducible,

    to the struggle against meritocracy,

    and the struggle against meritocracy is reducible,

    to the struggle against eugenics,

    and the struggle against eugenics is reducible,

    to the struggle against evolution.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-20 06:30:00 UTC