Decidability means you are either a member of a family, tribe, and nation, or a government, corporation, employee, and serf. Why?
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 08:59:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768009826265858048
Decidability means you are either a member of a family, tribe, and nation, or a government, corporation, employee, and serf. Why?
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 08:59:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768009826265858048
Members of good families want nationalism, members of bad families universalism – in other words, they want a better family than made them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 07:14:00 UTC
Good families want nationalism, and bad families want universalism.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 05:00:00 UTC
Decidability means you are either a member of a family, tribe, and nation, or a government, corporation, employee, and serf. Why?
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 04:59:00 UTC
—“God is a hedge by the ir-responsible against the failures of the self, providing absolution consistent with time preferences, and an excuse not to go seek achievement of their capacity.”— John Jost
Ouch. Yes that is an excuse. A use we put our gods to.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-22 08:46:00 UTC
—“one attracts more flies with honey.”— (anon)
A priest, public intellectual, and merchant sells.
A judge prosecutes.
There is a difference between inspiration, education, coalition building, leadership, and prosecution, and judgement.
The problem of our age is not inspiration – it’s deception.
And I’m a prosecutor
(no criticism of my debate partner, just an opportunity to reiterate my position)
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-22 06:37:00 UTC
***A significant cultural problem is we see the Rational and Scientific Movements in the Greek and Anglo/German worlds as increases in physical science rather than INCREASES IN TRUTH TELLING***
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-22 06:15:00 UTC
When you do no harm, I have no say. When you do harm, I have a say. When you do enough harm, you have no say.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 13:34:00 UTC
my theory of rationality is just as unappealing to contemporaries as Hume’s was to his. Truth isn’t comfortable.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 12:57:00 UTC
No volume of facts justify a theory, it is whether it survives falsificatn
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 18:46:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767070235358822400
Reply addressees: @RealSuperflyTNT @alllibertynews @PAKallman @BobMurphyEcon @mises
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767064727918931968
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@RealSuperflyTNT @alllibertynews @PAKallman @BobMurphyEcon @mises facts are theories of data. The theory remains an open question
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/767064727918931968
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@RealSuperflyTNT @alllibertynews @PAKallman @BobMurphyEcon @mises facts are theories of data. The theory remains an open question
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/767064727918931968