Assuming you teach Christianity as myth rather than history, by and large it’s compatible with natural law. But not judaism. And not Islam.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 13:22:00 UTC
Assuming you teach Christianity as myth rather than history, by and large it’s compatible with natural law. But not judaism. And not Islam.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 13:22:00 UTC
We cannot control what nonsense you believe but we certainly can limit what nonsense you distribute. End the lies forever: Testimonial Truth
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 13:21:00 UTC
There is a great difference between establishing a religion and banning a religion. There is no reason we do not ban religions – frequently.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 13:20:00 UTC
Sorry but if your religion isn’t compatible with natural law, then it’s not compatible with rule of law, and not compatible with the west.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 13:19:00 UTC
Western Aristocracy is not a religion, or a philosophy, or a government – it is a technology and an INDUSTRY. And it is by use of this industry we have profited by dragging the beast man out of his parasitic past on the margins of nature into the transcendent mastery of himself, and nature.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 12:15:00 UTC
***Western Aristocracy is not a religion, or a philosophy, or a government – it is a technology and an INDUSTRY. And it is by use of this industry we have profited by dragging the beast man out of his parasitic past on the margins of nature into the transcendent mastery of himself, and nature.***
And at present the Russians are the only white people remaining to remember our mission: to rule, to domesticate, for profit.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 12:06:00 UTC
In each great transformational era we cast off the errors, justifications, and lies of the prior. And in doing so produce waves of retaliation by new errors, justifications and lies by those who benefitted from the former, or find opportunity in the newer.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 09:31:00 UTC
The political questions we face are very different if we seek to eliminate error, bias, and deceit, rather than if we seek to identify optimums by which to obtain discounts. People will seize the discounts no matter what. the problem is in decreasing the error, bias, and deceit, so that those opportunities are more readily visible. It’s not that we should ignore error bias and deceit so we must constantly thrash through them to find the opportunities amidst the clutter.
The political questions we face are very different if we seek to eliminate error, bias, and deceit, rather than if we seek to identify optimums by which to obtain discounts. People will seize the discounts no matter what. the problem is in decreasing the error, bias, and deceit, so that those opportunities are more readily visible. It’s not that we should ignore error bias and deceit so we must constantly thrash through them to find the opportunities amidst the clutter.
There is no steady state. the rules are not stateful, but adaptive. There is no ‘done’. genes and culture and norms and institutions all store past information that we can express when needed. It’s not that we are machines that adapt to a fixed set. but that we store a broad range of possibilities that we can express through genetic, cultural, normative, personal, political and institutional SELECTION. We are still thinking in terms of mechanical models rather than informational models. man and the universe are correctly represented as information.