Curt Doolittle

Form: Aphorism

  • PHILOSOPHERS NOW DEMOTED TO THE SAME RANKS AS THEOLOGIANS. Philosophers criticiz

    PHILOSOPHERS NOW DEMOTED TO THE SAME RANKS AS THEOLOGIANS.

    Philosophers criticize Theologians for archaic reasoning, and scientists criticize philosophers for archaic reasoning, and now Testimonialists get to criticize even scientists for archaic reasoning; criticize philosophers aggressively, and criticize theologians dismissively to the point of prosecutorally.

    I know, I know, I know….. Most people are over-invested in nonsense-philosophy as tools of categorization the same way that most people are over invested in theology, and the way that most people are subconsciously incapable of reversing their over-investment in justificationism, and consciously incapable of reversing their desire for monopoly decidability in justificationism.

    That point of demarcation( the error of monopoly, justificationary, decidability) may in fact function as the point of demarcation between post-human and human, the way agency functions as the point of self determination between human and domesticated animal. The way that observation of property in toto functions as the point of demarcation between domesticated animal and beast.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 17:23:00 UTC

  • TRUTH IS A MERCILESS GOD If your comforting lies are so precious that you will n

    TRUTH IS A MERCILESS GOD

    If your comforting lies are so precious that you will not burn them along with the comforting lies of the left, then you are not one of us, but one of them – no matter what comforting lies you tell yourself.

    Truth is a merciless god.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 15:48:00 UTC

  • A smart friend just reminded me how easy it is for smart folks to identify disti

    A smart friend just reminded me how easy it is for smart folks to identify distinctions without a difference.

    A question must propose a context.

    Those distinctions outside of the context are not differences.

    To conflate them is to impose your internal method of categorization upon the question rather than aswer the question with the properties that its decidabilty requires.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 15:43:00 UTC

  • the left self selects by fear of limited agency

    the left self selects by fear of limited agency.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 09:52:00 UTC

  • ***Your approval is undesirable. Your productive exchange is. And if that’s unat

    ***Your approval is undesirable. Your productive exchange is. And if that’s unattainable, your submission is preferable, and failing that, your extermination necessary.***

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 09:50:00 UTC

  • They use feminine arguments: “My approval is desirable, yet I have no argument o

    They use feminine arguments: “My approval is desirable, yet I have no argument other than the denial of my approval”.

    This is the inverse of our ancient strategy: your approval is undesirable. Your productive exchange is. And if that’s unattainable, your submission is preferable, and failing that, your extermination necessary.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 09:39:00 UTC

  • as soon as a boy matures, we must remove him from the influence of women. this h

    as soon as a boy matures, we must remove him from the influence of women. this has been true for all of history – until ‘the snowflake now’.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:56:00 UTC

  • Eat the weak. They waste the world’s resources and they inhibit our transcendenc

    Eat the weak. They waste the world’s resources and they inhibit our transcendence into the gods we seek.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:54:00 UTC

  • ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE ACADEMIC DISCIPLINES I take economists seriously

    ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE ACADEMIC DISCIPLINES

    I take economists seriously in their criticism of social science. I take physicists seriously in their criticism of economics. I take philosophers seriously in their criticism of physics. I take historians seriously in their criticism of philosophy. I take the common law seriously in its criticism of the history of man. For man, in every discipline, the mirror always lies.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Natural Law of Sovereign Men

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 07:58:00 UTC

  • All power resides in violence – violence exists by its own making. Finance, Prod

    All power resides in violence – violence exists by its own making.

    Finance, Production and Trade exist by permission.

    Priests, Academy, Intellectuals and Gossips by tolerance.

    The strong always rule.

    The question is, will you rule?

    Or will you be ruled?

    If you rule, will you rule competitively?

    Or will you rule uncompetitively?

    Rule is profitable. It is the most profitable of businesses.

    If one rules well, it is the most moral of businesses.

    If one rules well for a long time, one transcends man.

    So, stop thinking like a bourgeoise, and think as a ruler that makes the productive bourgeoise possible by permission, and the parasitic gossips, possible by tolerance.

    The reason to rule well, with permission and tolerance, is that one can rule profitably and enjoy it, one can rule long and persist it, and one can rule morally and transcend man.

    What greater achievements are possible?

    None.

    So let us rule.

    Rule well.

    Rule profitably and enjoyably.

    Rule persistently.

    And Transcend the beast man.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-26 14:01:00 UTC