(Television is the curse of the American people….. Followed rapidly by the advertising it distributes.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-04 20:34:00 UTC
(Television is the curse of the American people….. Followed rapidly by the advertising it distributes.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-04 20:34:00 UTC
METAPHYSICS
I am pretty sure that there exist no branches of anything in philosophy per se, but simply dimensions of reality, and the methods we invent for testing those dimensions.
Those methods either succeed in providing means of testing the dimensions of reality or not.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-04 15:07:00 UTC
(yeah, I’m all for skepticism, but humility is just another abrahamism.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-03 09:13:00 UTC
I always wonder why we say “economic left, and economic right”, when what we can only possibly mean over any long term is Dysgenic Left and Eugenic Right.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-02 19:19:00 UTC
Why are men more violent than women? (Stupid question). Why do women have more children than men? (Stupid for the same reason.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 18:04:00 UTC
JOSLIN HITS A HOME RUN
Patriotism expresses the sentiment of individual ownership of the commons.
(Ownership incentive)
Collectivism expresses consumer incentives of the commons
(Consumption incentives)
Anti-authority libertarianism expresses extraction incentives of the commons (Exploitation incentives)
Only one of them is sustainable.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 15:29:00 UTC
So far as I can tell, primitive animism, western discipline-ritual, eastern harmony-ritual, are all ‘good’; and the zoroastrian is borderline; the vedic crosses the border; and the abrahamic religions are all ‘bad’.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-30 09:34:00 UTC
Paganism provides ‘advice’ we can choose to heed.
Abrahamism provides ‘law’ we must obey.
That is enough of a distinction for any of us to understand.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-30 09:24:00 UTC
—Microsoft is one of those companies that manufactures false positives faster than the left can manufacture excuses for its failures.—
(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-28 12:08:00 UTC
you know when a bunch of chicks get together and talk about he said she said? then another group says the same thing but saying its right or wrong but simply give their feelings about it? then another group says ‘well if everyone did that” (the categorical imperative). And then another group says ‘well, you know, we tried that in 1950s”. And then another group says ‘well, statistically it looks like this’. And then another group says “well, this is the set of options available to them at the time, and this is what their incentives were so that is what they chose because they had only those choices”.
That’s what I mean by arguing by moral intuition.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-27 12:44:00 UTC