Most philosophical questions are actually sophisms. The truth is that at this point we know the answer to almost every question other than those we cannot inspect such as the very large and very small.
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-26 15:06:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1927018478298366262
Ignorance of physical causality using literary pre-science as substitute
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-23 23:19:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1926055397149888724
Victory is not complete until vulnerability is erased.
Crisis resolution without system reform guarantees recurrence.
| You do not merely deport illegal people.
| You must deport illegal ideas, illegal institutions, and illegal incentives.
And then you encode sovereignty into the DNA of law, state, and soul—permanently.
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-23 15:33:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1925938057196261642
Participation in a Polity is voluntary. Can’t have demand for reciprocity without duty. Can’t have duty without joining polity. Duty is therefore voluntary.
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-21 19:39:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1925275240848076893
Well, I guess it’s back to revolution by force of arms.
At least we have the reforms almost ready. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-16 22:41:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1923509260908101733
because of closure, math and programming are easier than linguistic reasoning. linguistic reasoning is just easier to fake and harder to test.
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-14 14:25:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1922659562017960148
Reply addressees: @Claffertyshane
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1922380726692983197
IN REPLY TO:
@Claffertyshane
@curtdoolittle Well don’t forget o3, what else out there can perform statistical and reasoning with large complicated data sets without missing the point? Also o3-high-mini has made very complicated code blocks for me with minimal back and forth.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1922380726692983197
Unfortunately, europeans can’t do what we call in basic economics ‘full accounting’ – ‘the seen and unseen’.
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-12 18:32:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921996984153510044
Reply addressees: @KarlKautabak @BehizyTweets
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921958383625683385
Admission is best used for displays of humility by use of self deprecating humor. 😉 So maybe. lol
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-10 18:37:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921273445414814091
Reply addressees: @auny_marie @PicturesFoIder
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921201556545818976
IN REPLY TO:
@auny_marie
@curtdoolittle @PicturesFoIder Haha 😄 Do we have to admit to doing it more than once over the years?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921201556545818976
The research suggests that morality increases because the utility of immorality decreases. It’s not that smarter and wealthier people are more moral, it’s that morality is more useful for them, because they are more capable of identifying and pursuing potential reciprocal…
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-09 17:14:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920890080736276572
Reply addressees: @basedc1 @sbkaufman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920878702243541461
IN REPLY TO:
@basedc1
I think there is some correlation between intellect and morality, but it’s not 1 (obviously). If I’m just riffing off the cuff, I think that the more intellect one has, the better one can model the perspective of another person. Empathy requires a fairly complex analysis of another person’s incentives and experiences, and the difficulty of that analysis rises the more that other person’s circumstances are from one’s own.
Tl:Dr empathy requires horsepower, and empathy correlates with moral actions. Both correlations are imperfect, however.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920878702243541461
(Reverence like faith is absent reason. We need reason to revere them. And they must leave us the reasons to do so. We have left the stagnation of the agrarian age where all our ethics and morals and traditions developed. And in doing so thrown out the wisdom baby with the…
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-06 03:47:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1919599836980248943
Reply addressees: @adulpanget @yaycapitalism @ItIsHoeMath @memeticsisyphus @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1919589827525411071