Women are disloyal which is why they have only a few close friends, but many acquaintances. Men form loyalty networks instead, of less deep but more flexible relations.
Aside from differences in bias between experiential and algorithmic, this difference in loyalty vs harmony causes the various differences in occupational achievement.
As risk increases so does the risk of defection, and men do not defect under disharmony where women will defect at the first sign of it.
Form: Aphorism
-
So just as we see the quantum level emerge from some underlying causes, and we s
So just as we see the quantum level emerge from some underlying causes, and we see the physical level emerge from underlying causes, and the chemical level from underlying causes, and the biological from underlying causes then we see the same in economics and in language.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 10:09:00 UTC
-
So Mises was wrong in stating that there are no constant relations in economics.
So Mises was wrong in stating that there are no constant relations in economics. Instead, the constant relations are limited to those harmonics (intermediary, or externalities) that limit the consequences of causal relations. -
So Mises was wrong in stating that there are no constant relations in economics.
So Mises was wrong in stating that there are no constant relations in economics. Instead, the constant relations are limited to those harmonics (intermediary, or externalities) that limit the consequences of causal relations.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 10:06:00 UTC
-
So Mises was wrong in stating that there are no constant relations in economics.
So Mises was wrong in stating that there are no constant relations in economics. Instead, the constant relations are limited to those harmonics (intermediary, or externalities) that limit the consequences of causal relations. -
So logic has no non-trivial value, since the function of logic outside of mathem
So logic has no non-trivial value, since the function of logic outside of mathematics – which consists of nothing but constant relations sets is merely the falsification of inconstant relations. Instead, semantics, grammar, and syntax serves to limit relations to sets of constant relations the way lie groups limit causal relations. -
So logic has no non-trivial value, since the function of logic outside of mathem
So logic has no non-trivial value, since the function of logic outside of mathematics – which consists of nothing but constant relations sets is merely the falsification of inconstant relations. Instead, semantics, grammar, and syntax serves to limit relations to sets of constant relations the way lie groups limit causal relations.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 10:04:00 UTC
-
So logic has no non-trivial value, since the function of logic outside of mathem
So logic has no non-trivial value, since the function of logic outside of mathematics – which consists of nothing but constant relations sets is merely the falsification of inconstant relations. Instead, semantics, grammar, and syntax serves to limit relations to sets of constant relations the way lie groups limit causal relations. -
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but nece
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but necessary.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 09:23:00 UTC
-
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but nece
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but necessary.