Form: Aphorism

The central problem of induction is learning the tools of micro and macro scale…. while at the same time abandoning reliance on the intuition “of human scale”.

I like this positioning because it explains the cause of the difficulty for humans: the intuition of human scale.

Just to foster some thought: The difference in induction between pet, child, and scientist, is that while we all study constant relations, we study the constant relations at an inflation(bigger) or a deflation(smaller) of human (mammalian) scale – just as we study the universe at the subatomic, physical, chemical, biological, behavioral, and sentient scales. While meaningful (marginally different) causal density remains constantly complex across those scales, observability above our ability to act and below our ability to act rapidly decreases, forcing us to create physical and logical instruments to construct proxies for observations of constant relations at macro and micro scales. But either way, we seek operations (changes in state), constant relations(Stable states), and predictions of future states.