Curt Doolittle

Form: Aphorism

  • ( I quote the church all the time, but I translate the work of the scholastics i

    ( I quote the church all the time, but I translate the work of the scholastics into secular prose)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 13:44:00 UTC

  • BTW, I do science(testimony) and law(Decidability). As far as I know, philosophy

    BTW, I do science(testimony) and law(Decidability). As far as I know, philosophy is limited to the determination of personal choice, and interpersonal good. And that is probably all that is left for philosophers to judge. Truth is now in the domain of science – as it should have been all along.

  • Voting as an alternative to revolution (tossing out the government of the common

    Voting as an alternative to revolution (tossing out the government of the commons) is an excellent idea, as long as (a) this does not affect the monarchy and the military, and (b) as long as it is not asymmetric among the classes. In other words, those who have greater responsibilities and those who have lesser responsibilities must both agree. The real problem of democracy was (a) women and (b) underclasses and (c) vast immigration of underclass (including the catholics who are white.)

  • Voting as an alternative to revolution (tossing out the government of the common

    Voting as an alternative to revolution (tossing out the government of the commons) is an excellent idea, as long as (a) this does not affect the monarchy and the military, and (b) as long as it is not asymmetric among the classes. In other words, those who have greater responsibilities and those who have lesser responsibilities must both agree. The real problem of democracy was (a) women and (b) underclasses and (c) vast immigration of underclass (including the catholics who are white.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 13:06:00 UTC

  • Voting as an alternative to revolution (tossing out the government of the common

    Voting as an alternative to revolution (tossing out the government of the commons) is an excellent idea, as long as (a) this does not affect the monarchy and the military, and (b) as long as it is not asymmetric among the classes. In other words, those who have greater responsibilities and those who have lesser responsibilities must both agree. The real problem of democracy was (a) women and (b) underclasses and (c) vast immigration of underclass (including the catholics who are white.)

  • The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason serio

    The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason seriously (b) does not respect the boundary of violence.

    In the past, we could use violence agianst women who broke that boundary – just as we could use it against men.

    Our big mistake was ending slander, libel, scolding, and the duel.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 12:49:00 UTC

  • The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason serio

    The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason seriously (b) does not respect the boundary of violence. In the past, we could use violence agianst women who broke that boundary – just as we could use it against men. Our big mistake was ending slander, libel, scolding, and the duel.

  • The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason serio

    The problem is you can’t take a woman seriously if she (a) does not reason seriously (b) does not respect the boundary of violence. In the past, we could use violence agianst women who broke that boundary – just as we could use it against men. Our big mistake was ending slander, libel, scolding, and the duel.

  • The Parasitisms That Compete With Reciprocity

    Marxism = parasitism upon private property. Libertarianism = Parasitism upon commons. NeoConservatism = Parasitism upon Genes, Traditions, and Institutions. Authoritarianism masks the underlying theft, which is why I talk not about the authority (which each sector justified) but about the thefts (which are very hard to). Same with economics. We talk about whether they aer scientific or not but we do not talk about the thefts that occur, versus the trades that would be possible under rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity. Theft is not an opinion. “Good” is an opinion.

  • The Parasitisms That Compete With Reciprocity

    Marxism = parasitism upon private property. Libertarianism = Parasitism upon commons. NeoConservatism = Parasitism upon Genes, Traditions, and Institutions. Authoritarianism masks the underlying theft, which is why I talk not about the authority (which each sector justified) but about the thefts (which are very hard to). Same with economics. We talk about whether they aer scientific or not but we do not talk about the thefts that occur, versus the trades that would be possible under rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity. Theft is not an opinion. “Good” is an opinion.