ANTI-ISRAEL? WHY NOT PRO ISRAEL?
Hmmm… Support them there so they go there? If you don’t support them there, more will come to you? While there are only 6-7M Jews in israel, there are about the same number 6.3M in the USA. And smaller numbers in France (440,000), Canada (398,000), the United Kingdom (312,000), Argentina (171,000), Russia (132,000), Germany (125,000), and Australia (117,200). So under 2M outside of Israel and the USA. They are only safe in the anglosphere and broader germanosphere at present it seems.
Conversely, israel, with a population of an additional eight millon, jews, totalling under 15M, would approximate the population of the Netherlands, and it’s per capita GDP of 50k, and total economy of 1T. This would have (and have to have) an extraordinarily positive strategic, economic, educational, and eventually cultural impact on the middle east, assisting them in their slow ascent out of supernatural m aysticism ignorance, mandated non-education, and economic subsistence without the oil revenues.
WHAT ABOUT THE NEGATIVE EFFECT OF JEWS IN THE WEST?
Of course we could just make a few adjustments in our laws to prevent baiting into hazard, privatizing gains and socializing losses.
And we could outlaw sedition using the female to feminine to abrahamic-to-marxist sequence – so that we we equally suppressed feminine jewish abrahamic marxist antisocial behavior. Because feminine behavior is genetic, instinctual, and all but unsuppressable, especially their antisocial behavior.
And we could return all credit expansion to the treasury and end the coercive and rent seeking power of the private financial sector, and vastly increase the treasury without increased taxation – perhaps even replacing taxation.
And of course (my) our organization has prepared all that constitutional law as permanent amendments. So it’s easily done.
And then it wouldn’t matter that jewish group evolutionary strategy, jewish instinct, and jewish culture was just the expression of female sedition against males by means of seduction into baiting into hazard and subsequent rent seeking, instead of earnings from production and reciprocal exchange free of negative externalities. 😉
But then as usual I’m probably talking over heads…. Hopefully someone catches on, a little at a time. 😉
We dont need to keep adding to the list of 109 explosions and we don’t need any more violence. We only need to domesticate women and jews, just as we have domesticated other groups in europe, on group, one class at a time. It’s just that women and jews together during teh 20th were a bit much when we were christian conservatives and foolishly optimistic as hour hight trust society and culture teach us… despite that it’s also a vulnerability as well as a benefit.z
Codify the feminie-jewish-abrahamic- marxist sequence as what it is: crime. And institutionalize it in our legal code. And purge that behavior from our polities forever, just as we have incrementally purged all other antisocial behavior.
Because male antisocial behavior is more obvious and urgent we acted on it first. But now that we can industrialize liying sedition and rent seeking and parasitism through indirect institutional means we must also suppress the feminine as thoroughly as we have suppressed the masculine.
From my standpoint I see women and jews as an asset just as I see other europeans as an asset or all higher performing people as an asset. The difference is we did not force jewish integration and they instead undermined our demand for integration and the consequence has been horrific. That said, ‘fixing’ the problem of the feminine isn’t that difficult as I’ve roughly outlined above. So why not preserve the asset even if there is a short term cost to it. And even if we should have made this legal change already regarding women independent of the jewish baiting of women into their strategy of sedition.
Of course it takes political power to do so and that might men we cannot do so democratically, but must do so responsibly by ‘other means”.
With humor and affection
By painful truth regardless
For the betterment of all
C Doolittle
Reply addressees: @AndrewJV123 @auny_marie