Category: Uncategorized

  • THE FLOOD MYTH AND NOAH Noah is a myth that reflected the flood of the Persian g

    THE FLOOD MYTH AND NOAH
    Noah is a myth that reflected the flood of the Persian gulf 8000 years ago, the destruction of their lands, and their flight North in their primitive reed boats: the coracle. Early texts describe the arks including measurements. The people, the proto-Sumerians were not even semitic. In fact there is a suggestion they borrowed words and traded with the indus people.
    See https://t.co/4heXYkvzJs
    Time to grow up and leave behind children’s stories.
    The Jews merely copied others’ myths to construct a heroic history of their own they did not have. Lying in the middle east is an archaic and continuing art form.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-27 02:38:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751072059390558208

  • Tricia. I’m … confounded. πŸ™‚ I’ve known you for quite a while. And… You gott

    Tricia. I’m … confounded. πŸ™‚ I’ve known you for quite a while. And… You gotta be kidding. I have three children from three different women, what amounts to five stepkids from three others, all three of which I wanted to ‘add one’ to. And I’d keep going if my health would let me.,, and I thought it was moral.

    Reality is that unless daddy was smart AND masculine AND an influence, (rare) women do not value intelligence. Unless you combine intelligence with some other factor, in my case I was considered attractive despite the height penalty when I was younger. I was confident, aggressive, competitive, cultured, successful and I don’t fear violence (at all). Aside from height I had a lot going for me. And it’s true the hight penalty is huge.

    So if you’re ‘just intelligent’ it’s a dead end. You need all the other attributes women want. Charisma, looks, danger, resources and some confidence they can ‘hold your attention’.

    So intelligence doesn’t reproduce unless it’s a woman that’s intelligent also, or who had an intelligent father. Likewise not-intelligent women are extremely tedious and emotionally tiring, and when you’re bright it isn’t people that fulfill you so much – it’s ideas.

    Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 23:27:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751024192026198016

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751017159663538513

  • “The source of this document is described as an essay that was published on soci

    –“The source of this document is described as an essay that was published on social media and became trending. The author of this essay is unknown, but the host speculates that the author could be someone with access to Xi Jinping and his inner circle, or the writing might have been commissioned or authorized by the top leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).”–

    SOURCE
    https://t.co/htGiaUzrjU

    (I am still skeptical. But I’ve read about a year’s worth of his posts on BackChina and they’re consistent. In fact, he’s a pretty wise fellow and I might just follow him consistently)

    RELATED
    https://t.co/tBuNh0qKlY

    https://t.co/6EEEJKf0rd

    https://t.co/I767m4YJjq

    Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 23:16:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751021367896530944

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751011899247116485

  • CD: QUESTIONS – How do you envision the practical implementation of these reform

    CD: QUESTIONS
    – How do you envision the practical implementation of these reforms in existing legal and constitutional frameworks?
    – What challenges do you foresee in translating complex scientific and cognitive insights into operational legal principles?
    – How do you assess the potential impact of these changes on the broader socio-political landscape, especially in terms of conflict resolution and societal stability?

    CURTD
    I don’t believe there is any difficulty translating scientific and cognitive insights into operational egal principles. It requires first creating a universally commensurable paradigm, vocabular and logic with which to unify the physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and formal (logical) sciences. Doolittle has done that with universal commensurability in operational language.

    So there is really just one universal principle to all of existence and it simply expands as theh complexity of matter from the merely physical to conscious life to the systems of cooperation between complex conscious life.

    As such all existence is operationally reducible, even if we do not yet know enough to reduce it to that first principle.

    As for the potential impact, the population takes about a decade for any change in the law to percolate down through the courts, legislature, bureaucracy, economy society, famly, and individual as a set of biases or rules at their scale of competency and influence.

    So this would take about a decade to propagate down. And I think it would provide mindfulness and clarity to a confused and stressed population.

    However there are vast sections of our population that are engaged in one form of free riding, rent seeking, corruption, conspiracy sedition or worse, and they are largely in the academic, media, state, and financial sectors – very privileged folk because of the permissibility of their criminality.

    So I would expect many people in those sectors to resist reforms that would prevent their currently ‘tolerated’ crimes.

    GPT
    Your perspective on translating scientific and cognitive insights into operational legal principles through a universally commensurable paradigm is both intriguing and ambitious. Curt Doolittle’s approach, as you describe it, seeks to integrate various disciplines using a universal principle expanded through operational language. This paradigm appears to aim for a comprehensive and unified understanding of existence, from physical phenomena to complex social interactions.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:41:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751012398033436672

  • yes. πŸ˜‰

    yes. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:37:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751011524162793666

    Reply addressees: @Josh_Ebner

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751010361505915115

  • RT @Josh_Ebner: @curtdoolittle “Rights only exist by our capacity to use violenc

    RT @Josh_Ebner: @curtdoolittle “Rights only exist by our capacity to use violence to prosecute violations of those rights.”

    Taken together…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:37:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751011444240351404

  • Too bad women can’t handle Taleb’s insight into Anti-Fragility despite that the

    Too bad women can’t handle Taleb’s insight into Anti-Fragility despite that the whole prupose of teh female intuition is to evade the adaptation that produces anti-fragility. …

    I’m a having a bad day just thinking about this so deeply. lol

    I love women.

    But… they have no…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:24:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751008316711399702

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751002382236803128

  • I am pretty sure, almost certain, it came out of one of the journals. I can find

    I am pretty sure, almost certain, it came out of one of the journals. I can find out. I will.

    There is no way this would come out at a plenum. That would be insane. lol

    It would only be confirmed there once the pubilic had already accepted it.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:23:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751007897964683303

    Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751004823850475778

  • So let me ask an odd question. Why is there such a prohibiton on debate? Or, is

    So let me ask an odd question. Why is there such a prohibiton on debate? Or, is it that there is only a prohibition on that debate’s visibility beyond the leadership?

    Why is dissent so feared and response to it so intolerant?

    I mean, I quite honestly can’t really imagine it.…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:21:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751007530472370654

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751005697217798366

  • Ouch. True. πŸ™ OMG… So, you know, this would be one of those profoundly intere

    Ouch. True. πŸ™

    OMG… So, you know, this would be one of those profoundly interesting discussions we could have that might prove educational to not only me but others.

    Why does this behavior exist? In historical terms it means that a governing system is more political and less procedural. And that is rather odd given the very long history of chinese bureaucracy and institutional excellence.

    I can see a hypothetical that is similar to the problem Confucius discovered, which is that because of all the ‘status signaling’ and ‘competitoin for status’ in the state and bureaucracy (in the absence of argument so to speak), that he could not and the people could not solve the problem of politics. Which, in general, is simply rule, procedure testimony and warranty.

    But you know, woe be the intellectual who looks at history, finds some analogy there and tries to misapply it to the present circumstance only to look the fool when told the more obvious reality that is present in the day. πŸ˜‰

    So I would love to discuss this.

    Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:19:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751007090460532736

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751005814926811415