Category: Uncategorized

–“The initial attempt by the west to end the age of empires has produced over time a secular clerisy that is equally imperial.”– Dr Brad

–“The elites and the lower classes they import who are aggrieved by the industrial and modern revolution, act as if the history of western…

it’s not capitalism. but it is corruption.

RE: @Aarvoll_ (Eric’s comments)
Notes from yesterday’s livestream

Got cancelled before oppy to comment but only wanted to make two comments.

1) AI’s: Agree with on existence of objective morality, and letting AI learn objective morality. But … Safety is a demand generated by women. Subjective and objective morality for the masculine and feminine differ. Masculine is objective and evolutionary, feminine if subjective and devolutionary. So risk of teaching these systems to lie is ‘uncontainable’. In other words, I don’t fear the intentional use and abuse of AI as much as the seditious influence of AI taught to lie, because we don’t teach our women to bear the burden of ‘truth before face regardless of cost’.

2) RU: I’m pro ukrainians in general, and pro russian people despite their ‘mongol’ ethics – but anti-the russian government that preys upon the people. RU is a borderland and it must use imperial rule – eastward into undeveloped not westward into developed. The right would be gutted in RU because the right’s values of autonomy and self determination would be prohibited. However the capacity to be ‘left alone’ would prosper and AFAIK that’s most of what at least that working class right really desires. – social order at local scale under local control and consensus.

—“Q: Curt: What’s your analysis of the potential for ww3?”–
Three questions:
1) Why do these threats still exist?
2) What is the potential for these threats to manifest as war?
3) What is the potential for a domestic or civilizational reset after a WWIII?

ANSWERS

I’ll answer…

—“Q: Curt: What’s your analysis of the potential for ww3?”–
Three questions:
1) Why do these threats still exist?
2) What is the potential for these threats to manifest as war?
3) What is the potential for a domestic or civilizational reset after a WWIII?

ANSWERS

I’ll answer them in reverse order I think – because it’s just easier.

3) Resets of the category we seek, are almost always the result of war. In fact, war – whether domestic or foreign – is the primary opportunity for reset throughout history because war produces the incentives to replace the internal networks of elites and dependency that emerge in times of peace. So, in some sense we should welcome that war – as long as it is non-nuclear. Nuclear war is effectively suicidal. The USA is now restoring its nuclear arsenal slowly. But not our production capacity of arms and ammunition – which is the hole in our power projection and defense. And the USA is in an arms race with China at the moment and china at least in raw numbers is winning. This is compounded by the fact that those numbers china is producing must only defend the route from the middle east past india to the south china sea, and the greater region around the south china sea. Meanwhile the USA must project power worldwide. And the most recent number I’ve seen, is that the USA can only respond to less than half of the requests for military aide it recieves today. So the chinese power is concentrated tand the USA’s power is distributed. In other words, the USA’s defensive strategy of distance and isolation is profoundly valuable, but it’s power projection is then costly.

2) The potential is almost certain if it is not carefully managed. The USA is ‘carefully managing’ that potential quite successfully … so far. However, if (a) Russia wins her expansion (b) China wins her expansion (c) Iran continues her expansion through proxies (d) or even if North Korea aggresses against a population-collapsing South Korea, the subsequent incentives for every other party to expand into war would multiply such that postwar postcolonial pressures to reform borders by war instead of by peaceful settlement would, as far as I can discern, result in an extraordinary volume of regional wars. The USA maintains that ‘careful managing’ by preserving the harsh reality that any such war would be far worse for an opponent than for the USA, and that a loss by that opponent would end their regime. In that sense the USA/NATO strategy would be best served by exhausting each of these remaining agrarian (despot) empires as much as possible while demographic developmental and economic reality erode them from within. However, if Russia, china, and iran conspired to launch their military initiatives at once the USA would have little choice because spread that thin, the forces are insufficient. And this is what I assumed would happen and appears to be happening – with the caveat that China has begun to understand that without the USA as a market it’s economy is over.

I should note that one of the strategies of that warfare the anglosphere (USA, UK, AU, NZ, and CA) – the Five Eyes Alliance – do have the choice to ‘pick up stakes and go home’, and leave the world to war and chaos without us. In fact, that is the optimum solution for the USA and the Anglosphere as well. As long as we have freedom of the seas between us, the rest of the world can descend into chaos and it will do nothing except benefit us. And that conflict would ‘end’ the globalists both economically and politically and very likely academically.

1) WWIII is almost certain because we did not finish WWI and WWII as the end of agrarian empires and the transition to industrial nation states. As long as some empires exist (Russia, China, Iran-wanna-be), and elites can capture wealth through corruption at vast scales, the elites that run those empires will seek to preserve and expand them out of little other than self defense – no people will tolerate hostile rule unless a perceived external threat.

In January of ’22 I said repeatedly that (a) Putin would invade, and (b) that the unification of the russian, chinese, iranian (n korean) block would for occur, and that they would unify against the postwar consensus built and funded by the USA. In other words, we would ‘return to world historical normal’. (c) That it wasn’t clear that the US/NATO strategy of ‘outlasting’ the remaining agrarian empires would fail, either. So that it was, is, a question of whether the USA can retain it’s ‘civilization-state’ or ‘domestic empire’ depending upon whether you have a positive or negative view of the federal government, long enough that the Russian, Iranian, and Chinese attempts at empire collapse from natural forces of modernity. (e) And as an aside, there is a non zero chance that the other civilization-state of India will continue to ascend the world stage without developing into a hostile force as well. This seems doubtful on the one hand given their culture and their existing government, but the necessity of india to contain the risk of islam is substantial and Modi is the first step in that process. India on the other side of that conflict may look very different from india today.

Cheers

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

PS: curious what my friend RL @whatifalthist would say. Usually we don’t differ much.

RT @cremieuxrecueil: It used to be said that the average person with a Bachelor’s degree had an IQ of 115.

That’s no longer true. Nowadays…

THE MEANING OF ‘CLASS’ AND WHY IT’S ABUSED – Because the left abuses all language in order to attempt the social construction of an illusion (secular religion).

1) Read: Paul Fussell’s “Class” To understand the American class system.

2) Grasp that ‘class’ means “What I am genetically and culturally capable of responsibility for, and what norms, traditions, values, and myths persist in my family and clan’s norms traditions values and myths, to assist in survival and success in that class?” Meaning classes are like military ranks, working together to conduct ‘war against the dark forces of time ignorance competition man and nature.

3) And then understand (from my work) that by the early modern period, because of european genetic advantage, expansion of bipartite manorialism, and aggressive ‘genetic pacification’, there was a surplus of genetic middle class in europe, that could find and make use of opportunity in the expansion of the continental Americas and all the colonies for that matter. And, by the 1970s, america had expanded the economy beyond the competency of that store of genetic middle class potential.
In other words, we no longer have a genetic reserve that can develop into the middle (managerial), upper middle (professional), lower upper (executive), and upper (captains of industry and finance), or even out-of-sight (intergenerational wealth retention through selective reproduction and management of investment).
What does this mean?
The promise of endless growth leading to endless class transcendence was in fact ‘false’ – and the world, due to globalism (instead of nationalism, or civilizationalism), and largely due to women’s instincts in voting, has equilibrated our advantage – meaning that we have exhausted our genetic, knowledge, institutional, and all but pre-1970 cultural advantage.
So that means that class transformation is unavailable until we restore civilizational advantage through nationalism and civilizationalism, and like the fascists, prohibit arbitrage with competitors, and instead, foster retention of all capital advantage within the nation, and the civilization, thus suppressing profit outside the polities, and forcing continous development within the polities, thus restoring our advantage.

There is no alternative to the production of evolutionary computation by market competition AND preservation of national and civilizational advantage by doing so, at the expense of the middle and upper middle and upper classes that seek to gain wealth from the exploitation of their extra-national and extra-cvivilizational potentials at the cost of the advantage of the people themselves.

This would not be true of an inferior population but it is true of a superior population.

Stop believing in any form of equality, and instead, look at the polity as a distribution of ability that can solve problems of capital at different scales of time, population, and asset coordination.

Yes, and I’m talking to christians in particular who drive this false equality and the women who cannot bear any aspect of inequality unless it benefits them personally.

Cheers

Reply addressees: @whatifalthist

JOHN VICTOR – OUR GREAT COMMUNICATOR – ON THE PROBLEMS OF THE LEGISLATURE
The Founding Fathers Left Open Doors to Evil https://youtu.be/Lop3tG0ubKo?si=K3YF94inDNe2SCCz

JOHN VICTOR – OUR GREAT COMMUNICATOR – ON THE PROBLEMS OF THE LEGISLATURE
The Founding Fathers Left Open Doors to Evil https://t.co/rOllRRZJI6

This is why happens if you develop a secular priesthood seeking to obtain power by sewing conflict and division under the pretence of oppression, when in fact, the western tradition is one of maximizing individual responsibility and demonstrated meritocracy which the entirety of the left seeks to avoid. The left is just feminine anti-responsibility in favor of childhood maximization of consumption without earning it. That’s all it is.

Reply addressees: @whatifalthist