Category: Uncategorized

😉

RT @curtdoolittle: @R__Credo @darkmythos_ @alessabocchi I won’t publish my work on “The Course and Conduct of a Revolution” until the full…

I won’t publish my work on “The Course and Conduct of a Revolution” until the full constitutional reforms are published. Otherwise the revolutionary content becomes a means of undermining the interest and effect of the extraordinary work I and others have done on those reforms.

—“Random is what we call the unpredictable but it’s deterministic all the way down.”– Martin Štěpán @AutistocratMS https://twitter.com/AutistocratMS/status/1782491014306889910

Yes.

(Social Media Ethics)
I should just use this as part of my signature on every post. 😉

–“I suspect you may be smart enough to understand this post but that you might need exposition for the purpose of clarification. So please ask if necessary. But under no circumstances assume I err (I don’t), and instead, seek to understand, such that we may find fault with either person’s understanding or communication.”—

Cheers.
😉

RT @curtdoolittle: @cryptodiaries @swpwilliams @alessabocchi —“Your causal relationship is wrong. It’s not Women’s Rights -> Prosperity.…

—“Your causal relationship is wrong. It’s not Women’s Rights -> Prosperity. It’s Prosperity -> Women’s rights. Just like Racism does not lead to differential performance. Differential performance sometimes leads to racism.”– @cryptodiaries

We all make mistakes. But I rarely err, and I do not in this circumstance.
If you had any concept of the national or civilizational balance sheet of demonstrated interests in the spectrum of capital, you would never make such a foolish statement.
I see from your fourth sentence
1. race observation is correct
2. you’re presuming it’s a matter of differential performance rather than differential instinct between sex differences in cognition and the result.
3. You’re also incorrect in the first three sentences because it is precisely prosperity that leads to women’s rights and economic contribution. But you’re not stating that it leads to intertemporal institutional hazards, vastly expanding consumption and the negative consequences, the illusion of endless growth, the expansion of debt to accommodate it all, and the destruction of all organizations from social to educational, to economic to political because of this sequence of hyperconsumption WITHOUT the demand for responsibility for capital accumulation and preservation both in and across time.

I suspect you may be smart enough to understand this but that you might need exposition for the purpose of clarification, so please ask if necessary. But under no circumstances assume I err (I don’t), and instead, seek to understand, such that we may find fault with either person’s understanding or communication.

Affections;
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @cryptodiaries @swpwilliams @alessabocchi

WORTH REPEATING
(Why the masculine must constrain the pathological feminine) https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1775576013239431293

RT @curtdoolittle: @AMaskedMartyr @ScottAdamsSays Thank you so much. Honestly, it’s an honor to answer respectfully asked, intellectually h…