What do these four terms have in common?
– Fusion (energy production)
– Quantum Computing
– String Theory
– The Multiverse
😉
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-05 23:48:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1589041991551094785
Category: Science, Physics, and Philosophy of Science
-
What do these four terms have in common? – Fusion (energy production) – Quantum
-
TIME despite the sophistry of mathiness in physics
TIME despite the sophistry of mathiness in physics: https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1588901153836003329
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-05 14:30:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1588901521630310401
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1588901153836003329
-
Additionally: what we refer to as time is a measurement whether mathematical, li
Additionally: what we refer to as time is a measurement whether mathematical, linguistic, or experiential. And while the passage of time varies at different rates due to rates of quantum transformation at different mass and velocity, the base rate of time like base energy exists.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-05 14:28:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1588901153836003329
Reply addressees: @OryonL @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1588564891128201217
-
Me too. But the universe is a vast irradiated wasteland, and this planet, everyt
Me too. But the universe is a vast irradiated wasteland, and this planet, everything on it, including ourselves, tries to kill us with regularity – and nearly succeeding. Meanwhile we fool ourselves with streetlamp fallacies. So Truth is often indistinguishable from satire.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-02 20:18:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587902073584041984
Reply addressees: @patg00 @KeishaKnits @TheBrothersTao @wil_da_beast630
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587901088333799424
-
I’m humble in temperament but arrogant in my knowledge of my discipline. If you
I’m humble in temperament but arrogant in my knowledge of my discipline. If you rely on intuition, moralizing, and experience rather than science then you will confuse my statements of the science of behavior as opinion equal to yours – it isn’t. That’s the confusion.
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-01 21:11:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587552983830925313
Reply addressees: @PolitiCrazies @ReneeAlida
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587552120177414144
-
~”The four theories David Deutsch picks are epistemology; evolution by natural s
~”The four theories David Deutsch picks are epistemology; evolution by natural selection; quantum theory (physics); and the theory of computation, which includes his theory of quantum computation.”~
He’s just restated three of the four sciences, w/o behavior. That’s all.
@naval
Source date (UTC): 2022-11-01 15:15:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587463469925801986
-
I didn’t appeal to them. I stated it didn’t matter whether you interpreted the l
I didn’t appeal to them. I stated it didn’t matter whether you interpreted the laws of the universe by natural origin or supernatural origin, it didn’t matter, because causality is irrelevant. And yes, you blame whiteness for discovery and adaptation to those laws as oppression.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-31 17:21:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587132679434149888
Reply addressees: @Smahtguyz2 @newsmax
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587131280864550912
-
No, I’m stating that if you believe that you can choose between the science (law
No, I’m stating that if you believe that you can choose between the science (laws of the univers) and god if you want. In legal parlance, it’s stated as “the laws of nature and nature’s god” in order to accommodate the spectrum of trust to belief.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-31 17:09:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587129749813477377
Reply addressees: @Smahtguyz2 @newsmax
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587129159758888963
-
Sorry munchkin. I do the science. No matter how hard you try to socially constru
Sorry munchkin. I do the science. No matter how hard you try to socially construct an alternative reality by chanting, the science is what it is.
So go ahead and hate male ‘whiteness’ (science) while claiming it’s oppression. You’re just lying to justify magical thinking.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-31 16:46:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587123785588670464
Reply addressees: @Smahtguyz2 @newsmax
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1587122145729167361
-
That’s a social game for status and belonging. It’s not science, and it’s not us
That’s a social game for status and belonging. It’s not science, and it’s not useful.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-31 02:19:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1586905575736180747
Reply addressees: @ladamenoire @Autism1o1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1586899618343882753