Category: Science, Physics, and Philosophy of Science

  • WHY MATHEMATICS IS ONE OF THE SCIENCES Q:Curt –“But, but Math isn’t Science!”–

    WHY MATHEMATICS IS ONE OF THE SCIENCES
    Q:Curt –“But, but Math isn’t Science!”—

    Technically speaking, mathematics falls into the category of formal sciences. The three are Formal (Logic), Physical, and Social(Behavioral). (look it up). In my work I add Evolutionary in order to disambiguate before(physical), during(Social), and after(Evolutionary) states. But that is a matter of epistemic utility, not necessity.

    Your understanding of the definition of ‘science’ is probably a source of error.

    The Criteria for a Science is:

    1. Systematic Inquiry: All sciences employ structured methods to investigate their subject matter, whether through formal proofs, empirical experiments, or statistical analysis.
    2. Evidence-Based: Conclusions are grounded in observable or verifiable evidence, whether that evidence is logical (formal), physical (empirical), or behavioral (social).
    3. Objectivity: Sciences aim for impartiality, minimizing bias through standardized methods, peer review, and replicability (where applicable).
    4. Testability/Falsifiability: Scientific claims are subject to testing or scrutiny, allowing for revision or refutation based on new evidence or reasoning.
    5. Generalizability: Sciences seek to identify patterns, laws, or principles that apply beyond specific cases, whether universal (physical), abstract (formal), or probabilistic (social).

    Note that in my work I emphasize testifiability because all the other criteria are reducible to the dimensions necessary to produce testifiable testimony.

    As such, science emerged in the west, because it emerged out of our law, and our law has been dependent upon testifiability since we were horse raiders on the Steppe.

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-05 23:07:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1919529330130223119

  • WHY MATHEMATICS IS ONE OF THE SCIENCES Q:Curt –“But, but Math isn’t Science!”–

    WHY MATHEMATICS IS ONE OF THE SCIENCES
    Q:Curt –“But, but Math isn’t Science!”—

    Technically speaking, mathematics falls into the category of formal sciences. The three are Formal (Logic), Physical, and Social(Behavioral). (look it up). In my work I add Evolutionary in order to disambiguate before(physical), during(Social), and after(Evolutionary) states. But that is a matter of epistemic utility, not necessity.

    Your understanding of the definition of ‘science’ is probably a source of error.

    The Criteria for a Science is:

    1. Systematic Inquiry: All sciences employ structured methods to investigate their subject matter, whether through formal proofs, empirical experiments, or statistical analysis.
    2. Evidence-Based: Conclusions are grounded in observable or verifiable evidence, whether that evidence is logical (formal), physical (empirical), or behavioral (social).
    3. Objectivity: Sciences aim for impartiality, minimizing bias through standardized methods, peer review, and replicability (where applicable).
    4. Testability/Falsifiability: Scientific claims are subject to testing or scrutiny, allowing for revision or refutation based on new evidence or reasoning.
    5. Generalizability: Sciences seek to identify patterns, laws, or principles that apply beyond specific cases, whether universal (physical), abstract (formal), or probabilistic (social).

    Note that in my work I emphasize testifiability because all the other criteria are reducible to the dimensions necessary to produce testifiable testimony.

    As such, science emerged in the west, because it emerged out of our law, and our law has been dependent upon testifiability since we were horse raiders on the Steppe.

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-05 23:07:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1919529329954062338

  • No large scale studies, but it is a ‘drop in’ replacement for gasoline and they’

    No large scale studies, but it is a ‘drop in’ replacement for gasoline and they’re suggesting no significant differences. EFuel’s octane rating is 85-87. It can be raised easily. But the ‘big deal’ is that is’a 90% co2 reduction – you can’t use the car, garage, and a hose any…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-29 16:42:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917258135972241815

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917256730343321761

  • THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE IS RENEWED? 😉 Dunno if y’all follo

    THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE IS RENEWED? 😉
    Dunno if y’all follow these things, but Porsche’s eFuel, which is a mixture of atmospheric carbon dioxide and hydrogen, is now in production (Chile) – and while it’s about $8 per gallon ($2 per litre), when produced with wind (today) or nuclear (tomorrow) it means that there is a viable alternative to Electric. I love the choice of both. I am not fond of electric vehicles in cold climates or rural destinations, or for ‘working vehicles’. But I’m equally thrilled by the joy of electric cars and busses in urban and suburban density. 😉

    Best of both worlds. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-29 16:26:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917254099130826752

  • Ah. I see. But no, I mean it only as generalizing the first principle such that

    Ah. I see. But no, I mean it only as generalizing the first principle such that it is consistent at all scales from the subatomic world to the most complex of human coordination and conceptualization.

    That joy is a gain (the experience of the presence of resources and the absence of social pressure and the absence of risk) that we sought to acquire for some reason or other, as a form of rest, or more likely, relaxation, comfort, or joy.

    Anything we act to pursue can be expressed as the pursuit of something – all action and some inaction is all pursuit or it would not exist.

    We are part of the physical universe. We work by it’s same rules. We just have memory and the capacity for prediction from it, and choice among those predictions. As such we seek like the rest of the world to acquire what satisfies us.

    This allows us to express all of existence using the same frame of reference. It’s not a value judgement. It’s a system of commensurable description and measurement. 😉

    Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-25 16:30:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1915805654176210944

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1915776691684954147

  • The goal of the behavior whether in advanced life, simple life, biomolecules, mo

    The goal of the behavior whether in advanced life, simple life, biomolecules, molecules, elements, particles, and proto particles, is defeat of entropy by the capture and conversion of energy into rates of persistence.

    This is the purpose of evolutionary computation. It’s all the entire universe does at all scales. Discover stable states and recombinations thereof.

    Humans differ from the rest of the known universe only in that we can adapt faster than all other creatures possessed of less advanced nervous systems.

    Reply addressees: @KinsellaTopher


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-25 04:04:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1915617869079130112

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1915593966575030375

  • “When Galileo invented the telescope people didn’t want to look through it.”– T

    –“When Galileo invented the telescope people didn’t want to look through it.”–

    The quote Doolittle uses highlights a broader human tendency to resist paradigm-shifting tools or ideas, as Galileo’s telescope challenged the geocentric worldview, leading to his conflict with the Catholic Church, which placed him under house arrest in 1633 for supporting heliocentrism.

    This resistance to new evidence mirrors modern parallels, such as initial skepticism toward AI-driven insights like Doolittle’s NLI project, which aims to create a system for detecting “parasitism” in societal structures, forcing accountability through undeniable logic, as described in his related posts.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 03:15:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914880812492972033

  • “When Galileo invented the telescope people didn’t want to look through it.”

    –“When Galileo invented the telescope people didn’t want to look through it.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 03:15:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914880354290467272

  • thinking… Pressure(cause) > Spin(Quanta) > Charge(Physics) > Capacitance (life

    thinking…
    Pressure(cause) > Spin(Quanta) > Charge(Physics) > Capacitance (life) > Cooperation(Multicellular Life) > Work(Morphology, Move) > Transmission(Current, Chem, Molecules, Nerves) > Adaptation(Memory) > Bias(hormones) > ( more of the same ).
    Something of that nature.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 01:06:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914848401570898217

    Reply addressees: @Claffertyshane

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914775244121817515

  • JB: “Science: the Search for testifiable knowledge.”

    JB: “Science: the Search for testifiable knowledge.”


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-22 23:32:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914824760657371441

    Reply addressees: @Plinz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1912611895858864403