It can because there is no evidence of any non deterministic phenomenon (not hard determinism) in the universe. As such all patterns can be reduced to some sort of expression whether it is continous such as mathematics and physics, computational (branching), or simulational (adversarial). There is nothing that is regular that we have found that we cannot reduce if we can observe it. The only things we currently are unsure of are those things we cannot observe at the very large or vary small. We are even encroaching on protiens which as biological machines are the most complex molecules we’ve yet discovered.
You’re wrong. In fact, the universe is so simple it’s intellectually insulting. I’m not arrogant enough to assert that there are turtles all the way down so to speak.
Turtles all the way down. In the end if there is no purpose to the universe, then there is only the accident of persistence by the concentration of energy in defeat of entropy.
If I were to anthropomorphize a purpose of the universe, it would be that it’s a very wasteful process by which to attempt to calculate the transcendence of at least one life form into gods than can save the universe from heat death.
That’s right. Purpose. Purpose requires intent. There is no intent. There is no purpose. All we can determine so far is that it appears that universes (meaning some section of the broader universe) for some reason or other, contract and then explode, and as the explosion dissipates almost all pressure is externalized into space, and a small percentage is concentrated into protoparticles, particles, and the most simple of elements. Then suns form and explode and produce more complex elements. There is no purpose to this. It’s we who determine purpose for ourselves.
You don’t mean ‘objective function’ since it’s just a deterministic result of the quantum background’s need to release pressure by either expansion into space or contraction into mass. What do you mean instead? (I know, but I wonder if you know.)
Every time I incrase the size of my audience I have to educate the newbies: “If I say it, it’s because I know the science”. On the other hand I do run king of he hill games at times (still) – if I want to learn what others think or provide a ‘teaching moment’.
That’s a nonsense argument. Science just means the process of producing testimony. If you can’t testify to it you can’t claim it’s true. Sorry. It’s not complicated. THat’s actually what ‘true’ means. It means ‘his word is as strong as an oak’. Which implies both truth and…
The Pamphlet (of the Laws of the Universe) Screenshot of the section we’re turning into a short book for quick reference and and overview of the laws of the universe. This is not eitehr (a) the full science or (b) the constitution. We will produce the constitution next, and the… https://t.co/CaPPn22hqe
(NLI Update)
This morning Brad and I wrote the introduction to the summary of The Laws – what we internally call ‘The Pamphlet’ – which just lists the ternary logic and laws four all four of the sciences from physics to group evolutionary strategies.
We had originally included a section in The Science volume called ‘the synthesis’ – which would hold this overview. But both our followers and brad in particular felt we needed to publish something sooner that was enough of an overview that our people could begin to evangalize with -and which would establish our academic credibility.
As for the content, Brad has been consistent in keeping the negativas out of it, especially the conflict of civilizations we’re currently embroilded in at the same time as the conflict of the sexes – which is a double whammy for us.
At present I’m not sure where we’ll put the European vs Semitic vs Asian conflict section – whether in the Science volume or possibly the Persecutions volume. The sex differences in conflict and lying is in the Science volume. And I suspect that’s the best place to put it.
I’m not quite settled on this. Because most people, at least the conservatives, want and need the science of the feminine-semitic devolutionary vs masculine european evolutionary content most of all because it’s the cause of the crisis of our age.
Because the semitic and underclass instinct whether in rome and christianity, or in marxism and class warfare (again), and semitic and feminine warfare (again) in the present age are always the problem in every era destroying each civlization it touches.
Any deep and considered thoughts would be appreciated.
Remember we’re thnking of moving markets (factions) not just what you want. But what our people need to achieve a desired end.
