Curt Doolittle

Category: Science, Physics, and Philosophy of Science

  • We can demonstrate, suggest, and convince ourselves that a scientific truth is v

    We can demonstrate, suggest, and convince ourselves that a scientific truth is valid. But proof? That’s an impossibility for science.

  • “general criticism: accusations of reductionism”— Isn’t that a sophist’s non a

    —“general criticism: accusations of reductionism”— Isn’t that a sophist’s non argument? It’s science. It’s true. Now you might make the traditional argument that DEFLATION of the experiential dimensions (reaction) such that we understand the CAUSAL dimensions is precisely the function of testimony (personal), science(natural), and mathematics(relations). So conversely, isn’t the attempt to attribute cause to effect merely an error? (or a deception.) People will make excuses for the preservation of the intuitionistic (animal) in order to avoid the rational (human).

  • “general criticism: accusations of reductionism”— Isn’t that a sophist’s non a

    —“general criticism: accusations of reductionism”— Isn’t that a sophist’s non argument? It’s science. It’s true. Now you might make the traditional argument that DEFLATION of the experiential dimensions (reaction) such that we understand the CAUSAL dimensions is precisely the function of testimony (personal), science(natural), and mathematics(relations). So conversely, isn’t the attempt to attribute cause to effect merely an error? (or a deception.) People will make excuses for the preservation of the intuitionistic (animal) in order to avoid the rational (human).

  • “general criticism: accusations of reductionism”— Isn’t that a sophist’s non a

    —“general criticism: accusations of reductionism”—

    Isn’t that a sophist’s non argument? It’s science. It’s true.

    Now you might make the traditional argument that DEFLATION of the experiential dimensions (reaction) such that we understand the CAUSAL dimensions is precisely the function of testimony (personal), science(natural), and mathematics(relations).

    So conversely, isn’t the attempt to attribute cause to effect merely an error? (or a deception.)

    People will make excuses for the preservation of the intuitionistic (animal) in order to avoid the rational (human).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-27 11:43:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5114511/What-consciousness-not-drives-human-mind.html

  • Untitled

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5114511/What-consciousness-not-drives-human-mind.html

  • Untitled

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5114511/What-consciousness-not-drives-human-mind.html

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-24 19:25:00 UTC

  • Um. The fact that (a) we have always built cities near shores and (b) shores cha

    Um. The fact that (a) we have always built cities near shores and (b) shores change constantly, and (c) we are in what appears to be a glacial minimum, should provide a rather obvious explanation of why there are any number of underwater cities (architecture). Just like there are many buried cities.

    The earth ‘breathes’ like we do, on a fairly regular cycle.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-22 18:59:00 UTC

  • Um. The fact that (a) we have always built cities near shores and (b) shores cha

    Um. The fact that (a) we have always built cities near shores and (b) shores change constantly, and (c) we are in what appears to be a glacial minimum, should provide a rather obvious explanation of why there are any number of underwater cities (architecture). Just like there are many buried cities. The earth ‘breathes’ like we do, on a fairly regular cycle.

  • Um. The fact that (a) we have always built cities near shores and (b) shores cha

    Um. The fact that (a) we have always built cities near shores and (b) shores change constantly, and (c) we are in what appears to be a glacial minimum, should provide a rather obvious explanation of why there are any number of underwater cities (architecture). Just like there are many buried cities. The earth ‘breathes’ like we do, on a fairly regular cycle.