Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • It’s very hard to ‘science’ that set of sentences, since the terms are themselve

    It’s very hard to ‘science’ that set of sentences, since the terms are themselves pseudoscientific. Instead there is a tendency of christian sects to vary by trinitarian metaphysics, giving priority differently to each vertex. But if we science this trinity it’s a reflection of trifunctionalism, which is a reflection of the sex differences, and in turn the equilibration of the universe. So Instead of that abstraction, if we science the method of argument: theology/pilpul, sophistry/philosophy, dialectical materialism/critique, vs testimony/science etc, what we end up with is the masculine vs feminine spectrum of truth to deceit, and just a spectrum of means of lying. So it doesn’t matter what people claim, it matters more the method of how they claim it. And they claim it mostly to lie.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 21:16:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640100449503137794

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640097330706751488

  • It’s a good take. Now, figure out where hegel came from and you’ll find christia

    It’s a good take.
    Now, figure out where hegel came from and you’ll find christianity. And find out where that came from and you’ll find judaism. And find out where that came from and it’s the feminine intuition. We’ll need a lot more detailed genetics to explain why the semitic peoples have been accused of the feminine mind for most of written history. I’m reasonably confident I know the answer, but we need better data.

    Reply addressees: @superkanga


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 20:46:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640092947541630976

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640090850272133121

  • It’s a good take. Now, figure out where hegel came from and you’ll find christia

    It’s a good take.
    Now, figure out where hegel came from and you’ll find christianity. And find out where that came from and you’ll find judaism. And find out where that came from and it’s the feminine intuition. We’ll need a lot more detailed genetics to explain why the semitic peoples have been accused of the feminine mind for most of written history. I’m reasonably confident I know the answer, but we need better data.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 20:46:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640092947646390274

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640090850272133121

  • INTERESTING: WHICH MOVIES? Just as there is a difference betwen fiction and lite

    INTERESTING: WHICH MOVIES?
    Just as there is a difference betwen fiction and literature, there is a difference between a good movie – entertaining and interesting, and a good mythology – deep and meaningful across time. Or what those of us in the last generation educated in the high arts call ‘high art’: mythology.

    And, I can’t really identify many.

    Certainly:
    2001 (new divinity, infinity)
    Blade Runner (life)
    Its a Wonderful Life (moral choice)
    Gone With The Wind (love amidst chaos)
    The Godfather (loyalty)
    Lawrence of Arabia (grand heroism)
    (ie: long time preference)

    And Maybe:
    Gladiator / Kingdom of Heaven (honor)
    Count of Monte Christo (dedication over time)
    Dances with Wolves (simplicity)
    Apocalypse Now / Saving Private Ryan / Full Metal Jacket / Platoon (war)
    No Country for Old Men (evil, the devil, temptation)
    (ie: aristocracy)

    And Not:
    I’ve come to understand the ‘mythology’ of 20th century literature, perhapse going back as far as Dickens, is largely the work of seditions by sympathizers with communism and socialism in their hatred of modernity – and not a contribution to western literary history. Just as the woke movement has destroyed western myth, literature, and entertainment since 2009. So while I want to recommend many other films, such as Citizen Kane as a work of cinematic innovation – thats all those otherwise great works might be.

    As in many things, this is a class thing. 😉

    Reply addressees: @ContraFabianist @EPoe187


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-25 01:06:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639433645864656900

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639401219281281024

  • INTERESTING: WHICH MOVIES? Just as there is a difference betwen fiction and lite

    INTERESTING: WHICH MOVIES?
    Just as there is a difference betwen fiction and literature, there is a difference between a good movie – entertaining and interesting, and a good mythology – deep and meaningful across time. Or what those of us in the last generation educated in the high arts call ‘high art’: mythology.

    And, I can’t really identify many.

    Certainly:
    2001 (new divinity, infinity)
    Blade Runner (life)
    Its a Wonderful Life (moral choice)
    Gone With The Wind (love amidst chaos)
    The Godfather (loyalty)
    Lawrence of Arabia (grand heroism)
    (ie: long time preference)

    And Maybe:
    Gladiator / Kingdom of Heaven (honor)
    Count of Monte Christo (dedication over time)
    Dances with Wolves (simplicity)
    Apocalypse Now / Saving Private Ryan / Full Metal Jacket / Platoon (war)
    No Country for Old Men (evil, the devil, temptation)
    (ie: aristocracy)

    And Not:
    I’ve come to understand the ‘mythology’ of 20th century literature, perhapse going back as far as Dickens, is largely the work of seditions by sympathizers with communism and socialism in their hatred of modernity – and not a contribution to western literary history. Just as the woke movement has destroyed western myth, literature, and entertainment since 2009. So while I want to recommend many other films, such as Citizen Kane as a work of cinematic innovation – thats all those otherwise great works might be.

    As in many things, this is a class thing. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-25 01:06:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639433645994680324

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639401219281281024

  • RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle Where the utility of religion and philosophy

    RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle Where the utility of religion and philosophy exceeds that of science, is in the production of predictiv…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 17:59:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638238842753806355

  • Q: IS A TRUE, ETHICAL, MORAL, AND “GOOD” RELIGION POSSIBLE? If we made a ‘religi

    Q: IS A TRUE, ETHICAL, MORAL, AND “GOOD” RELIGION POSSIBLE?
    If we made a ‘religion’ of laws of nature, natural law of cooperation, our intergenerational debts to nature, heroes, ancestors(archetypes), civilization(traditions and institutions), and to one another (civil society), and stoic discipline (cognitive behavioral training), and where those laws are a standard of weights and measures, and our debts were weights and measure of our behaviors, then how would that religion vary from teaching all of us the truth of the universe, man, and civilization, and how to function optimally in it? Isn’t social repetition of oath and ritual but testimony and promise that we will limit ourselves to that which is mutually beneficial? It sure appears that a true, ethical, moral, and good religion is possible. But those who practice false, unethical, immoral, and not-good religions will resist – of course. Because they don’t know that their religions are false, unethical, immoral, and not=good. Yet they are addicted to them because it is how they intuit the right and wrong of their own behaviors. And they fear doing differently.

    Reply addressees: @FrankRe07770590 @erikbrus25


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 20:19:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637911738002690050

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637909279700033536

  • Q: IS A TRUE, ETHICAL, MORAL, AND “GOOD” RELIGION POSSIBLE? If we made a ‘religi

    Q: IS A TRUE, ETHICAL, MORAL, AND “GOOD” RELIGION POSSIBLE?
    If we made a ‘religion’ of laws of nature, natural law of cooperation, our intergenerational debts to nature, heroes, ancestors(archetypes), civilization(traditions and institutions), and to one another (civil society), and stoic discipline (cognitive behavioral training), and where those laws are a standard of weights and measures, and our debts were weights and measure of our behaviors, then how would that religion vary from teaching all of us the truth of the universe, man, and civilization, and how to function optimally in it? Isn’t social repetition of oath and ritual but testimony and promise that we will limit ourselves to that which is mutually beneficial? It sure appears that a true, ethical, moral, and good religion is possible. But those who practice false, unethical, immoral, and not-good religions will resist – of course. Because they don’t know that their religions are false, unethical, immoral, and not=good. Yet they are addicted to them because it is how they intuit the right and wrong of their own behaviors. And they fear doing differently.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 20:19:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637911738141007874

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637909279700033536

  • Religion=Empathizing, vs Law=Systematizing So, religion is necessary for Feminin

    Religion=Empathizing, vs Law=Systematizing

    So, religion is necessary for Feminine minds – at least, feminine minds that need the social confirmation (social construction).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 19:55:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637905797446287360

    Reply addressees: @FrankRe07770590 @erikbrus25

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637863972635303951

  • Q: CURT: “DO RELIGIONS NEED LIES? AND WHY DO WE NEED RELIGIONS?” The reason you

    Q: CURT: “DO RELIGIONS NEED LIES? AND WHY DO WE NEED RELIGIONS?”
    The reason you need lies is the instinctual demand for mindfulness provided by hunter-gatherer family clan tribe, socialization, regularity, and simplicity. Yet we the cost of anonymity and irrelevancy and loss of that dependency produces mindlessness we call alienation and anxiety and inability to cope with the reality of a universe, which is a vast irradiated wasteland, solar system, a sun, a geology, a climate, a fauna and the other humans that are all but hostile to our very existence, and try to eradicate us with disturbing regularity.
    The question man must solve, is how to provide that mindfulness by means that are not false, and not harmful to our continuous adaptation to these environments, and the environments we innovate with our science, technology, and knowledge – despite status (after food and shelter) being our primary instinct that influences all our behaviors.
    Stoicism, Confucianism, Shintoism, and Buddhism were the least false religions. Hinduism is an eccentric outlier that while brilliant and innovative eventually proved an impediment to the people. And The Abrahamic spectrum are the most false and most harmful religions that were a detriment to the people and all those they interacted with. At least until the marxist spectrum which are the most harmful cults since the mesoamerican cults of institutional murder.
    But there is something to be learned from these means of producing mindfulness. Perhaps the Chinese tea and Japanese craftsman rituals. Perhaps the stoic rituals – which are but what today we call cognitive behavioral therapy. The explicit pursuit of mindfulness through non-aggression in Buddhism – despite it’s abandonment of reality.
    We can, at least I can, at present describe requirements for a scientific non false religion for the political, social, and personal problems of alienation and neuroticism. At that point, like Hinduism, stoicism, or Confucianism, is such a thing a religion? Or is it an intergenerational set of narratives and values that provide mindfulness by teaching us a way of life that benefits all of us? I think the latter.
    So, to say we need religion is a half-truth. Humans need mindfulness. There are a spectrum of solutions to providing humans with mindfulness. We need only discover those that are not false, and do not produce direct harms, or indirect harms through negative externalities.
    Train the body (fitness), the mind (mindfulness), the habits (hygiene, dress, manners, ethics, morals, norms, natural law), the brain (the basics of the disciplines (means of ‘calculating’) from reason to physical, behavioral, evolutionary sciences), the individual (skills that are useful for contributing to self sufficiency). We need to train the whole person. Not take it for granted that idiosyncratic experience will provide the fitness in body, mind, habits, brain, and sills needed for self determination by self determined means in a condition of mindfulness and appreciation for not only this life, but our investment in one another’s fulfillment.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 15:40:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637841536892239872