“In my opinion, the central goal of Judeo-Christian ethics is to nurture a community within which adults can recreate the happiness of childhood.” – Kenneth Allen Hopf
Source date (UTC): 2013-12-22 12:59:00 UTC
“In my opinion, the central goal of Judeo-Christian ethics is to nurture a community within which adults can recreate the happiness of childhood.” – Kenneth Allen Hopf
Source date (UTC): 2013-12-22 12:59:00 UTC
WHAT IF THE ARABS ARE RIGHT?
What if, Arabic Paternalism under Islam, is not the most backward reproductive family system – but in fact, the most mature? What if, as others have suggested, the Greeks invented inbreeding to keep property in the family as a reaction to the disintegrating state amidst urban diversity? And the arabs adopted it as part of their conquest of the eastern roman empire?
What if an individualistic, highly distributed division of labor and a mobile work force, is a reproductive ‘dead end’?
And that ‘their way’, with all it’s defects, is in fact, the natural course of all cultures as they mature?
Source date (UTC): 2013-12-12 12:52:00 UTC
THE ONLY WAY TO REFORM ISLAM: BAN COUSIN MARRIAGE OUT TO SIX GENERATIONS.
It’s not complicated.
Source date (UTC): 2013-11-29 09:01:00 UTC
http://www.africanglobe.net/africa/african-state-angola-bans-islam-mosques-destroyed/ANGOLA BANS ISLAM
Source date (UTC): 2013-11-25 09:17:00 UTC
SAVED BY CHURCH AND GOD. SAVED BY ACADEMIA AND STATE.
There isn’t any difference you know.
Universities were extensions of the church, and with the decline of the church, the university has replaced the church as the source of civic religion, and the promise of prosperity.
But, going to college doesn’t, it turns out, teach you much. It just sorts us into how much hard work we can adapt to in any given period of time.
And it turns out that the church didn’t save you, and academia didn’t save you.
We rebelled against the little slips of paper the church gave out. We are rebelling against the little slips of paper academia has given out.
Why is it that the church doesn’t warranty your access to heaven, or academia your access to prosperity?
If you could take them to court like any other merchant, what would change in both church (premodern religion) and academia (the modern and postmodern religion)?
If someone will not warrant their goods, what does that say about them and their goods?
Fraud is fraud.
Source date (UTC): 2013-11-25 04:37:00 UTC
SCIENCE AS RELIGION : THE CIVIC SOCIETY : THE CONTRAST OF BUDDHISM
Science helps us understand causality:
(a) incentives.
(b) repetition.
(c) emergent behavior
(d) unintended consequences.
I complain about most mystical religions for the same reason. Buddhism is the least bad of the bad.
A friend just posted excerpts from the Dali Lama’s book. And while I find practitioners non-threatening, the argument troubles me. The argument that we should unite science and religion. Because the tradition in buddhist thought is that we explore the self. But, it is much less the process of exploration than it is the process of manufacture. The mind is emergent, not existent.
If we look at the incentives it is a less political religion, because it is a more personal philosophy. We tend to attribute to buddhism less harm, because it is a personal, rather than political philosophy: a reformation of hinduism from the political to the personal.
But there is no need to reconcile religion and science. We have. History as mythology. Heroes as gods. Politics as ritual. Science as personal philosophy. The participatory civil society so unique to the west. The civil society that our government, like the Chinese government, has actively destroyed by exporting responsibility for society to the bureaucracy.
Now, it may be that this pagan religion of history, science and reason is focused on the group rather than the self. And it may be that this pagan religion is non-platonic. And it may be that this pagan religion is less INTUITIVE, but equally EMERGENT, and produces superior EXTERNALITIES by focusing human thought on cooperation, rather than introspection.
It may be that this pagan religion is an aristocratic religion and that the buddhism, like most other religions, must be allegorical because it is not possible for all humans to grasp science and reason.
It may be that the aristocratic political, and the commoner-introspective, are compatible. But I do not think that the civil society can tolerate it. And I this one of the reasons that buddhism feels more acceptable today to us – we have surrendered the civil society to the state, and become subjects, and can NO LONGER FIND SATISFACTION by participating in the civil society.
Buddhism is escapism. Powerlessness. Acceptance of the world as it is. It masks the ease of intuitive internal obsession as the excuse not to engage in the difficulty of unintuitive, contemplation. It is so because the individual is indeed POWERLESS in the imperial bureaucratic society. Just as he is POWERFUL in the civil, participatory, society.
Western man seeks to transform the world to his will. Eastern to accept and conform to the world. This is the fundamental difference between our cultures. They submit. We participate.
The emergent mind in the practice of science produces the Flynn effect of making us all constantly smarter. And wealthier. And more healthy.
The reason we are in conflict is that we are both scientifically AND we have surrendered the CIVIL SOCIETY to the BUREAUCRATIC STATE, and as such we seek a new religion, because our real religion CIVIC PARTICIPATION has been taken from us, in order to create worship of the state.
The state did not kill christianity. Christianity was just ritual. The state killed our civic society.
If you grasp this the will understand the interrelatedness of our mental models of the world, and the trivial simplicity of the organized religions compared to the CIVIL SOCIETY of the west, which, operating as city states of extended families, created the high trust society, and all the prosperity that came from it.
– Curt Doolittle. Kiev.
NOTE
Allegorical language is the language of deception. It may be the language of self-deception. It may be the language of political deception. But it is the vehicle for deception. Science speaks in operational language so that we cannot so easily engage in deception under the guise of inarticulate language.
Operational language
Historical Language
Allegorical Langauge
Mystical Language
Source date (UTC): 2013-10-18 04:25:00 UTC
I met an orthodox priest (Decon?) a few months ago, walking down the street. Elderly. One cataract covered eye. Perfect english. And he had that magic that wise old priests used to have when they were our educated class.
I wish the church had allowed marriage, and adopted to modernity by teaching all european history as moral lessons. But they took poverty as an intrinsic good, rather than as a necessary means of ensuring individual commitment to society which was during most of its history, poor.
We left our church sure. But our church abandoned us in favor of developing nations.
Now we have Academia, Totalitarian Humanism, Marxism. And the church is no longer our institutional opposition to the state. We no longer have an independent moral institutional framework to separate us from the judicial and military institutions.
We destroyed that balance of power. Then the Feminists allied with the marxists and destroyed the family.
Sad.
Source date (UTC): 2013-10-07 04:24:00 UTC
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2013/09/the-silence-of-our-friends-the-extinction-of-christianity-in-the-middle-east/THE EXTERMINATION OF CHRISTIANITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST.
Coming as the extinction of secular democracy to a city near you!
🙂
Source date (UTC): 2013-10-06 11:35:00 UTC
More on Buddhism’s strange attraction to the mentally ill.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/shooters-interest-in-buddhism-prompts-debate-about-stereotype-of-peaceful-faith/2013/09/18/f0ecd938-1fcf-11e3-94a2-6c66b668ea55_story.html
Source date (UTC): 2013-09-18 13:38:00 UTC
Now, I’m going to go out on a limb here, and say that christianity must be divided into european and middle eastern content. And that, with Chivalry, the middle eastern content is irrelevant, and would best be abandoned.
ARISTOCRACY gave us:
——————-
Private Property
Individualism
Heroism (sacrifice for the greater good)
The purpose of man is to bend nature to his will.
Objective Truth
Reason
History
Science
Mathematics
Enfranchisement
Civic Duty
Politics
Houses of Classes
ANGLO SAXONS GAVE US
———————–
Poetry, Riddle, Pagan Mythology, Worship of Land and Nature
The Common Law
CHRISTIANITY gave us:
——————-
Legitimate Laws (natural rights)
Property Rights for Women
Mandatory Outbreeding (universalism)
Chivalry (Heroism in service rather than defense or conquest)
PROTESTANTISM gave us:
———————-
The Nuclear Family
Eugenic Reproduction
Universal Private Property Rights
The Work Ethic (Work as Virtue)
Source date (UTC): 2013-09-08 10:01:00 UTC