@AssOfBalaam A desirable verbal deception by repeating it using new media in both eras – all for control – the reason religion was invented.
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-09 06:24:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/740791584107732993
@AssOfBalaam A promise of eternal (impossible) life in the first, and the promise of eternal (impossible) prosperity in the second. *Lies*.
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-09 06:22:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/740791053205286913
What is the difference between the great mystical lie of monotheism, and the great pseudoscientific lie of marxists?
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-09 06:19:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/740790334435807232
Reply addressees: @excarcini @AssOfBalaam
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/740789608728940544
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/740789608728940544
I made an assertion.Defeat it.Nicea was called by Justinian to force a totalitarian church after Roman law failed.
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-09 06:18:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/740790199932878852
Reply addressees: @excarcini @AssOfBalaam
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/740789608728940544
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/740789608728940544
Texto original de Curt Doolittle Traducido al castellano por Alberto R. Zambrano U. [L]os rituales sagrados (del templo y la iglesia en particular) nos recompensan de la espiritualidad y demás señales influyentes a cambio de aprender la habilidad de suprimir nuestros impulsos. Los rituales más agresivos y exigentes son aquellos que el Islam impone, una multitud de exigencias y repeticiones diarias, el judaísmo impone exigencias intelectuales, el cristianismo lo hace de una forma muy poco exigente y desorganizada, el budismo lo hace de forma espiritual, la forma más ritual son las religiones japonesas del shinto y el budismo, y la forma más difícil y beneficiosa es el estoicismo combinado con el empírico aristotélico de la las leyes y la ciencia. Estos rituales son necesarios en todas las sociedad por ninguna otra razón más que entrenarnos para mostrar piedad (respeto) por nuestros bienes. Los occidentals fueron capaces de desarrollar bienes en algún sentido porque la iglesia suprimió sus impulsos por medio de sus rituales. Lo sagrado es igual a aquello que yo no debo imponer a nadie sin importar el costo.
Texto original de Curt Doolittle Traducido al castellano por Alberto R. Zambrano U. [L]os rituales sagrados (del templo y la iglesia en particular) nos recompensan de la espiritualidad y demás señales influyentes a cambio de aprender la habilidad de suprimir nuestros impulsos. Los rituales más agresivos y exigentes son aquellos que el Islam impone, una multitud de exigencias y repeticiones diarias, el judaísmo impone exigencias intelectuales, el cristianismo lo hace de una forma muy poco exigente y desorganizada, el budismo lo hace de forma espiritual, la forma más ritual son las religiones japonesas del shinto y el budismo, y la forma más difícil y beneficiosa es el estoicismo combinado con el empírico aristotélico de la las leyes y la ciencia. Estos rituales son necesarios en todas las sociedad por ninguna otra razón más que entrenarnos para mostrar piedad (respeto) por nuestros bienes. Los occidentals fueron capaces de desarrollar bienes en algún sentido porque la iglesia suprimió sus impulsos por medio de sus rituales. Lo sagrado es igual a aquello que yo no debo imponer a nadie sin importar el costo.
I don’t really understand the difference between:
A comforting lie that there exists a supernatural being that grants us paradise after death if we obey priests in life.
A comforting lie that we were and are oppressed and able to achieve whatever we wish in life, rather than that our ancestors were domesticated by the same process as our livestock and for the same reasons.
The comforting lie that democratic majoritarianism produces prosperity rather than discipline, hard work, nuclear families, and suppression of reproduction by the lower classes produces such prosperity that the luxury of democratic production of commons is an affordable and peaceful way of distributing the spoils.
A comforting lie that if we pay for papers our sins will be forgiven and we can still gain entrance to paradise after death.
The comforting lie that representative agents will act in the interests of people whose disparate interests they cannot understand rather than in the interests of rose who helped them obtain a position where they can choose to act in whomever’s interest he chooses.
A comforting lie that if we pay for a parchment and memorize postmodern scripture that we will socially and economically join the middle or upper middle class.
The comforting lie that women and men are even vaguely equal in perception ability and interest rather than compatible in a reproductive, productive and perceptive division of labor.
History is replete with comforting lies.
All of these lies serve a single purpose: to obtain by fraud that which could be obtained by fully informed productive, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of negative externality at much higher cost.
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-03 10:29:00 UTC
There is nothing in the bible that made the church good. They could have read greek legends and done good with them. It’s the ritual that matters, not the content. What the church spread was literacy, and diplomacy, and eventually natural law. The rest was a bucket of catastrophic lies. What’s the difference between the Apostles, the Council of Nicaea, The Pulpit, and Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Media? Nothing The Apostles, the Council of Nicaea, The Pulpit, were invented to defeat the aristocracy using false promises to rally women and proles. Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Media were used to defeat aristocracy, by using false promises to rally women and proles.
There is nothing in the bible that made the church good. They could have read greek legends and done good with them. It’s the ritual that matters, not the content. What the church spread was literacy, and diplomacy, and eventually natural law. The rest was a bucket of catastrophic lies. What’s the difference between the Apostles, the Council of Nicaea, The Pulpit, and Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Media? Nothing The Apostles, the Council of Nicaea, The Pulpit, were invented to defeat the aristocracy using false promises to rally women and proles. Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Media were used to defeat aristocracy, by using false promises to rally women and proles.
WE ALREADY HAD THE SECOND COMING, AND IT WAS AS CATASTROPHICALLY TRAGIC FOR MANKIND AS THE FIRST TIME AROUND. **What’s the difference between the Apostles, the Council of Nicaea, The Pulpit, and Boaz/Freud/Marx, The Frankfurt School, the Media? Nothing.*** The difference is one of technological sophistication. The great lies of Jewish and Christian Mysticism, and the great lies of Secular Pseudoscience.