Curt Doolittle

Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • YES CHRISTIANITY CAN SURVIVE SOVEREIGNTY 1) We cannot outlaw analogy, poetry, pa

    YES CHRISTIANITY CAN SURVIVE SOVEREIGNTY

    1) We cannot outlaw analogy, poetry, parable, myth, literature, and history, because they are the only possible means of pedagogy. We can however outlaw analogy, poetry, parable, myth, literature, and history that encourages the violation of natural law. Education and dispute resolution are two different things. Education must be meaningful, ethical and moral, dispute resolution must be true, ethical, and moral.

    2) If you do not attempt to use analogy, poetry, parable, myth, literature, and history, it in legislation and law, then Christianity is compatible with natural law. We already do not (and rarely have) allowed analogy, poetry, parable, myth, literature, and history in legislation and law.

    3) the seventh-day mandate is to limit the state, and limit employers, and limit slave owners from exhausting the population.

    4) –All men are sinners from birth–

    All men are rational at birth. It is through training and discipline that we limit their actions to those that are BOTH rational and productive, rather than merely rational.

    I don’t mind counter-signaling because it just provides opportunities to demonstrate and correct ignorance and a lack of understanding.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 11:59:00 UTC

  • THE WESTERN POLYTHEISTIC TRADITION A well trained stupid dog is still a joy arou

    THE WESTERN POLYTHEISTIC TRADITION

    A well trained stupid dog is still a joy around the house.

    A thoroughly Christianized prole is still a virtuous citizen.

    I”m not ant-christian. It’s awesome mythology. I”m non anti-church, it’s necessary competition for the state.

    I’m anti mysticism, pseudorationalsm, pseudoscience, and deceit.

    THE CLASSES AND POLYTHEISM

    Christianity(peasantry) ->

    ……. Rites and Paganism(knights) ->

    …………….Science and Biography (scientists and academics)

    ……………………..Common Law and Literature(burghers) ->

    ……………………………….Natural Law and History(Judges and Kings)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 10:27:00 UTC

  • CHRISTIANITY As long as Christianity is compatible with natural law, and Christi

    CHRISTIANITY

    As long as Christianity is compatible with natural law, and Christian arguments in the commons are made with natural law, it’s merely a language of allegorical mythology.

    I clearly prefer the pagan to the Christian.I understand the superiority of the greek and roman over the pagan. But as far as I know the Pagan, Greek, Roman, and Christian are compatible with natural law.

    Morality is not determined by whether we argue by analogy, or history, or reason, or science, or testimony. It is that whether regardless of the language we use, the argument is reducible to conformation to natural law.

    Thou shalt not impose a cost upon others directly or indirectly except by productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-22 13:41:00 UTC

  • HOMER IS THE FOUNDER OF THE WEST’S RELIGION My position on homer is that he inve

    HOMER IS THE FOUNDER OF THE WEST’S RELIGION

    My position on homer is that he invented the heroic religion of western civilization by capturing in a narrative the ambitions of the aristocratic peoples. So I see homer, as the original author of the west’s bible, and all the greeks and our scientists, lawyers and philosophers as contributors. Our downfall is that we did not sythesize that corpus before the christians destroyed the civilization, but that now we are in a position to do so.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-21 13:01:00 UTC

  • “We Declare the British Isles, in their Totality, as Sacred Ground”

    “We Declare the British Isles, in their Totality, as Sacred Ground”

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-12 17:56:00 UTC

  • OF OTHER RELIGIONS IS EVIDENCE OF OUR REPEAT OF OTHER CIVILIZATION’S FAILURES I

    https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link?a=2i7GkX7bIYc&u=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DfKe600qHEAg%26feature%3DshareADOPTION OF OTHER RELIGIONS IS EVIDENCE OF OUR REPEAT OF OTHER CIVILIZATION’S FAILURES

    I would offer this alternative explanation to the author of the video:

    1) Westerners and easterners evolved in different ‘economies’ so to speak: westerners had small populations, with small farms, and pastorialism, a homogenous (single-ethnic) people, with harsh winters (intolerant climate), lacking any extremely productive resource (seasonal flooding that could be organized into irrigation through ‘slave’ labor). A culture with mostly heads of small businesses, requiring constant choices, seeking solutions.

    Conversely, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Hrappa, and Yang-tse, rivers were all open to irrigation and farming during cyclical, silt-replenishing floods. So (colder)westerners developed self-organizing Sovereignty, and (warmer)easterners developed authoritarian, organized (industriralized) farming. A culture with mostly slaves, lacking choices, seeking escapism.

    2) Western Philosophy evolved as a sovereign, aristocratic(propertied) discipline, for aristocratic(propertied) classes, for the purpose of RULE(profiting from organizing production). This rule includes: Rule of self(Sovereignty), Rule of household, Rule of business(farming, manufacture, and trade), and Rule of the Polity.

    When we are ruling self, household, business, and polity, we must place higher demands (value) upon our correspondence with reality, emotional tolerance for correspondence with reality, and continuous adaptation to reality, that we place upon interpreting reality in a way that lessens our emotional, intellectual, and physical burdens.

    In the west, we avoid conflation of disciplines and as such, we produced class-specializations in our ways of thinking:

    – Elites: Rule/law/war,

    – Upper: Finance/commerce/contract,

    – Middle: knowledge/reason/philosophy/morality, and

    – Working/Lower: religion/theology.

    Each depends upon the rest: an integrated polytheism of sorts. We preserved the competition between these disciplines. We preserve the sovereignty of each. And we do so because each represents the needs of the classes that they serve the interests of. The west(small manors and farms) never developed totalitarianism as did the east(industrialized flood-river farming), because we preserved sovereignty, so it was never necessary of the west to engage in conflationary argument as the east has done.

    3) Organized Religion and Eastern Philosophy evolved as a REACTION to the invention of Sovereignty and Rule. (Sovereignty ==> Zoroaster > Hinduism > Buddhism, and Polytheism > Authoritarian Monotheism > Scriptural Monotheism). There are many reasons for this reaction, but in large part, it is that sovereignty is a eugenic evolutionary strategy with upward redistribution of resources. While eastern socialism is a dysgenic evolutionary strategy.

    4) The west *DID* have it’s own version of Buddhism(mental discipline): Stoicism. And it was widely practiced until the schools were closed by the forcible conversion of the empire to Christianity in order to bring Oriental authoritarian mysticism into the declining empire. Why? Becuase it is very expensive to create truthful, empirical, high trust sovereign rule of law, and it is very cheap to create deceitful, mystical, low trust, authoritarian scripturalism. Reason requires voluntarily adopted education, and mysticism requires only ritualistic indoctrination.

    5) In modernity, we are saturated by information (most of which is false), and competition, An absence of norms in which we can find an identity, and our families have been destroyed by feminist legal activism, our intergenerational families have been destroyed through migratory labor and immigration. People live alone and lonely in boxes. Instead of the german model where they use building codes to produce cities with family sized apartments, we have spread people either in isolated suburbs, or limited reproduction in our cities by maximizing revenue per square inhabited meter – the result being that American and British Cities are IQ-sinks and Unused-Ovary graveyards.

    6) So I ask a different question: Why is it that we take the evidence of escapist eastern philosophy as a success, rather than its adoption means that we are replicating the east’s failures, and regressing to their authoritarianism and lack of choice?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-09 07:28:00 UTC

  • Fallen Angel vs Rising Beast

    11402340_10102719571463899_603079637725510922_o.jpg

  • Fallen Angel vs Rising Beast

    11402340_10102719571463899_603079637725510922_o.jpg

  • The Church Failed To Reform And The Sciences Didn’t Have Time To Complete Their Evolutionary Program

    I mean, another way to look at the 20th century is that in response to Darwin, Maxwell, Spencer, (a) the church failed to reform in response by stating that god and natural and physical laws were the same expression of his divinity, and (b) our intellectual class failed to synthesize operationalism as a means of reforming scientific thought-at its new-grand-scale, and (c) the Jewish pseudoscientists (Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor) filled a void that both state, academy, and finance could use to profit from the new wave of democratic voters (customers), students (customers), and consumers (customers) who they could not force to spend down their accumulated cultural and institutional capital.

    We can easily argue that this is the same strategy the ancient Jews took in response to the imposition of (scientific Aryan-universalist) roman law on top of their (mystical authoritarian separatist) Jewish law. I mean, it worked against classical civilization, why wouldn’t it work against restored classical civilization of the enlightenment? Intellectuals provide a product for a market. I am just concerned that we do not let another era of fraudulent defective products like ancient Jewish mysticism and modern Jewish pseudoscience into a civilization where second tier intellectuals, women, and the underclass are all too willing to embrace utter falsehoods at the expense of their civilization and it’s progenitors – and in the case of western civilization, all of human kind that benefits from western creativity. So what we see, is that between the failure of democracy, the progressive failure of Keynesian economics, the failure of Freudian psychology, of Boazian anthropology, of Marxist economics and sociology, and even Cantorian infinity to survive scrutiny by late 20’th and early 21st century science, that we have at least a temporary opportunity to overthrow the Second Great Deceit’s attack on western truth, science, and eugenics. But we have a short time before the second great deceit and it’s customers in women and the underclasses, possess such numbers that we can be forced into another dark age. And that the promise of a eugenic north America, like a eugenic Europe, insulated from the steppe, desert, and jungle, can continue to provide an engine of innovation for mankind. For the simple reason that we pay the high cost of truthfulness: That discipline of eliminating error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, and deceit, that we call ‘science’. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine We must achieve by force what they have achieved in both the ancient and modern world by deceits.

  • The Church Failed To Reform And The Sciences Didn’t Have Time To Complete Their Evolutionary Program

    I mean, another way to look at the 20th century is that in response to Darwin, Maxwell, Spencer, (a) the church failed to reform in response by stating that god and natural and physical laws were the same expression of his divinity, and (b) our intellectual class failed to synthesize operationalism as a means of reforming scientific thought-at its new-grand-scale, and (c) the Jewish pseudoscientists (Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor) filled a void that both state, academy, and finance could use to profit from the new wave of democratic voters (customers), students (customers), and consumers (customers) who they could not force to spend down their accumulated cultural and institutional capital.

    We can easily argue that this is the same strategy the ancient Jews took in response to the imposition of (scientific Aryan-universalist) roman law on top of their (mystical authoritarian separatist) Jewish law. I mean, it worked against classical civilization, why wouldn’t it work against restored classical civilization of the enlightenment? Intellectuals provide a product for a market. I am just concerned that we do not let another era of fraudulent defective products like ancient Jewish mysticism and modern Jewish pseudoscience into a civilization where second tier intellectuals, women, and the underclass are all too willing to embrace utter falsehoods at the expense of their civilization and it’s progenitors – and in the case of western civilization, all of human kind that benefits from western creativity. So what we see, is that between the failure of democracy, the progressive failure of Keynesian economics, the failure of Freudian psychology, of Boazian anthropology, of Marxist economics and sociology, and even Cantorian infinity to survive scrutiny by late 20’th and early 21st century science, that we have at least a temporary opportunity to overthrow the Second Great Deceit’s attack on western truth, science, and eugenics. But we have a short time before the second great deceit and it’s customers in women and the underclasses, possess such numbers that we can be forced into another dark age. And that the promise of a eugenic north America, like a eugenic Europe, insulated from the steppe, desert, and jungle, can continue to provide an engine of innovation for mankind. For the simple reason that we pay the high cost of truthfulness: That discipline of eliminating error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, and deceit, that we call ‘science’. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine We must achieve by force what they have achieved in both the ancient and modern world by deceits.