Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • DO YOU UNDERSTAND YET? ARYANISM: MARKETS IN EVERYTHING? Abrahamism imposes artif

    DO YOU UNDERSTAND YET? ARYANISM: MARKETS IN EVERYTHING?

    Abrahamism imposes artificial equality where we are only equal if we are slaves. Western religion was originally pagan, meaning a hierarchical family, infinitely extensible, where individuals could find both virtues to imitate, sins to avoid, and advocates for their roles in society at every single level.

    Abrahamism is not a market strategy for a division of knowledge, labor and advocacy among many small extended clans organized into nation states, but an authoritarian and monopolistic one for the production and maintenance of a despotic empire.

    Aryanism *IS* a market strategy, and our original religion provided us with a both a unifying narrative of an extended family with virtues, sins, roles, and interests, custom tailored gods, demi gods, heroes, and great men to appeal to.

    Our god was not demanding, or commanding, or even engaged, but provided wisdom, justice, and decisions in exchange for offerings – *a trade*.

    Do you understand the difference between Aryanism and Semitism yet? Markets and families, vs Monopoly and Empire.

    No excuses. No more lies.

    End the pollution of the west. Imitate the only other superior people on this earth, the east asians, and insulate ourselves from the ‘people of the center’ who failed to transcend from beast to man.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 12:45:00 UTC

  • WESTERN POLYTHEISM AND THE LANGUAGES OF THE CLASSES While truths must exist univ

    WESTERN POLYTHEISM AND THE LANGUAGES OF THE CLASSES

    While truths must exist universally but are invariant (the meaning of a truth), there are also some universal goods (like truth), but many variable and often competing goods (wants and needs).

    And as such we require narratives to explain both the universal truth, the universal good, and the particular goods that are used by each class.

    That said, the strong rule and decide, the burghers organize, produce, distribute, and exchange, and the poor and weak gossip and complain.

    And each tells the story of his class by attributing virtue to his utterances.

    We learn to speak the law of the strong, the philosophy of the utilitarian, and the religion of the weak.

    These are not complicated concepts to master.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-29 12:10:00 UTC

  • Let me help you. Religions provide wisdom, and governments provide laws. If your

    Let me help you. Religions provide wisdom, and governments provide laws. If your religion conflates wisdom with law it is not a religion but a form of government masquerading as a cult. Ergo, if your religion contains laws it is a competitor to, not a compliment to, a government. As such it can be regulated, prohibited, and warred against if necessary.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 20:28:00 UTC

  • RELIGION: – Myths – – Justifications – – Judgements – Festivals – Rituals – – Co

    RELIGION:

    – Myths

    – – Justifications

    – – Judgements

    – Festivals

    – Rituals

    – – Costs (investments)

    – – Submission to the Safety Cult or Tribe

    – – Equality of Interest

    – – Sacredness and Purity.

    – Disciplines

    – – Mindfulness

    – – “Faith”

    Where “Faith” refers to the surrender of reason in to those judgements and justifications and the elimination of the burden of reason, the burden of information gathering, the burden of testing the propositions of others, and the need to defend against the deceptions of others.

    Religion can be produced by either informal traditions, or formal doctrinal traditions.

    Ergo, Religion is a means of providing consistent decidability on a strategy for a group, population, or civilization. The frailty of Religion is that it adapts poorly and slowly.

    PHILOSOPHY

    internally consistent, ideal,…

    LAW

    empirically constructed, internally consistent, externally correspondent, …


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 18:08:00 UTC

  • IF CHRISTIANITY IS DEAD, WE STILL HAVE A PROBLEM Christianity as we know it is d

    IF CHRISTIANITY IS DEAD, WE STILL HAVE A PROBLEM

    Christianity as we know it is dead. The philosophy is exceptional as it seems to create commercial prosperity everywhere it goes. The narratives and the rituals

    So assuming the word ‘philosophy’ means ‘method of decision making’, then of the spectrum of Religion, Political philosophy, Ethical Philosophy, Personal Philosophy, Law, and Science, I would state that transcendence, sovereignty, natural law, male stoicism/female epicureanism, the common empirical law, and Testimonialism are probably the optimum combination for those who wish to LEAD humanity, rather than be led by some other strategy.

    But natural law is skeptical, and incomplete without christian optimism. In other words, christian optimism tells us that if enough of us invest in trust, and tolerate minor losses, we will produce it, and produce outsized gains.

    The problem we face, is we need a binding narrative, and we must distill it from our many authors into our own ‘bible’. Because we learn from loose general principle, to more specific general rule, to more precise rules of science. And without the binding narrative it appears to be very difficult to bind general rules and precise rules of science into a portfolio of decisions across the entire possible spectrum in which we must make decisions.

    I have been struggling with this problem for two years now and while I have my ups and downs, the problem remains the same: without an effort equal to the council of nicea, or the first american constitutional convention, or a frankfurt school, it will be difficult to produce a ‘bible’ of western civilization – a ‘book’ that is necessary if only as a means of defense against the semitic technologies of deception that arose from the innovation of abrahamic deceit. And a ritual that is costly so that men defend the law in that book against all attacks.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 17:27:00 UTC

  • In evaluating our medieval religion, we need to separate the strategy, the philo

    In evaluating our medieval religion, we need to separate the strategy, the philosophy, the mythology, the administration, and the rule.

    And then we must compare it to the alternatives developed in the ancient world, and our traditional religions prior to their destruction by the ancient world.

    The christian religion was a source of ignorance by providing a false high context narrative that impeded the advancement of knowledge, and imposing the ability to rule by deceit.

    The church was a source of (weak) administration.

    The church’s philosophy was adequate for uniting european tribes. But it was not in any way a replacement for greco-roman civilization, or the megalithic-pagan civilization that both so diligently exterminated.

    The church was not in fact all that hostile to science.

    The state was an advocate, and investor in technology.

    The state and the people were more dependent upon law and technology than religion and the church.

    The church informational monopoly then as the academy/media/state monopoly now, tended to produce all the narratives – almost all of which are false histories.

    The restoration of our ancient civilization provided the restoration of our technological knowledge (low context high precision), but what we struggle with today, is providing the narrative (high context low precision) by which we identify and seize opportunities.

    Demonstrably our ancient religion (super-normalism), philosophy (stoicism and epicureanism), epistemology (science, reason, naturalism), cooperation(natural, common, law of torts), and virtues (heroism, truth, goodness and beauty), were superior to the medieval church’s.

    Demonstrably they are superior to all other cultural portfolios.

    Unfortunately, our technology needs a narrative. And the one provided by the cosmopolitans is … to put it bluntly… “Evil”.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 16:14:00 UTC

  • NOT JUST ISLAM BUT ABRAHAMISM: THE INFORMATION DISEASE: THE SOURCE OF IGNORANCE

    NOT JUST ISLAM BUT ABRAHAMISM: THE INFORMATION DISEASE: THE SOURCE OF IGNORANCE AND DECIET

    Um. No. Islam’s destroyed almost all the works of the greeks and romans that they could find. And the reintroduction of greek and roman literature into europe occurred as the academics who were about to be persecuted by the muslims fled to the west for safety.

    Islam, the Black Blague from China, are followed by communism, the mongol golden horde, as the greatest dealers of death. That means that between Abraham’s Judaism, Christianity, and Islamism, and Abraman’s new religion: the Cosmopolitianism of the Ashkenazi (Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, the Frankfurt School, and) that Abrahamism is the most deadly plague every to face humanity. Even MORE SO than the black plague.

    A disease of the mind – from ‘polluted minds’, and a disease of the body (‘from polluted lands’), together are more deadly than any combination of wars in history.

    If we can struggle to end physical diseases, why do we not equally struggle to end informational diseases?

    We can. Natural Law’s Testimonial Truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 13:21:00 UTC

  • As a few have noticed. I was making a fairly serious statement. Not the least of

    As a few have noticed. I was making a fairly serious statement. Not the least of which was de-christianizing the translation of the original quote (which, if I remember correctly was spoken in mongolian, written down phonetically using *chinese* characters, translated into persian, translated into german, and then translated into english. I’m not positive but most of the ‘secret history’ followed that route. )

    Now, in the context in which I made this post, I was trying to illustrate a few things at once:

    1) That hunting man and animal *is* his preferred profession. And that man is not Rousseauian. It is not surprising that all other variations of the semi-sentient apes were exterminated upon our arrival. Nor why the only competition the great plagues have had is Islam first and communism second.

    2) That we have spent a great deal of effort ‘regulating’ man’s preferred profession. And that the many achievements of man were made by suppressing that profession

    3) **BUT**, that to CHOOSE the method of suppressing that profession requires we preserve that profession: hunting, killing, destroying, and taking – we can construct many orders from enslavement on one end to markets on the other.

    4) And to preserve that profession such that we create the advanced order that we have in the ancient and modern worlds requires the Aryan (markets) and the Christian (the extirpation of hatred from the human heart.)

    5) Because there is a vast difference between predation and parasitism of the khan, and the conquest and rule of people by the production of markets through which they transcend the beast, the slave, the serf, the freeman, the civilian, the sovereign – and the god.

    What we have failed to learn (which I am so glad someone reminded me of yesterday) is that having conquered from spain to china, and from the arctic circle to egypt, and having tried to create markets in each of those region, that we failed among all but our own.

    Therefore the evidence suggests that there is something special about our kin group, tribe, and race that makes markets possible.

    But if we must preserve the Aryan and the Christian to rule by natural law, we must also preserve the warrior to obtain and hold the condition of natural law. And we must preserve the warrior hunter’s joy and lust in Aryan and Christian forms, so that those that cannot transcend cannot harm us. If they can harm must they can be weakened. If they cannot be weakened they can be exterminated.

    Not with hatred, and not for profit, but for defense.

    Not for defense of us alone. But for the defense of human kind.

    And the transcendence we are inspired to achieve.

    So as Allan Hernandez said above,

    (a) I want to cause you to attempt to disagree with this statement by stating it provocatively, (remember, this is the purpose of hyperbole that conservatives rely upon. the Asians use contradictions to cause you to think. Aristocracy uses hyperbole to cause you to think.

    (b) I want to force you to face a necessary truth: that violence is just a resource that we can use to create good by the incremental suppression of all means of parasitism – and that to incrementally suppress means of parasitism among hunters, requires that we maintain exceptional skill in hunting, killing, taking, destroying.

    (c) we created this world by mastering, professionalizing, and using violence to obtain and hold rule, through which we imposed markets, and the extirpation of hatred from the human heart.

    I experiment a lot. I run tests. All my arguments are tests. Each test constitutes an attempt to construct a proof. When they are complete (closed), parsimonious, and clear my tests are complete, and a proof constructed.

    But you should not dismiss the difference between an analytic list and an emotive or poetic bit of inspiration. They are attempts to make you (and i) think about those assumptions we hold, beliefs we hold, justifications we feel, and arguments we practice.

    So that not only are markets created, and not only is hatred extirpated, but that ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, pseudorationalism, and pseudoscience, are removed from our thoughts.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 08:12:00 UTC

  • “Judaism functions as fictional moralism by suggestion that enables systemic cre

    —“Judaism functions as fictional moralism by suggestion that enables systemic creation of hazards that can be exploited under the cover of that moral pretense.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 19:34:00 UTC

  • “Islam functions as weaponized hedonism for primitive low-agency males.”– Austy

    –“Islam functions as weaponized hedonism for primitive low-agency males.”– Austyn Pember


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 19:33:00 UTC