Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • What Are Your Thoughts On Politics And Religion?

    THE COMPLETE ANSWER

    I have come to understand that the abrahamic religions are the cause of the dark age, the cause of more deaths than the plagues, and the continuing cause of human suffering, and the greatest threat to human transcendence (evolution).

    RELIGION AND MINDFULNESS

    We all require mindfulness outside of hunter gatherer lifestyles where we know our ‘place’ with everyone around us. We need Personal mindfulness. Interpersonal Mindfulness. And socio-political mindfulness. We evolved as pack animals. A strange mixture of chimp and wolf. We all long for the security of some aspect of the elation, power, comfort, and security of pack. Yet the more advanced our civilizations the more isolated we are as individuals. This was the problem religions solved, and religions solved them by evolving all at about the same time, in response to the needs of living in greater numbers with less certainty in our relations.

    We fail to grasp that religions are vast lies that provide mindfulness. We can achieve mindfulness through intentional discipline, a variety of rituals, participations in feasts, dances, parades, sports, celebrations, and especially in oration, ‘theater’, and Myth.

    But we can obtain that mindfulness by truthful, half truthful, or entirely untruthful means. And there are profound consequences for any people given the means of mindfulness they choose.

    GOVERNMENT AND COMMONS

    As far as I can tell, government is necessary for the production of increasingly complex commons. And mindfulness is necessary for cooperation in those increasingly complex commons.

    But that said, both politics under democracy and religion regardless of political structure are constituted of very little other than utter falsehoods, because both seek power over us and profits from us, by lying.

    If we lived under rule of natural (common) law (of tort), where we extended warraty of due diligence from goods, and services, to political speech, and houses of government were but a market for cooperation between the classes (as in the old english monarchic model) except that we used direct democracy or direct economic democracy, without representatives, and each voted on each issue individually, it is very hard to imagine we would have much use for politics.

    If we were all taught mindfulness like we are taught table manners, reading-writing, arithmetic – even if we had to teach it by half a dozen different means in order to satisfy the needs of peoples with different brain structures, then we would have little need for religion.

    The problem is…. we all love our little lies.

    And in my world, it is the lies that cause all the world’s problems, and justify all the world’s crimes, and encourage all the world’s evil.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-your-thoughts-on-politics-and-religion

  • MAN IN RELATION TO THE GODS ARYAN: A man must struggle against the forces of man

    MAN IN RELATION TO THE GODS

    ARYAN: A man must struggle against the forces of man, beast, and nature to become a god (immortal and powerful).

    PAGAN: Man trades with disinterested gods, (powerful, immortal) and may become a demigod (immortal) thru his actions.

    PROTESTANT(eternal, omniscient, omnipotent): Man can speak to and seek wisdom from a largely benevolent god – risen beast)

    CATHOLIC: Man is a serf begging mercy from a petulant god (eternal, omniscient, and omnipotent – free will to be tamed – fallen angel).

    MUSLIM: Man is a slave of an evil god (eternal, omniscient, omnipotent, deterministic – no free will.)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-26 09:22:00 UTC

  • Man In Relation To The Gods

    ARYAN: A man must struggle against the forces of man, beast, and nature to become a god (immortal and powerful). PAGAN: Man trades with disinterested gods, (powerful, immortal) and may become a demigod (immortal) thru his actions. PROTESTANT(eternal, omniscient, omnipotent): Man can speak to and seek wisdom from a largely benevolent god – risen beast) CATHOLIC: Man is a serf begging mercy from a petulant god (eternal, omniscient, and omnipotent – free will to be tamed – fallen angel). MUSLIM: Man is a slave of an evil god (eternal, omniscient, omnipotent, deterministic – no free will.)
  • Man In Relation To The Gods

    ARYAN: A man must struggle against the forces of man, beast, and nature to become a god (immortal and powerful). PAGAN: Man trades with disinterested gods, (powerful, immortal) and may become a demigod (immortal) thru his actions. PROTESTANT(eternal, omniscient, omnipotent): Man can speak to and seek wisdom from a largely benevolent god – risen beast) CATHOLIC: Man is a serf begging mercy from a petulant god (eternal, omniscient, and omnipotent – free will to be tamed – fallen angel). MUSLIM: Man is a slave of an evil god (eternal, omniscient, omnipotent, deterministic – no free will.)
  • “When accordingly it is inquired, whence is evil, it must first be inquired, wha

    “When accordingly it is inquired, whence is evil, it must first be inquired, what is evil, which is nothing else than corruption, either of the measure, or the form, or the order, that belong to nature.” (Augustine)
  • “When accordingly it is inquired, whence is evil, it must first be inquired, wha

    “When accordingly it is inquired, whence is evil, it must first be inquired, what is evil, which is nothing else than corruption, either of the measure, or the form, or the order, that belong to nature.” (Augustine)
  • The Etruscans (Tuskany) referred to the gods as Aesir as well

    The Etruscans (Tuskany) referred to the gods as Aesir as well….
  • The Etruscans (Tuskany) referred to the gods as Aesir as well

    The Etruscans (Tuskany) referred to the gods as Aesir as well….


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-21 19:37:00 UTC

  • The Etruscans (Tuskany) referred to the gods as Aesir as well

    The Etruscans (Tuskany) referred to the gods as Aesir as well….
  • A Prayer Of Heed

    As a soldier i speak the truth. … it is best for soldiering. As a citizen i follow moral law as best i can. … it is best for prospering. As a craftsman i follow my arts the best i can. … it is best for competing. As a father i follow tradition as best i can. … it is best for parenting. As a man i follow reason as best i can. … it is best for deciding. As a sovereign i follow reciprocity as best i can. … it is best for sovereignty. As a warrior i follow by nothing but my will. So how is it that you speak to me? As soldier, on the subject of truth? As a citizen, on the subject of law? As a craftsman on the subject of competition? As a father on the subject of tradition? As a man on the subject of reason? As a sovereign on the subject of reciprocity? Or as a warrior bound by nothing but my will? Because if we speak of other than truth, prospering, competing, parenting, reasoning, or reciprocity – then i follow, and am bound, by nothing but my will.