Curt Doolittle

Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • Truth benefits all, at the expense of those who lie. All abrahamism is a lie. Al

    Truth benefits all, at the expense of those who lie. All abrahamism is a lie. All people under abrahamism declined.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-18 13:56:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997475987549016064

    Reply addressees: @naifadham @Fourth_stage

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997475193244307460

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/997475193244307460

  • “Everything in this Era causes the Imams to Dance. I think the whole world is re

    –“Everything in this Era causes the Imams to Dance. I think the whole world is ready to deal with Devil so long as it is in his interest. Or even fighting God so long as it is in his interest.”—

    Truth benefits all, at the expense of those who lie. All abrahamism is a lie. All people under abrahamism declined. There is no difference between drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, abrahamic religion, and buddhist religion: It is all to create an environment of lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-18 10:11:00 UTC

  • THE PROBLEM OF SACRILIZATION by Bill Anderson A value system is a fundamental bu

    THE PROBLEM OF SACRILIZATION

    by Bill Anderson

    A value system is a fundamental building block of cooperation, it must be shared by all members of the cooperative group.

    Religion = sacralized value system.

    The US Constitution was an attempt to sacralize a value system integrated with a market system.

    That experiment failed.

    Conclusion: markets are incapable of maintaining a sacralized value system. Market systems are too easily subverted, thus the value system is easily subverted.

    A “pope” is a king (sheriff) whose job is to defend a sacralized value system. The shared and sacralized value system is a necessary but insufficient precondition for civilization, and markets are a necessary but insufficient precondition of western civilization.

    A king is a sheriff whose job is to defend the extended family, known as the nation, and their collective assets (commons).

    Merchant, King, Pope.

    Western civilization depends on the Pope and the King cooperating to defend the commons, while allowing the Merchant to produce unmolested, except where his production consumes the shared value system or the nation’s commons.

    The Merchant must never be freed, he must always be a servant. He must be chained to the Family and to God.

    There can be no “market government”, where the Merchant is King.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-17 18:10:00 UTC

  • Combining Politics and Religion

    —“Politics and religion are different and are extremely hard to mix together”—James Portocarrero Judaism and islam do it. The church was too weak to do it. Chinese never had the problem. WHY: homogeneity = reason. Heterogeneity = Religion. THAT’S THE REASON The problem is heterogeneity (diversity). Religion = Stagnation to create homogeneity that doesn’t exist. Law = Adaptation to change in homogeneity that does exist. REALLY. THAT’S IT. There is a reason for ‘demand’ for religion There is a reason for ‘demand’ for socialization.

  • Combining Politics and Religion

    —“Politics and religion are different and are extremely hard to mix together”—James Portocarrero Judaism and islam do it. The church was too weak to do it. Chinese never had the problem. WHY: homogeneity = reason. Heterogeneity = Religion. THAT’S THE REASON The problem is heterogeneity (diversity). Religion = Stagnation to create homogeneity that doesn’t exist. Law = Adaptation to change in homogeneity that does exist. REALLY. THAT’S IT. There is a reason for ‘demand’ for religion There is a reason for ‘demand’ for socialization.

  • “Look at the difference between Buddha and Marcus Aurelius: Buddha, sitting, wit

    —“Look at the difference between Buddha and Marcus Aurelius: Buddha, sitting, with his eyes closed, mind closed to outside stimuli and the world. Juxtapose Marcus Aurelius, slaughtering barbarians by the hundreds of thousands, engaged with the world, changing it for the better.”— Vincenzo LaSala

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-15 10:28:00 UTC

  • —“You Are Wrong About Gods”–

    I’m not wrong about gods at all. The only question is whether it’s possible for not-quite-humans to function without an imaginary pack leader acting as a unit of measurement. I mean, women demonstrate NAXALT, and men demonstrate INTENTIONALITY, and by both demonstrations we can identify the not-yet-human, not yet possessing agency, and therefore not yet capable of sovereignty. Now, I know why the weak mind needs such lies. But the question is, can we train the weak mind to possess sufficient agency that it does not need these lies. It should be possible for many.

  • —“You Are Wrong About Gods”–

    I’m not wrong about gods at all. The only question is whether it’s possible for not-quite-humans to function without an imaginary pack leader acting as a unit of measurement. I mean, women demonstrate NAXALT, and men demonstrate INTENTIONALITY, and by both demonstrations we can identify the not-yet-human, not yet possessing agency, and therefore not yet capable of sovereignty. Now, I know why the weak mind needs such lies. But the question is, can we train the weak mind to possess sufficient agency that it does not need these lies. It should be possible for many.

  • by Bill Joslin 1 – God exists through the belief of humans and can be measured b

    by Bill Joslin

    1 – God exists through the belief of humans and can be measured by the actions of believers.

    2 – We create God and make God real through our actions.

    3 – We can testify to this truthfully.

    Opposed to:

    1 – God create everything, everything indicates God’s existence.

    The later equates to a metaphysical lie.

    So, if you can have your God without lies.

    Why lie?

    To secure a monopoly on the authority of truth over reality itself.

    To secure opportunity via theft

    No more lies

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 11:28:00 UTC

  • “YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT GODS”– I’m not wrong about gods at all. The only question

    —“YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT GODS”–

    I’m not wrong about gods at all. The only question is whether it’s possible for not-quite-humans to function without an imaginary pack leader acting as a unit of measurement.

    I mean, women demonstrate NAXALT, and men demonstrate INTENTIONALITY, and by both demonstrations we can identify the not-yet-human, not yet possessing agency, and therefore not yet capable of sovereignty.

    Now, I know why the weak mind needs such lies. But the question is, can we train the weak mind to possess sufficient agency that it does not need these lies.

    It should be possible for many.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-13 09:44:00 UTC