RT @Plinz: @Misanfrog @Outsideness atheists being simply the protestants who protest the most
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-09 23:52:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700658451741807080
RT @Plinz: @Misanfrog @Outsideness atheists being simply the protestants who protest the most
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-09 23:52:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700658451741807080
RT @curtdoolittle: @BenZeisloft @saveusculture Only about a third of us can tolerate faith. The rest of us can’t. And trying to do otherwi…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-09 23:41:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700655600080687579
The Innate Urge For Religion
There is an innate need for suppression of neuroticism (worry) in an unpredictable (kaleidc) universe, that is exacerbated by the alienation and anomymity of post-tribal life – it’s simple neural economics. Religion functions as a standard of weights and masures that reduce potential for status counter-signals and individual and group conflict and maximize opportunity for cooperation on the same terms with the same expectations. That’s why all major relivions emerged about the same time, in response to the need to restore cooperation as the world recovered from the bronze age collapse, much the way that literacy helped in the recovery from the plague.
That doesn’t mean we can’t have a non-false religion like stoicism, it only means that some relgions are more costly to train (stoicism, judaism, classical liberalism) than less developed religions that are more resistant to innovation and adaptation.
We need to train mindfulness by some variation of the stoic method in order to restore emotional stability. It’s just work.
Reply addressees: @elonmusk @HbdNrx @TheRabbitHole84
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-09 17:30:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700562388968198144
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699919594579009680
Only about a third of us can tolerate faith. The rest of us can’t. And trying to do otherwise will achieve the opposite. That isn’t going to change. Susceptibility to religiosity is a minority personality trait. If you mean instead, Christian ethics, and the prohibition on…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-09 02:53:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700341632472654097
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699835157610655753
We are all in contact with our imaginations to different degrees, and yes that is where the gods exist. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-08 19:49:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700234828438745089
Reply addressees: @enestatsalvatge @Mrreg14 @bonnittaroy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700234575845159194
It survives only as secular theology by fantasy moral literature which we can demonstrate by example after example as wishful thinking. We may always produce new wants. But otherwise metaphysics, epistemology, (cognitive science), economics,morals,ethics,law,politics, (behavioral science) is fully demarcated from philosophy and I can’t find any exception despite having tried. Science true, philosophy good still preserves philosophy within its domain. But even then is becomes the science of the good over time.
(Please counter as I’m looking for all good counter arguments)
Thank you for your efforts. 🙂
Reply addressees: @philosophytweet
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-08 15:18:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700166693874499584
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700159771049926729
RT @PersonNotGroup: @whatifalthist Christianity is the moral backing of the entire Western system and people that enjoy your geopolitical t…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-08 15:00:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700162159974429070
RT @SRCHicks: Weak comparison:
If one breaks Religious believers down into 10 or more sub-groups (Catholics, Hindus, etc), then one should…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-08 02:54:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699979483883720820
RT @curtdoolittle: @WhereAmIWrong @scrumble_eggs @skullthots @bortisbased @lauferlaw @elonmusk @alx Were the dark ages dark, and Christiani…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 17:26:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699111791278621082
Pretending this is a serious question, Buddha, Jesus in particular but more broadly the Hindu founders and the Muslim founders were trying to find a solution to the suffering of the age of agrarian empires. These were excelllent for the strong but horror for the weak. Religion allowed the sense of virtue for the slaves and underclasses, and provided a cheap method of medicating them while the aristocracies went about their business.
Reply addressees: @JasonReel12
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 00:43:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698859351476166656
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698833085960274390