Curt Doolittle updated his status.
The problem with teaching stoicism is that it’s expensive in teaching-time. Buddhism expensive in personal time. And by comparison religion allows mass production on the cheap.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-02 13:42:46 UTC
The problem with teaching stoicism is that it’s expensive in teaching-time. Buddhism expensive in personal time. And by comparison religion allows mass production on the cheap.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-02 09:42:00 UTC
The problem with teaching stoicism is that it’s expensive in teaching-time. Buddhism expensive in personal time. And by comparison religion allows mass production on the cheap.
The problem with teaching stoicism is that it’s expensive in teaching-time. Buddhism expensive in personal time. And by comparison religion allows mass production on the cheap.
Yes, Peterson has a self authoring course, but not the ‘framing’, and I think Massimo puts books out on the framing but not a course. Effectively speaking stocism is a scientific religion. Or rather a religious and philosophical system that does not conflict with science. In my understanding, we are trying to (by accident) recreate the stoic philosophy (religion). It was quite a while before I understood that’s what I was doing. I think Massimo is doing it intentionally. I haven’t got to peterson yet to ask if he’s knowingly doing it. I have reasons to prefer peterson’s method. My only question is whether or not he should use biblical stories or not. And my preference is ‘no’, because I want to kill abrahamism (sophism) while at the same time preserve literary analogy (wisdom literature)
Yes, Peterson has a self authoring course, but not the ‘framing’, and I think Massimo puts books out on the framing but not a course. Effectively speaking stocism is a scientific religion. Or rather a religious and philosophical system that does not conflict with science. In my understanding, we are trying to (by accident) recreate the stoic philosophy (religion). It was quite a while before I understood that’s what I was doing. I think Massimo is doing it intentionally. I haven’t got to peterson yet to ask if he’s knowingly doing it. I have reasons to prefer peterson’s method. My only question is whether or not he should use biblical stories or not. And my preference is ‘no’, because I want to kill abrahamism (sophism) while at the same time preserve literary analogy (wisdom literature)
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
WHERE DID ALL THE PHILOSOPHERS GO?
The Christian Destruction of Thought.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-01 20:45:42 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
MUST READ. INCREMENTAL PROGRESS IN THE REVERSAL OF ABRAHAMIC DECEITS
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-01 20:34:26 UTC
https://www.panmacmillan.com/blogs/history/catherine-nixey-darkening-age-philosophershttps://www.panmacmillan.com/blogs/history/catherine-nixey-darkening-age-philosophersWHERE DID ALL THE PHILOSOPHERS GO?
The Christian Destruction of Thought.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-01 16:45:00 UTC
https://www.panmacmillan.com/blogs/history/catherine-nixey-darkening-age-philosophersWHERE DID ALL THE PHILOSOPHERS GO?
The Christian Destruction of Thought.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-01 16:45:00 UTC