Universalism. Universalism. Monopoly. Monopoly. Communist monopoly, libertarian monopoly, neocon monopoly = abrahamic monopoly.
THE HERD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS A HERD.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 09:02:00 UTC
Universalism. Universalism. Monopoly. Monopoly. Communist monopoly, libertarian monopoly, neocon monopoly = abrahamic monopoly.
THE HERD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS A HERD.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 09:02:00 UTC
https://www.facebook.com/curt…/posts/1015669432299226NO, THE ABRAHAMIC DARK AGES ARE SOMETHING WE SURVIVED.
I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to not make the mistakes others have made, no matter how frequent.
No, the abrahamic dark ages destroyed all the great civilizations of the ancient world.
Yes, it was the combination of plague and raids that weakened the roman empire.
Yes it was the byzantine conquest of the west, and violent imposition of christianity that prevented the west’s restoration.
Yes, islam destroyed all the mediterranean trade routes which vastly reduced trade. But Islam could not cross the sahara well, could not displace hinduism in india, the chinese would have none of it as they still will not, and by the time the muslims made it into europe by the eastern route they had so exhausted the capital of all the great civilizations and reduced them to dysgenia and ignorance that they could not adapt to and compete with modernity.
The abrahamic dark ages destroyed every one of the great civilizations – all of them. We were just lucky in europe to SURVIVE THEM thanks to the north’s revolt against the corruption and nepotism of the church, and a reserve of northern peoples late to forcible conversion.
We are currently in the second abrahamic dark age, and the second counter-reveolution against western civilization: Rousseau > Kant > Marx/Freud/Boas/Cantor/Adorno > the french postmodernists and feminists. This abrahamic dark age is just using pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and outright denialism to accomplish in the modern world (manufacturing of ignorance, spreading a cult of economic and political promise, forcing immigration and displacement) that were practiced in the ancient world using sophomoric supernaturalism.
(
I answered colonialism in another post:
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156694322992264
)
I don’t expect other peoples to thank us for dragging them kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, and the vicissitudes of nature, but then I don’t expect them to lie to me and cast our forcible lifting of them from semi animal state in to modernity – whether I in the greco-roman world or this anglo-germanic one.
We had, at least until Burke, hoped the rest of mankind was able to join the aristocracy but they have not. And the 20th century was an interesting but failed experiment. This is why authoritarian governments are returning now that the USA as the inheritor of the british empire can no longer pay them for their conformity to the anglo empire.
We return to nation states, nationalism, national socialism, and managerial government. The rest of the people of the world are insufficiently developed to operate by rule of law of reciprocity (natural law). They need their falsehoods.
Just as you need yours.
Cheers.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 19:47:00 UTC
October 9th, 2018 7:47 PM NO, THE ABRAHAMIC DARK AGES ARE SOMETHING WE SURVIVED. [I] don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to not make the mistakes others have made, no matter how frequent. No, the abrahamic dark ages destroyed all the great civilizations of the ancient world. Yes, it was the combination of plague and raids that weakened the roman empire. Yes it was the byzantine conquest of the west, and violent imposition of christianity that prevented the west’s restoration. Yes, islam destroyed all the mediterranean trade routes which vastly reduced trade. But Islam could not cross the sahara well, could not displace hinduism in india, the chinese would have none of it as they still will not, and by the time the muslims made it into europe by the eastern route they had so exhausted the capital of all the great civilizations and reduced them to dysgenia and ignorance that they could not adapt to and compete with modernity. The abrahamic dark ages destroyed every one of the great civilizations – all of them. We were just lucky in europe to SURVIVE THEM thanks to the north’s revolt against the corruption and nepotism of the church, and a reserve of northern peoples late to forcible conversion. We are currently in the second abrahamic dark age, and the second counter-reveolution against western civilization: Rousseau > Kant > Marx/Freud/Boas/Cantor/Adorno > the french postmodernists and feminists. This abrahamic dark age is just using pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and outright denialism to accomplish in the modern world (manufacturing of ignorance, spreading a cult of economic and political promise, forcing immigration and displacement) that were practiced in the ancient world using sophomoric supernaturalism. ( I answered colonialism in another post: www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156694322992264 ) I don’t expect other peoples to thank us for dragging them kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, and the vicissitudes of nature, but then I don’t expect them to lie to me and cast our forcible lifting of them from semi animal state in to modernity – whether I in the greco-roman world or this anglo-germanic one. We had, at least until Burke, hoped the rest of mankind was able to join the aristocracy but they have not. And the 20th century was an interesting but failed experiment. This is why authoritarian governments are returning now that the USA as the inheritor of the british empire can no longer pay them for their conformity to the anglo empire. We return to nation states, nationalism, national socialism, and managerial government. The rest of the people of the world are insufficiently developed to operate by rule of law of reciprocity (natural law). They need their falsehoods. Just as you need yours. Cheers.
October 9th, 2018 7:47 PM NO, THE ABRAHAMIC DARK AGES ARE SOMETHING WE SURVIVED. [I] don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to not make the mistakes others have made, no matter how frequent. No, the abrahamic dark ages destroyed all the great civilizations of the ancient world. Yes, it was the combination of plague and raids that weakened the roman empire. Yes it was the byzantine conquest of the west, and violent imposition of christianity that prevented the west’s restoration. Yes, islam destroyed all the mediterranean trade routes which vastly reduced trade. But Islam could not cross the sahara well, could not displace hinduism in india, the chinese would have none of it as they still will not, and by the time the muslims made it into europe by the eastern route they had so exhausted the capital of all the great civilizations and reduced them to dysgenia and ignorance that they could not adapt to and compete with modernity. The abrahamic dark ages destroyed every one of the great civilizations – all of them. We were just lucky in europe to SURVIVE THEM thanks to the north’s revolt against the corruption and nepotism of the church, and a reserve of northern peoples late to forcible conversion. We are currently in the second abrahamic dark age, and the second counter-reveolution against western civilization: Rousseau > Kant > Marx/Freud/Boas/Cantor/Adorno > the french postmodernists and feminists. This abrahamic dark age is just using pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and outright denialism to accomplish in the modern world (manufacturing of ignorance, spreading a cult of economic and political promise, forcing immigration and displacement) that were practiced in the ancient world using sophomoric supernaturalism. ( I answered colonialism in another post: www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156694322992264 ) I don’t expect other peoples to thank us for dragging them kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, and the vicissitudes of nature, but then I don’t expect them to lie to me and cast our forcible lifting of them from semi animal state in to modernity – whether I in the greco-roman world or this anglo-germanic one. We had, at least until Burke, hoped the rest of mankind was able to join the aristocracy but they have not. And the 20th century was an interesting but failed experiment. This is why authoritarian governments are returning now that the USA as the inheritor of the british empire can no longer pay them for their conformity to the anglo empire. We return to nation states, nationalism, national socialism, and managerial government. The rest of the people of the world are insufficiently developed to operate by rule of law of reciprocity (natural law). They need their falsehoods. Just as you need yours. Cheers.
UM. SHROUD OF TURIN IS A NICE FORGERY. SORRY
As far as I know the Shroud of Turin was produced for profit (a forgery) after the Fourth Crusade, as was common for all religious artifacts of the era. (Every little church wanted one as it provided an excuse for pilgrimage (vacationers). It is produced on fabric from the crusade period. The pattern of the weave was not produced in the origin period (not even sure it COULD be produced), which usually consisted of simple two-way weave. It appears likely that the cloth was of medieval Indian origins. The blood artifacts on the shroud are neatly applied not fitting splatter or settlement patterns. The posture appears to have been of a sculpted figure, not natural. The sculpture itself is medieval in technique (a knight) not ancient (a soldier or nobility). The coloring itself and its iron oxide can be produced relatively easily by wetting with organic compounds and laying on a relief sculpture and placing it in the sunshine to dry (uv radiation), thereby oxidizing (‘rusting’) the organic compounds. In other words all that was necessary was to find a relief sculpture common on a crusader burial of the period, to wet it with any number of organic materials (speculation on which was used isn’t clear), rub those organic compounds while on the sculpture, and to dry it in the intense regional sunshine. The problem we face is that so many people have come in contact with it, that other than the oxidation (Stains), we can’t trust any of the micro particles we’ve pulled from it since they contain everything from europe to the levant. In any event, as someone with a lot of experience with dead bodies, who has done rubbings of ancient 3d arts from all over the world, it looks like an obvious forgery, and it’s pretty hard for me to imagine anyone would think otherwise. But then I have an education in ancient art history, in identifying are methods, and as a consequence, art fraud, and my family is in the ‘burial’ business so maybe I’m just more informed by accident of circumstance.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 14:08:00 UTC
The only historic facts we know are that (a) someone seems to have existed, (b) the fact that temples functioned as banks necessary for trade, and the uprising at the temple, (c)the prosecution and crucifixion of this person.
Every other aspect appears to have been produced by the fictionalization and incorporation of other myths, that like all of judaism, began either in mesopotamia, persia, egypt, or greece.
We can document and have the evolution of each of the myths, from the first evidence in anatolia, to the spread throughout the fertile crescent.
—
The fact that most muslim scholars support the story of mohammed against all historical evidence. The fact that most christian scholars support the story of jesus against the historical evidence. And the fact that most jewish scholars support the existence of each of the characters and events, despite the evidence, tells us nothing. Truth is not determined by democracy, or by opinion, nor by historical authorship, but by evidence that survives falsification of all of the above.
Someone named jesus seems to have lived. However, the only evidence we have that does not have origin in other myths and religions, is (a) uprising at the temple, (b) prosecution, (c) crucifiction.
EVERYTHING ELSE was intentionally imported from prior religions synthesizing Seneca the Younger’s Stoicism, Greek Neo Platonism (idealism)/Authoritarianism, and Jewish pro roman reformation authors.
The origin of the ‘risen after three days’ is most interesting because it actually refers to the morning star which, in the jewish tradition, was not just Horace but Lucifer.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 09:45:00 UTC
October 9th, 2018 2:08 PM UM. SHROUD OF TURIN IS A NICE FORGERY. SORRY [A]s far as I know the Shroud of Turin was produced for profit (a forgery) after the Fourth Crusade, as was common for all religious artifacts of the era. (Every little church wanted one as it provided an excuse for pilgrimage (vacationers). It is produced on fabric from the crusade period. The pattern of the weave was not produced in the origin period (not even sure it COULD be produced), which usually consisted of simple two-way weave. It appears likely that the cloth was of medieval Indian origins. The blood artifacts on the shroud are neatly applied not fitting splatter or settlement patterns. The posture appears to have been of a sculpted figure, not natural. The sculpture itself is medieval in technique (a knight) not ancient (a soldier or nobility). The coloring itself and its iron oxide can be produced relatively easily by wetting with organic compounds and laying on a relief sculpture and placing it in the sunshine to dry (uv radiation), thereby oxidizing (‘rusting’) the organic compounds. In other words all that was necessary was to find a relief sculpture common on a crusader burial of the period, to wet it with any number of organic materials (speculation on which was used isn’t clear), rub those organic compounds while on the sculpture, and to dry it in the intense regional sunshine. The problem we face is that so many people have come in contact with it, that other than the oxidation (Stains), we can’t trust any of the micro particles we’ve pulled from it since they contain everything from europe to the levant. In any event, as someone with a lot of experience with dead bodies, who has done rubbings of ancient 3d arts from all over the world, it looks like an obvious forgery, and it’s pretty hard for me to imagine anyone would think otherwise. But then I have an education in ancient art history, in identifying are methods, and as a consequence, art fraud, and my family is in the ‘burial’ business so maybe I’m just more informed by accident of circumstance.
October 9th, 2018 2:08 PM UM. SHROUD OF TURIN IS A NICE FORGERY. SORRY [A]s far as I know the Shroud of Turin was produced for profit (a forgery) after the Fourth Crusade, as was common for all religious artifacts of the era. (Every little church wanted one as it provided an excuse for pilgrimage (vacationers). It is produced on fabric from the crusade period. The pattern of the weave was not produced in the origin period (not even sure it COULD be produced), which usually consisted of simple two-way weave. It appears likely that the cloth was of medieval Indian origins. The blood artifacts on the shroud are neatly applied not fitting splatter or settlement patterns. The posture appears to have been of a sculpted figure, not natural. The sculpture itself is medieval in technique (a knight) not ancient (a soldier or nobility). The coloring itself and its iron oxide can be produced relatively easily by wetting with organic compounds and laying on a relief sculpture and placing it in the sunshine to dry (uv radiation), thereby oxidizing (‘rusting’) the organic compounds. In other words all that was necessary was to find a relief sculpture common on a crusader burial of the period, to wet it with any number of organic materials (speculation on which was used isn’t clear), rub those organic compounds while on the sculpture, and to dry it in the intense regional sunshine. The problem we face is that so many people have come in contact with it, that other than the oxidation (Stains), we can’t trust any of the micro particles we’ve pulled from it since they contain everything from europe to the levant. In any event, as someone with a lot of experience with dead bodies, who has done rubbings of ancient 3d arts from all over the world, it looks like an obvious forgery, and it’s pretty hard for me to imagine anyone would think otherwise. But then I have an education in ancient art history, in identifying are methods, and as a consequence, art fraud, and my family is in the ‘burial’ business so maybe I’m just more informed by accident of circumstance.
WE KNOW QUITE WELL WHAT POSTMODERNISM, COMMUNISM, AND ABRAHAMISM “ARE” (“Consist Of”):
In response to a criticism of Hicks’ Postmodernism:
—“When you don’t know what communism or… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=301842593745971&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-08 14:08:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049300439479595008
There is only one Prophet, and his Name Is Aristotle.
😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-06 14:39:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048583550386278401