Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • “This means you recognise the value of these practices mentioned? (Preaching/pra

    —“This means you recognise the value of these practices mentioned? (Preaching/prayer/feasting). What have, or what would/should the people found/find shelter in if not ch*rches?”— Benjamin Baker

    I recognize:

    1 – The value of Teaching and Repeating in group forum to restate the terms of our contract with one another for reciprocity within the limits of proportionality.

    2 – The use of Verbal Repetition (self programming) to satisfy our physical neuroticism – particularly when under stress, and

    3 – The use of Celebrating together to eliminate our differences, therefore reducing social stresses of animals extremely conscious of their status in the pack (male) or herd (female)

    That’s because I recognize that people need mindfulness. I recognize that abrahamic religion is the worst possible means of achieving it.

    The fact that people ‘need or find shelter’ in a religion is evidence that it is evil. Cognitive behavioral therapy can not only prevent that need, but cure it.

    The church closed the stoic schools in order to make people dependent, where the stoic schools made people eindependent.

    The church wants addicts like drug dealers want addicts and for the same reason.

    Our people want MINDFULNESS so that they do not need to be SEDATED and be ADDICTS to lies or drugs, or alcohol, or sex, or whatever else they need to sedate themselves in the absence of mindfulness.

    My problem is coming up with a 12 step program of sorts to help addicts of semitic deceit to become fully human again.

    This is my interpretation of Peterson’s work: he’s half restoring stoicism through self help rather than creating the program of education such that self help is not necessary.

    It is no longer possible to convince educated people with experience in the world of the supernatural. We are no longer dumb and ignorant enough. I’m proposing the ‘scientific’ way of achieving the same ends.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-16 09:15:00 UTC

  • “I agree, but this is a problem with Christianity: none of you agree on what the

    —“I agree, but this is a problem with Christianity: none of you agree on what the religion is. That is why there are over 30,000 sects within it.”—Eric Grose

    What is christianity? Given there are ‘30,000 sects’?

    Christianity = gathering for lesson(Preaching), oath(prayer), and feast(communion) under interpretation of the semi-fictional characters in the bible, and the trial of jesus.

    Christianity was designed for conquest: A complete inversion of the interpretation of the semi fictional characters of the iliad and the trial of achilles, combined with the persian and roman army (aryan) sun god.

    Christianity is the Anti-Aristocratic cult of maternalism the purpose of which was to destroy the aristocratic cult of paternalism.

    Hence why judaism is spread by insurrection against a host, christianity is spread by force, bribery and deceit, and islam spread by force, rule, taxation, forcible indoctrination, and deceit.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-16 07:30:00 UTC

  • Martin Štěpán That’s the answer. Thank you. 😉 And that also tells me how to ref

    Martin Štěpán
    That’s the answer. Thank you. 😉
    And that also tells me how to reform religion gradually.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-16 00:21:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096565094132133888

  • The devoted turn into evangelicals. The old die off, and the young opt out. And

    The devoted turn into evangelicals. The old die off, and the young opt out. And the main body of the population only gives christianity a ‘nod’.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 22:36:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096538660248313856

  • “My homeschooled 9yo daughter was taught already most of the mythologies, greek,

    —“My homeschooled 9yo daughter was taught already most of the mythologies, greek, roman, egyptian and christian. She’s currently studying japanese mythology and I plan to teach her babylonian, celtic and many others as her interests go towards them. To her, they hold pretty much the same significance – as ancient philosophies at a time of the infancy of our species where we hardly had a clue about what was going on.”—JWarren Prescott


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 19:23:00 UTC

  • Martin Štěpán That’s the answer. Thank you. 😉 And that also tells me how to ref

    Martin Štěpán

    That’s the answer. Thank you. 😉

    And that also tells me how to reform religion gradually.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 19:20:00 UTC

  • THE STATE OF RELIGION IN AMERICA (2014) The Christian share of the population is

    THE STATE OF RELIGION IN AMERICA (2014)

    The Christian share of the population is declining and the religiously unaffiliated share is growing in all four major geographic regions of the country. Religious “nones” now constitute 19% of the adult population in the South (up from 13% in 2007), 22% of the population in the Midwest (up from 16%), 25% of the population in the Northeast (up from 16%) and 28% of the population in the West (up from 21%). In the West, the religiously unaffiliated are more numerous than Catholics (23%), evangelicals (22%) and every other religious group.

    Whites continue to be more likely than both blacks and Hispanics to identify as religiously unaffiliated; 24% of whites say they have no religion, compared with 20% of Hispanics and 18% of blacks. But the religiously unaffiliated have grown (and Christians have declined) as a share of the population within all three of these racial and ethnic groups.

    The percentage of college graduates who identify with Christianity has declined by nine percentage points since 2007 (from 73% to 64%). The Christian share of the population has declined by a similar amount among those with less than a college education (from 81% to 73%). Religious “nones” now constitute 24% of all college graduates (up from 17%) and 22% of those with less than a college degree (up from 16%).

    More than a quarter of men (27%) now describe themselves as religiously unaffiliated, up from 20% in 2007. Fewer women are religious “nones,” but the religiously unaffiliated are growing among women at about the same rate as among men. Nearly one-in-five women (19%) now describe themselves as religiously unaffiliated, up from 13% in 2007.

    Although it is low relative to other religious groups, the retention rate of the unaffiliated has increased. In the current survey, 53% of those raised as religiously unaffiliated still identify as “nones” in adulthood, up seven points since 2007. And among Millennials, “nones” actually have one of the highest retention rates of all the religious categories that are large enough to analyze in the survey.

    As the ranks of the religiously unaffiliated continue to grow, they also describe themselves in increasingly secular terms. In 2007, 25% of the “nones” called themselves atheists or agnostics; 39% identified their religion as “nothing in particular” and also said that religion is “not too” or “not at all” important in their lives; and 36% identified their religion as “nothing in particular” while nevertheless saying that religion is either “very important” or “somewhat important” in their lives. The new survey finds that the atheist and agnostic share of the “nones” has grown to 31%. Those identifying as “nothing in particular” and describing religion as unimportant in their lives continue to account for 39% of all “nones.” But the share identifying as “nothing in particular” while also affirming that religion is either “very” or “somewhat” important to them has fallen to 30% of all “nones.”

    While the mainline Protestant share of the population is significantly smaller today than it was in 2007, the evangelical Protestant share of the population has remained comparatively stable (ticking downward slightly from 26.3% to 25.4% of the population). As a result, evangelicals now constitute a clear majority (55%) of all U.S. Protestants. In 2007, roughly half of Protestants (51%) identified with evangelical churches.

    Since 2007, the share of evangelical Protestants who identify with Baptist denominations has shrunk from 41% to 36%. Meanwhile, the share of evangelicals identifying with nondenominational churches has grown from 13% to 19%.

    The United Methodist Church (UMC) continues to be the largest denomination within the mainline Protestant tradition. Currently, 25% of mainline Protestants identify with the UMC, down slightly from 28% in 2007.

    More than six-in-ten people in the historically black Protestant tradition identify with Baptist denominations, including 22% who identify with the National Baptist Convention, the largest denomination within the historically black Protestant tradition.

    The share of the public identifying with religions other than Christianity has grown from 4.7% in 2007 to 5.9% in 2014. Gains were most pronounced among Muslims (who accounted for 0.4% of respondents in the 2007 Religious Landscape Study and 0.9% in 2014) and Hindus (0.4% in 2007 vs. 0.7% in 2014).12

    Roughly one-in-seven participants in the new survey (15%) were born outside the U.S., and two-thirds of those immigrants are Christians, including 39% who are Catholic. More than one-in-ten immigrants identify with a non-Christian faith, such as Islam or Hinduism.

    Hindus and Jews continue to be the most highly educated religious traditions. Fully 77% of Hindus are college graduates, as are 59% of Jews (compared with 27% of all U.S. adults). These groups also have above-average household incomes. Fully 44% of Jews and 36% of Hindus say their annual family income exceeds $100,000, compared with 19% of the public overall.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 17:33:00 UTC

  • 1) No, because when surveyed christianity comes out low on the list compared to

    1) No, because when surveyed christianity comes out low on the list compared to the more important issues that are more material, particularly because only a minority of attendees actually ‘believe’ (they’re mostly deists) 2) John was immediately successful and moved up time.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 17:04:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096455103484186624

    Reply addressees: @DataDistribute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096454375436742657


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096454375436742657

  • No. Hence why I am struggling to find a way to “Tolerate” abrahamic lying and se

    No. Hence why I am struggling to find a way to “Tolerate” abrahamic lying and secure our people at the same time. I just haven’t found it yet. However, that said, I am fairly certain that “red state” fight on economic and political benefits alone, natural forces will do the rest.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 16:59:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096453836967997441

    Reply addressees: @DataDistribute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096451439734341632


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096451439734341632

  • “Teaching the [christian] myths as factual would be [illegal]. But teaching the

    —“Teaching the [christian] myths as factual would be [illegal]. But teaching the myths as myths[lessons] and conveying truthful values through them is good. And Christianity does contain [critically important] truthful values.”—Martin Štěpán


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 16:47:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096450850594054145