Religion is just sh-tty law, worse litterature, and bad education.
Heathenism is just thanking one another, our ancestors, and nature for bringing us into being.
Debts. It’s just debts.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 05:15:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100263072319619072
We survived christianity.
Some of our are still infected.
But there is hope.
With stoicism we can cure you.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 01:08:00 UTC
Religion is just sh-tty law, worse litterature, and bad education.
Heathenism is just thanking one another, our ancestors, and nature for bringing us into being.
Debts. It’s just debts.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 00:15:00 UTC
LACK OF CONVICTION AND SIGNIFICANCE
There are strong christians and weak christians; good christians and bad christians; honest christians, and dishonest christians; committed christians and convenient christians.
We represent: the truth, a constitutional reformation, and insurrection to demand it, is terrifying to bad christians.
Why it confronts their insignificance and lack of conviction to do what is required to be significant.
If you won’t fight you are insignificant. You have no conviction only cowardice.
The truth is enough, but you can’t bear it. You can’t bear it because you can’t bear the shallowness of your conviction and the absence of your significance.
The compromise is Truth in Faith and Truth in Law, or defeat of faith.
The compromise is a christian nation or a christian minority.
The compromise is a rule of law monarchy or no strongman.
The compromise is a rule of law nationalism, or predatory socialism.
The compromise is a rule of law market for classes, or pretense of democracy.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 00:11:00 UTC
Now, you just cherry picked a few thinkers each of whom was his generation’s first convert to aristotelianism. Spinoza was kicked out once he read european thought. Mendelssohn was trying to modernize in REACTION to western thought’s progress, and Von Neumann and Einstein were part of the first few generations of jews tolerated in europe – both having integrated into aristotelian thought and all but converted to christianity.
The reintroduction of greek thought into europe was produced by a series of waves from the crusades, the transition of islam to ‘closure’, and the retaking of spain.
Jews were the most literate people in europe for almost a thousand years and what did they accomplish other than setting the record for being purged for crimes against the people? Any literature? Any art? Any science? Any technology? Any medicine? Any legal system? Any Country? Any polity other than the pale for which they were justly punished by the locals?
So you engaged in precisely the form of lying that christianity and judaism and islam teach, and which I expose and fight against.
And so, why didn’t you mention Marx, Boaz, Freud, Lenin, Stalin, Adorno, Derrida, the ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center, The Hollywood Leftist machine, The NYT et al,, the finance industry and the pornography industry?
Why didn’t you mention the 100M dead because of marx, the jewish bolsheviks, and the crisis of fascism in order to stop them? The pseudoscience of boaz and freud that destroyed our soft sciences. The utter fabrications of adorno and the frankfurt school? The warfare against our people by adorno and derrida, selling lies and destruction to the first mass generations of women in the academy?
The total suppression of western thought from ww2 forward?
NO MORE LIES. NO MORE PILPUL. NO MORE CRITIQUE.
The enemy is among us and the Christian gives that system of lies constant nurturing and support.
NO MORE LIES.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 23:10:00 UTC
THE RETURNS ON INTOLERANCE
End Christian Tolerance as cheap Virtue Signaling. Restore The VIrtue of Intolerance – and the high cost of intolerance. The returns on tolerance are suicidal. The returns on intolerance eternal.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 15:07:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099687211270897665
NAILING THE CHRISTIAN QUESTION
—Curt Doolittle you nailed the Christian question for me. I try to imitate Christ as best I can, and believe it as “true”…in the sense of a way to live, an archetypal truth and not necessarily the literal kind. It doesn’t matter to me whether it all literally happened, I have no way of knowing that.”—Zach Matto
Which is the optimum interpretation.
It is hard to be a better ‘average person’ than by imitating ‘christ’. I suspect there is none better.
You will be a better person doing so than any other character you might imitate. Because it is the optimum prisoner’s dilemma strategy for every single human as well as for any human group. That’s just science.
But if it must be ‘true under law’ instead of an archetypal optimum (perfection really) then we cannot end the people who destroy our people.
I sort of look at it this way: demandit it to be true is demanding others to do for you what you want.
Demanding it to be the optimum means of conducting your own life is demanding you do for others.
This is my understanding of Christianity:
0) the life of piety: all life is sacred until proven otherwise.
1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.
2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.
3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
My ‘ask’ is to limit this charity to ingroups in order to prevent virtue signaling by failing to take care of those neighbors you look down upon.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 13:47:00 UTC
AFAIK book Q is lost. This draft produced an oral tradition. The oral traditions spread and was modified and added to.
The ability to rally the underclasses by it to violence against the romans and greeks spread revolutionary insurrection and resistance just like did Marxism in the present world using the same false promises.
This new religion provided a revolutionary vehicle, and people piled onto it in revolt.
Judaism > Revolt against the agrarian and metalsmithing peoples (fertile crescent empires).
Christianity > Revolt against greeks and romans. By undermining the minority aristocracy of the west.
Islam > revolt against ALL aristocratic civilizations – justifying destruction, conquest, and stealing everything not nailed down.
Marxism > Libertarianism > Postmodernism > Feminism > Neoconservatism > Islamism : Revolt against ALL the great civilizations – in a desperate attempt to restore underclass rule.
One continuous dysgenic, decivilizing, revolt against the indo europeans and their expansion, and their conversion from feminine underclass to masculine aristocratic rule.
The war will continue until we name the war for what it is, and end it one way or another.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 12:26:00 UTC
THE RETURNS ON INTOLERANCE
End Christian Tolerance as cheap Virtue Signaling. Restore The VIrtue of Intolerance – and the high cost of intolerance. The returns on tolerance are suicidal. The returns on intolerance eternal.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 10:07:00 UTC
NICEA
They consolidated power in the most SEPARATIST religion they could control. They had ‘control’ over the jesus character, but not control over the god character. So they chose the most useful storyline: the one with no competitors, and such that they could ‘parasite’ upon existing ‘god’.
ie: Jesus is a parasitic character on the narrative history of gods, taking his legitimacy from a god, but unbound by the previous (really horrible semitic) god.
They couldn’t make him a god, but wanted him to have the power of a god. So they made a parasitic character dependent upon these gods.
This provided the priests with the control they needed to displace not only the previous religions, but through mass militant adoption, the aristocratic peoples (military and law) with a priesthood.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 21:39:00 UTC