Curt Doolittle

Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550420564 Timestamp) CHRISTIANS ARE NATURAL LEFTISTS Christians were always the ally of the left – there reason for the war against the south, the reason for immigration, the reason for ‘civil rights’. The christians only moved to the ‘right’ once they understood that the state wanted to become the new religion in the franco-jewish-soviet model. Christianity is not nationalist, is not particularist, is not masculine, is not heroic, is not militaristic, expansionary, truthful, sovereign. It’s antithetical to the west: a purely semitic cult. It was the church’s necessity of accommodating the aristocracy that made our people survive christianity and made the claims of something other than destruction of our people possible. They are not members of the libertarian or right. Instead, libertarians and the right give ‘nod’ to christians the way men give ‘nod’ to women, and value christianity the way men value women. But Christians are not ‘men’ , nor ‘european’ but simply semitic (female strategy) of resistance, undermining, and dysgenia.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550419699 Timestamp) CAN OUR PEOPLE SURVIVE WHILE ACCOMMODATING CHRISTIANITY? (NO) by Daniel Gurpide Is it possible to accommodate Christianity once the veil of ignorance has been torn asunder? Is it possible to teach the five core tenets which constitute the ‘optimum group strategy’, discard the rest of the claptrap, and still call that Christianity? Theoretically, yes; in practice, it is as easy as to reinsert a Champagne cork back into the bottle. Nowhere are the effects caused by the pursuit of the tenets of Jewish-Christian egalitarianism more existentially dramatic—because it threatens the very survival of the communities concerned—than in the demographic suicide now being committed by the West. The West faces massive Third World immigration, and high fertility rates combined with below-replacement white birth rates. As Lothrop Stoddard feared, a rising tide of colour is swamping the West; and it is guilt about the Third World which is the primary cause of mass immigration into Western lands. Comparison with Japan repays attention, for this Far Eastern country experiences the same economic conditioning as Europe or the United States, but has managed to control migratory fluxes remarkably well. Christianity is a derivative, a heresy, from Judaism, but it teaches Europe precisely the opposite lesson as far as ethnocentrism is concerned. In Christianity, European peoples cannot—as a people—have a relation with God: this is for the Jewish people alone. European people can have a relation with God only as individuals. Judaism is a religion for survival in a multicultural society. It is a religion for governing the behaviour of a Jewish minority in the presence of a non-Jewish majority. Christianity, on the other hand, is a religion for governing the behaviour of Christians in a homogeneous Christian society. In a multicultural society it becomes suicidal. The original meaning of the Latin word religio—from religare, to tie fast—was never used until Constantinian times to describe the ‘superstitio nova ac malefica’ represented by Christianity and has nothing to do with the metaphysical or fideistic concepts introduced by monotheism. It is simply what binds together the members of a political and ethno-cultural community. As such, religion has two aspects: the myth—the representation that we choose to have of our own past, and more generally of the universe, in relation to the future, the destiny that we want to create; and the rite—the evocation and celebration of our being together with the intention of provoking a general mobilisation of spirits. Historical consciousness is also part of human agency. It is time to choose!

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550463973 Timestamp) WHICH KIND OF CHRISTIAN ARE YOU So the question is: 1 – Are you a scientific christian (science) 2 – Are you a normative christian (habit) 3 – Are you a philosophical christian (choice) 4 – Are you a supernatural christian (faith). I am a scientific christian.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550437292 Timestamp) TALKING TO THE GODS THAT EXIST I talk to my god every day. Fairly often. The difference is that i have a scientific understanding of this god as a sort of low level ‘software’ I consult, and response as intuition or feeling rather than high level software like speech. This knowledge poses no problem for me. It is simply true. And it works. We all share similar versions of this software in every faith that depends upon fictional characters. This software does its job. For some reason the fact that this software is in our physical brains rather than in some imaginary alternate plane or universe seems to be difficult for others. And they would rather believe in magic men with superpowers, than a bit of low level software that we all run at all times and consciously and unconsciously update with new tweaks from one another. I mean… this is how gods, heroes, the dead, actually exist – as information. And once you understand that the universe consist entirely of what we have no better word for than ‘information’, this makes a lot more sense. Over time my ‘god’ has ‘revealed himself’ (meaning transformed into) something between An ancient oak grove, the bodies of my ancestors, Odin, Aristotle, and Aurelius. Because it shares those … similarities. He is a god of my experience and making. And he rarely if ever fails me. So I talk to him all the time whenever I think “what should I do?” about anything meaningful. Then I write down what I think after that and I’m done. Because writing words – making them real – tames the intuition (subconsious).

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550463793 Timestamp) Deus Vult!!!!! Veritas Et Violentias!!!

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550433323 Timestamp) RELEVANCE OF ALL OUR RELIGIOUS TEACHINGS AND TRADITIONS —“Curt Doolittle , I would submit to you this fact, even if many Christians are nominal and not walking out all the prescribed teachings of their faith, the teachings are still sound and available for reference in order to keep some semblance of functionality for the greater society as a whole..”— Bab Sorgente Um. I would say that they (christians) would rather we institutionalize christianity in the constitution as the practice of the five rules of christianity, the natural law of reciprocity, and that no other religions counter to such may be tolerated, would give them sufficient license to show that their religion is in fact ‘True’ when taught as a mythology of wisdom literature, and only ‘false’ if they teach it as history. (because that is what most smart folk in the world think.) I am a christian in that it means property rights (ten commandments), the sacred (limits to my rights of expression action and thought), natural law (reciprocity), and jesus teaching (exhaustion of all possible opportunity for forgiveness for ingroup members). THIS IS THE STRATEGY BEHIND CHRISTIANITY. But the magic man nonsense for illiterates and morons so that they believe an omniscient and omnipotent yet never evident someone worth worshipping as a slavemaster loves them despite their low status low agency and low ability – is just that and nothing but fairy stories for slaves to tolerate their enslavement until death. So we are really in a question whether we continue the evolution of our religions of heathen, aryan, greco-roman, christian, philosophical and scientific into something we all can COMPROMISE UPON, or we can keep those individual religions and agree only on the scientific substance behind all our natural religions – the ~22 Laws.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550447044 Timestamp) How would you reform our religion so that those for whom acts of faith are simply acts of stupidity or lying could persist in our religion? I know a way that requires no reform.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550437292 Timestamp) TALKING TO THE GODS THAT EXIST I talk to my god every day. Fairly often. The difference is that i have a scientific understanding of this god as a sort of low level ‘software’ I consult, and response as intuition or feeling rather than high level software like speech. This knowledge poses no problem for me. It is simply true. And it works. We all share similar versions of this software in every faith that depends upon fictional characters. This software does its job. For some reason the fact that this software is in our physical brains rather than in some imaginary alternate plane or universe seems to be difficult for others. And they would rather believe in magic men with superpowers, than a bit of low level software that we all run at all times and consciously and unconsciously update with new tweaks from one another. I mean… this is how gods, heroes, the dead, actually exist – as information. And once you understand that the universe consist entirely of what we have no better word for than ‘information’, this makes a lot more sense. Over time my ‘god’ has ‘revealed himself’ (meaning transformed into) something between An ancient oak grove, the bodies of my ancestors, Odin, Aristotle, and Aurelius. Because it shares those … similarities. He is a god of my experience and making. And he rarely if ever fails me. So I talk to him all the time whenever I think “what should I do?” about anything meaningful. Then I write down what I think after that and I’m done. Because writing words – making them real – tames the intuition (subconsious).

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550433323 Timestamp) RELEVANCE OF ALL OUR RELIGIOUS TEACHINGS AND TRADITIONS —“Curt Doolittle , I would submit to you this fact, even if many Christians are nominal and not walking out all the prescribed teachings of their faith, the teachings are still sound and available for reference in order to keep some semblance of functionality for the greater society as a whole..”— Bab Sorgente Um. I would say that they (christians) would rather we institutionalize christianity in the constitution as the practice of the five rules of christianity, the natural law of reciprocity, and that no other religions counter to such may be tolerated, would give them sufficient license to show that their religion is in fact ‘True’ when taught as a mythology of wisdom literature, and only ‘false’ if they teach it as history. (because that is what most smart folk in the world think.) I am a christian in that it means property rights (ten commandments), the sacred (limits to my rights of expression action and thought), natural law (reciprocity), and jesus teaching (exhaustion of all possible opportunity for forgiveness for ingroup members). THIS IS THE STRATEGY BEHIND CHRISTIANITY. But the magic man nonsense for illiterates and morons so that they believe an omniscient and omnipotent yet never evident someone worth worshipping as a slavemaster loves them despite their low status low agency and low ability – is just that and nothing but fairy stories for slaves to tolerate their enslavement until death. So we are really in a question whether we continue the evolution of our religions of heathen, aryan, greco-roman, christian, philosophical and scientific into something we all can COMPROMISE UPON, or we can keep those individual religions and agree only on the scientific substance behind all our natural religions – the ~22 Laws.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550463973 Timestamp) WHICH KIND OF CHRISTIAN ARE YOU So the question is: 1 – Are you a scientific christian (science) 2 – Are you a normative christian (habit) 3 – Are you a philosophical christian (choice) 4 – Are you a supernatural christian (faith). I am a scientific christian.