(FB 1549161419 Timestamp) It is extremely hard to concoct a myth, parable, or fairy tale. Try it. You will inevitably leave behind forensic evidence. So this is one of the means by which we identify those who write history from oral tradition, those who write myth and legend and those who write it as fictions whole cloth. It is terribly easy to detect historical fabrication by forensic investigation of the narrative composition and the history of each fragment.
Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549159308 Timestamp) —“calculating 40 years/generation would set a birth date for Odin to be around 100 – 150 AD.”— (Color me skeptical.) —“These indications adequately supports Snorris story of the Asas fleeing for the Roman forces to seek new land up in northern Europe – in Svitjod. But most importantly, the existence of a people called Asas living by the Black Sea around 100 BC – 100 AD can now be confirmed. It seems plausible that the Asas really could have emigrated from Azov/AsgÃ¥rd around 60 BC, and that a human named Odin could have existed in Scandinavia or northern Germany around 50 BC. But it certainly does not match the Anglo-Saxon genealogy, as we have seen. So, to answer the question whether this adds up to support the Asa-peoples emigration from the Black Sea is rather easy: The simple truth is, it does not… Thus it seems we have two different approaches for identification of a human being, named Odin, that span at least 200 years apart. It just do not match… How can this be solved?”—
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549159308 Timestamp) —“calculating 40 years/generation would set a birth date for Odin to be around 100 – 150 AD.”— (Color me skeptical.) —“These indications adequately supports Snorris story of the Asas fleeing for the Roman forces to seek new land up in northern Europe – in Svitjod. But most importantly, the existence of a people called Asas living by the Black Sea around 100 BC – 100 AD can now be confirmed. It seems plausible that the Asas really could have emigrated from Azov/AsgÃ¥rd around 60 BC, and that a human named Odin could have existed in Scandinavia or northern Germany around 50 BC. But it certainly does not match the Anglo-Saxon genealogy, as we have seen. So, to answer the question whether this adds up to support the Asa-peoples emigration from the Black Sea is rather easy: The simple truth is, it does not… Thus it seems we have two different approaches for identification of a human being, named Odin, that span at least 200 years apart. It just do not match… How can this be solved?”—
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549156319 Timestamp) Because Odin existed, and was a leader, teacher, and law giver.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549156319 Timestamp) Because Odin existed, and was a leader, teacher, and law giver.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549307787 Timestamp) —“Rewriting the Bible with Propertarian language in line with truth and the natural law of reciprocity would instantly create the religion that many keep demanding of you without any sacrifice in terms of what direction propertarianism would carry the country and by extension the world. The re-domestication of Christians would be a net positive for everyone.”— That is VERY FKING SMART. Never occurred to me. I think in terms of writing the law. A ‘law book’. But you know the influence such a bible would have would be … well…wow Completing jefferson’s project. I think you just solved my last problem. dammit. I hate it when the answer is in my face —“I know the religious problem is difficult because there is so much convoluted language involved. Itâs tough to sort out meaning but this could actually be to the advantage of Propertarianism. Now that your sights are on it youâll be able to sort it out even better than me because of your mastery in scientific language.”— I think… I think we could create a sort of wiki and do a paragraph by paragraph translation and combine the repetitive stories into one… hmmm…. yep. I’ve re-written two – cain and abel, and the garden of eden, but the whole book can be done? “In the beginning…” becomes an opportunity for comparative religion, and the opportunity to herald christianity…hmm… —“Exactly! Itâs really brilliant and I think it is precisely what is needed to âlift the vailâ from the eyes of the western world. Iâll see if I can make time this week to write up a sample to submit for your analysis.”— We write the Law (rome) rewrite Aristotle(greece), and Rewrite the Bible (byzantium) and … well, you know, that sort of unites Germania, Rome, Athens, Byzantium, jerusalem, Mesopotamia and Persia. hmm… even india. Even china…. Ugh.. Like I don’t have enough work to do…. sigh.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549307787 Timestamp) —“Rewriting the Bible with Propertarian language in line with truth and the natural law of reciprocity would instantly create the religion that many keep demanding of you without any sacrifice in terms of what direction propertarianism would carry the country and by extension the world. The re-domestication of Christians would be a net positive for everyone.”— That is VERY FKING SMART. Never occurred to me. I think in terms of writing the law. A ‘law book’. But you know the influence such a bible would have would be … well…wow Completing jefferson’s project. I think you just solved my last problem. dammit. I hate it when the answer is in my face —“I know the religious problem is difficult because there is so much convoluted language involved. Itâs tough to sort out meaning but this could actually be to the advantage of Propertarianism. Now that your sights are on it youâll be able to sort it out even better than me because of your mastery in scientific language.”— I think… I think we could create a sort of wiki and do a paragraph by paragraph translation and combine the repetitive stories into one… hmmm…. yep. I’ve re-written two – cain and abel, and the garden of eden, but the whole book can be done? “In the beginning…” becomes an opportunity for comparative religion, and the opportunity to herald christianity…hmm… —“Exactly! Itâs really brilliant and I think it is precisely what is needed to âlift the vailâ from the eyes of the western world. Iâll see if I can make time this week to write up a sample to submit for your analysis.”— We write the Law (rome) rewrite Aristotle(greece), and Rewrite the Bible (byzantium) and … well, you know, that sort of unites Germania, Rome, Athens, Byzantium, jerusalem, Mesopotamia and Persia. hmm… even india. Even china…. Ugh.. Like I don’t have enough work to do…. sigh.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549301389 Timestamp) BLAME THE MAN IN THE MIRROR – UNTIL WE ACT —The west is defeated by the same abrahamic deception in the modern world as in the ancient. So is it our fault for allowing it again? Or the fault of abrahamic peoples for exploiting our weakness? The man in the mirror is the man at fault.— The Natural Law – “The White Law” – will end the use of deceits against our people forever.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549301389 Timestamp) BLAME THE MAN IN THE MIRROR – UNTIL WE ACT —The west is defeated by the same abrahamic deception in the modern world as in the ancient. So is it our fault for allowing it again? Or the fault of abrahamic peoples for exploiting our weakness? The man in the mirror is the man at fault.— The Natural Law – “The White Law” – will end the use of deceits against our people forever.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1549299435 Timestamp) WHAT IS A GOOD GOD? (AND ONE THAT CAN EXIST) —“man is the only god, and only if he makes himself into one.”— Curt Doolittle —“Sir, help me to understand this, from your own experience and I understand that truth is objective, no lies anymore like you keep saying, how can one make himself into a god? Thank you. Please make it practical for me”—Kofi Kofi – I am sorry to confuse you. It is very simple really: we (mankind) are slowly making ourselves from beasts, into men, into ‘demi-gods’, and into ‘gods’. Not as individuals, but together as humanity. One day at a time one year at a time, we slowly painfully with very much suffering, create power over the plants and animals, over ourselves, over the earth, and over the forces of nature. Our gods our just our visions of ourselves. And we are making ourselves into the gods we imagine. SOme of us imaging good gods, and some of us a bad gods. But we all evolve into the gods we imagine. Love to you my brother. Let me know if I must say more. —“Thank you, you should explain to me what a god is. And what constitutes good or bad god”— What constitutes a good or bad man? What constitutes a man who is good from a man that can DO good? What constitutes people who think and feel they are good, from a people who do good? There is a difference from thinking you are good, being good, doing good, and making a nation of good people, doing good. (to be continued….