Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • An Agentist Approach to Divinity

    by Ferdinand Pizarro I lend a quasi-religious interpretation to information (order), but I tend to have a more agentist approach to my conception of “god” and/or divinity, which has the effect of providing sufficient interface for approximation of godliness. In other words, I don’t see information as god, but the net production of information (dissipation of entropy) as godliness. Thus those of us who can organize man & matter for the production of order (social, material, aesthetic) are “divine” so-to-speak. Tough subject. I always “feel” a sort of energy from within, a youthful spring, when I contemplate it, and I do so often. I found this in my notes from 2017, which you may clear up some of my hazy thinking by example:

    “The speakers of lies, subverters of truth, producers of confusion, the underminers of trust, the agents of chaos; the primordial enemies of human agency, excellence, beauty & the order that we, The Truthful Ones, impose on the Cosmos by incremental mastery over self, entropy & the human condition—the enemy for short.”

    This is essentially the only way I’ve found to speak about gods without lying.

  • An Agentist Approach to Divinity

    by Ferdinand Pizarro I lend a quasi-religious interpretation to information (order), but I tend to have a more agentist approach to my conception of “god” and/or divinity, which has the effect of providing sufficient interface for approximation of godliness. In other words, I don’t see information as god, but the net production of information (dissipation of entropy) as godliness. Thus those of us who can organize man & matter for the production of order (social, material, aesthetic) are “divine” so-to-speak. Tough subject. I always “feel” a sort of energy from within, a youthful spring, when I contemplate it, and I do so often. I found this in my notes from 2017, which you may clear up some of my hazy thinking by example:

    “The speakers of lies, subverters of truth, producers of confusion, the underminers of trust, the agents of chaos; the primordial enemies of human agency, excellence, beauty & the order that we, The Truthful Ones, impose on the Cosmos by incremental mastery over self, entropy & the human condition—the enemy for short.”

    This is essentially the only way I’ve found to speak about gods without lying.

  • Theology is an attempt to conflate Myth, History, and Law in order to suppress t

    Theology is an attempt to conflate Myth, History, and Law in order to suppress truthful testimony. Most everything else (justification, moralizing, psychologizing, GSRRM) are just various sophisms of deceit.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:39:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167099577796894725

    Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167099217933996039


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz The principle difference between wisdom literatures: history, science, philosophy, wisdom lit (china, india), theology(semitia, europa), and mysticism is in the dimensions of permissible content and operations on it. Philosophy is a derivation of law, and Science of Testimony.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167099217933996039


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz The principle difference between wisdom literatures: history, science, philosophy, wisdom lit (china, india), theology(semitia, europa), and mysticism is in the dimensions of permissible content and operations on it. Philosophy is a derivation of law, and Science of Testimony.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167099217933996039

  • THE UNIVERSE IS GODLESS. THE MIND OF MAN IS NOT How many proposed proposed chris

    THE UNIVERSE IS GODLESS. THE MIND OF MAN IS NOT
    How many proposed proposed christian structures have there been? They’ve all been wrong, right? Instead, we see a largely dead, empty universe,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=456170911646471&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-28 18:07:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1166774431001251841

  • THE UNIVERSE IS GODLESS. THE MIND OF MAN IS NOT How many proposed proposed chris

    THE UNIVERSE IS GODLESS. THE MIND OF MAN IS NOT

    How many proposed proposed christian structures have there been? They’ve all been wrong, right? Instead, we see a largely dead, empty universe, where man is irrelevant, nearly all of which is hostile to life, organized by very simple rules – rules which mean there is no information outside of the universe itself, and nothing exists other than the universe itself, boringly contracting and expanding in time cycles so vast that they are meaningless for any and all life within them and ending any and all life within them. We should se SOME evidence of supernatural power somewhere. instead we see tedious forces of energy in motion desperately trying to exhaust itself.

    GODS EXIST AS INFORMATION


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-28 14:07:00 UTC

  • NO LAW – A VIA NEGATIVA – IS NOT ENOUGH. BUT WHAT RELIGIOUS STRATEGY, NARRATIVE,

    NO LAW – A VIA NEGATIVA – IS NOT ENOUGH. BUT WHAT RELIGIOUS STRATEGY, NARRATIVE, GRAMMAR, AND DEBT ARE SO?
    (important)

    Of the spectrum of Grammars I know of, including but not limited to:… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=455570561706506&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-27 14:04:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1166350676470972417

  • NO LAW – A VIA NEGATIVA – IS NOT ENOUGH. BUT WHAT RELIGIOUS STRATEGY, NARRATIVE,

    NO LAW – A VIA NEGATIVA – IS NOT ENOUGH. BUT WHAT RELIGIOUS STRATEGY, NARRATIVE, GRAMMAR, AND DEBT ARE SO?

    (important)

    Of the spectrum of Grammars I know of, including but not limited to: Supernatural, Mythical, Literary, Ideal, Magical, Pseudoscientific, Fictional, Ordinary Language, Written Language, Testimonial Language, Legal, Economic, Mathematic, Economic (Models), Algorithms, Engineering, Medical Protocols, Accounting, Finance, Logic, Mathematics and Arithmetic:

    a) Both Law and Morality evidentially reflexive and coevolutionary not hierarchical.

    b) Compare:

    Commodity Money (Proper) and Fiat Money,Credit Money, Money Substitutes

    -vs- Law(proper), and Command, Legislation, Regulation, Arbitrary Ruling

    -vs- Morality (Proper), and Institutionalized Morality, Normative Morality, Individual Morality.

    …. and by disambiguation, question just which ‘law’ or ‘morality’ or ‘money’ one is talking about when one makes an argument about the SERIES’ of law, morality, or money. empirically speaking international law is reciprocity, including oath, truth, duty to perform. Because there are no other requirements between those who are neutral or enemies. While within a polity we are cooperating to produce a portfolio of rights(income, credit) and obligations(expense, debt) the disambiguation of which is beyond the abilities of ordinary people other than a vague sense of ‘proportionality’.

    c) People require a group strategy, and a means of reinforcing it a binding narrative for cognitive decidability (altruistic punishment, non conflict, cooperation, signaling). This binding narrative radically decreases the burden of intuitionistic calculation of trust and standardizes ethical(interpersonal) and moral (extrapersonal) permissible and impermissible display word and deed. Without these SYSTEMS OF MEASUREMENT they will continually conflict (as we see with ‘multiculturalism’ as a means of undermining government, culture, tradition, and civilization) and fracture into races, cults, tribes, and clans decreasing group competitive ability (survivability).

    d) As far as I know, Organized religion vs Traditional Religion, evolved to SEPARATE macro (Politically Organized) groups, so that they could separate and compete (Iranic vs Indo Iranic). In other words, just as warfare has moved from military to economic to religious to propaganda in the modern world, warfare moved from military to economic to religious in the age of Transformation.

    e) As far as I know Political Law versus Customary Law evolved in response to governance of heterogeneous people (Middle east), beginning with normalizing punishments to prevent retaliation cycles between clans and tribes with different traditional standards of punishment. In other words, we are more sensitive to differences in punishment (altruistic punishment, especially) than we are to the content of proscribed norms themselves.

    f) As far as I know Historical Mythology serves as mythos (binding narrative) for successful peoples Ancient Europeans and all East asians (and arguably egyptians). Given our new understanding of the origin of middle eastern religion as an evolution of the burial, and it’s nexus as a trade route between the continents, it is easier to understand how pilgrimage, heavens, supernaturalism and authoritarianism evolved in that region amid the continuous wars between so many non-kin. Both christianity and buddhism were forcibly imposed by the governments after multiple failures in order to create a docile populace. In other words, those who need false gods are those who have no worthy ancestors, and have not obtained sufficient control of territory via organization, economics, culture, tradition, and warfare to create an historical mythos and their binding narrative institutions, while those of us who have need no fictitious myths and their binding narrative institutions.

    g) So the question is that given the spectrum of inherited debt-respect from 1- nature, ancestor, hero, founder, nation, in a binding narrative, producing knowledge wisdom and correspondence to reality to 2- Idealism, Literary characters in Character and Role Archetypes and Anthropomorphic Archetypes, to 3- Fantastical, supernatural, non-rational, authoritarian, ignorance-inducing non-correspondence with and active denial of reality.

    h) And so Territorial, Political, Economic, Demographic, Genetic Differences all generate Demand for a Binding Literature of the WEAK, the Powerless, the ABLE, and the POWERFUL – but in no case does this appear to be other than a portfolio of literatures except islam and judaism. In western civilization we have, as most have, relied upon Our ancient Heathen myths (childhood, family), Traditional Myths, Political Religions (formal Myths), Law (social and economic rules), Literary (temporary myths), and Fashions (ever expiring myths). And in western civilization and to a lesser degree in eastern civilization we have done so. The major difference being that the southeast and east were not conquered by Semitic Heterogeneous Political Religions, and preserved their natural religion (and justifiably consider us foolish for ours).

    i) And I cannot tell the difference between the addiction response by a herd of people practicing ritualizing a falsehood despite reality, and a tribe of people and their addiction response TO ONE ANOTHER AND THEIR HISTORY. Other than … that drugs sedate us, and drugs that escape from reality are desirable even if destructive.

    j) As such I will continue my efforts to create the optimum Science, Law, Tradition, Religion for my people and mankind that are the least infected by falsehood and the production of submission, ignorance, vulnerability, and dysgenia. 😉

    Do you see that it’s disambiguation and testimony I practice, and that the outcome of doing so is Natural Law – but what trades and portfolios we construct within that Natural Law’s requirement for reciprocity within the limits of proportionality are infinitely malleable.



    In response to:

    Culture Precedes Law by Troy Camplin

    https://medium.com/@troycamplin/culture-precedes-law-183763eaa861


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-27 10:03:00 UTC

  • The Four Reasons Are 1. God’s silence, 2. God’s inaction, 3. the lack of evidenc

    The Four Reasons Are
    1. God’s silence,
    2. God’s inaction,
    3. the lack of evidence, and
    4. the universe looks exactly like a godless universe would,
    and not at all like a Christian… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=454158935181002&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 22:54:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165396988587859968

  • IMMATERIALITY OF GODS. The Four Reasons Are 1. God’s silence, 2. God’s inaction,

    IMMATERIALITY OF GODS.

    The Four Reasons Are

    1. God’s silence,

    2. God’s inaction,

    3. the lack of evidence, and

    4. the universe looks exactly like a godless universe would,

    and not at all like a Christian universe would, even down to its very structure.

    Of course this is true if you think gods are material beings. If instead you think gods are software distributed in the minds of all of their worshippers, producing synchronicities because of the software, then that’s quite different.

    You see, I talk to my gods all the time, but I don’t have to imagine them as supernatural because I understand that they exist as information and information hosted in a vast distributed computing network called ‘worshippers’ who pay debts to these gods (thanks) in exchange for wisdom and the consequences of wisdom obtained from their counsel.

    Gods exist like numbers exist.

    They do not exist in supernatural form.

    THey’re just information.

    And that is enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 18:54:00 UTC

  • I agree. (And I am a proper heathen(nature) and pagan(ancestors,heroes, archetyp

    I agree. (And I am a proper heathen(nature) and pagan(ancestors,heroes, archetypes). However, I have spent a great deal of time working on the ‘problem’ of christianity and it is possible to reform it – albeit slowly.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-24 17:23:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165313770878623744

    Reply addressees: @ArielFelidae

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165280910402605056


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1165280910402605056