Jan 17, 2020, 10:25 AM Notice that the ten commandments say one may not steal. It does not say one may not free-ride, externalize costs, or steal. But european traditional law is complete not ‘convenient’: it says one may not free ride, externalize, or steal. Notice that the ten commandments say one may not bear false witness. They do not say one may not lie. But European traditional law is complete, not ‘convenient’: it says one may not lie – period. Notice that the ten commandments say nothing about withholding or obscuring information, about “cheating”, about “baiting into hazard”. But european traditional law is complete, not ‘convenient’: it says one must warranty one’s words and deeds against withholding or obscuring information, “cheating”, and “baiting into hazard”. Notice that the ten commandments say nothing about preventing others from free riding, externalizing, fraud, lying, thieving, harm. But european traditional law is complete, not ‘convenient’. It requires we insure by defense, of both the private and common, or we are equally to blame. Notice that Jewish law says one must treat jews reciprocally but may treat non-jews ir-reciprocally. Notice that islamic law says one may only treat muslims reciprocally but may treat non-jews ir-reciprocally. But european traditional law is complete – it grants everyone the same sovereignty. It grants local control to locals. And It prevents externalizing of costs. Non-itegration is a cost. Evangelism and conversion is a crime. Practice that externalizes no costs is no one’s business. So, this is how the Abrahamic method of deceit operates on high trust european minds, by stating very clear half truths that prohibit the obvious and trivial, but by doing so license the subtle, and egregious – it’s moral hand-waving to distract you. The Abrahamic technique of false promise, hiding behind moral pretense, under cover of plausible deniability, defended by sophistry is as ADVANCED a method of DECEPTION against high trust european people, as REASON, EMPIRICISM, and SCIENCE are a method of falsification of the ignorance, error, bias, and deceits of low trust non-european people Once you see it you can’t unsee it. You see it everywhere. In ever sentence. Everything the enemy says is that sounds anything like truth is always and everywhere a half truth obscuring a lie – or it wouldn’t be said. The only problem we face is our own religion is still infected with pilpul and dogma when imitating Jesus’ love and presuming god’s love is all that is necessary. There is nothing else to be said. Christianity asks us to create a universal family by extending familial love to all that we can possibly do so in good conscience. In doing so, we create the optimum extended high trust, and trustworthy family. This is the common person’s version of Hellenic, Italic, Germanic civilization’s political strategy in the language of the weak, women and children.
Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology
-
The Ten Commandments vs European Traditional Law Demonstrate the Abrahamic Method of Deceit.
Jan 17, 2020, 10:25 AM Notice that the ten commandments say one may not steal. It does not say one may not free-ride, externalize costs, or steal. But european traditional law is complete not ‘convenient’: it says one may not free ride, externalize, or steal. Notice that the ten commandments say one may not bear false witness. They do not say one may not lie. But European traditional law is complete, not ‘convenient’: it says one may not lie – period. Notice that the ten commandments say nothing about withholding or obscuring information, about “cheating”, about “baiting into hazard”. But european traditional law is complete, not ‘convenient’: it says one must warranty one’s words and deeds against withholding or obscuring information, “cheating”, and “baiting into hazard”. Notice that the ten commandments say nothing about preventing others from free riding, externalizing, fraud, lying, thieving, harm. But european traditional law is complete, not ‘convenient’. It requires we insure by defense, of both the private and common, or we are equally to blame. Notice that Jewish law says one must treat jews reciprocally but may treat non-jews ir-reciprocally. Notice that islamic law says one may only treat muslims reciprocally but may treat non-jews ir-reciprocally. But european traditional law is complete – it grants everyone the same sovereignty. It grants local control to locals. And It prevents externalizing of costs. Non-itegration is a cost. Evangelism and conversion is a crime. Practice that externalizes no costs is no one’s business. So, this is how the Abrahamic method of deceit operates on high trust european minds, by stating very clear half truths that prohibit the obvious and trivial, but by doing so license the subtle, and egregious – it’s moral hand-waving to distract you. The Abrahamic technique of false promise, hiding behind moral pretense, under cover of plausible deniability, defended by sophistry is as ADVANCED a method of DECEPTION against high trust european people, as REASON, EMPIRICISM, and SCIENCE are a method of falsification of the ignorance, error, bias, and deceits of low trust non-european people Once you see it you can’t unsee it. You see it everywhere. In ever sentence. Everything the enemy says is that sounds anything like truth is always and everywhere a half truth obscuring a lie – or it wouldn’t be said. The only problem we face is our own religion is still infected with pilpul and dogma when imitating Jesus’ love and presuming god’s love is all that is necessary. There is nothing else to be said. Christianity asks us to create a universal family by extending familial love to all that we can possibly do so in good conscience. In doing so, we create the optimum extended high trust, and trustworthy family. This is the common person’s version of Hellenic, Italic, Germanic civilization’s political strategy in the language of the weak, women and children.
-
Questions from Elsewhere
Jan 21, 2020, 8:51 PM QUESTIONS FROM ELSEWHERE
—“Hi, I’ve been reading your blog. I want to know how Marxism and the push for communism was related to abrahamism. iirc Marxism tried to oppress islam and Christianity in Europe, so how does it relate to abrahamism? – possibly through Judaism? or simply commonalities with the religions it opposed? thank you for clarifying! i’m interested in your topics and want to better understand.”—
Abrahamism is a technique for organizing ideas into persuasive form, like platonic idealism, Aristotelian reason, or confucian wisdom. The difference is that it’s meant to deceive. Marxism is argued using the abrahamic technique.
—“Ok, thanks! And, if it’s not too much trouble, I have other questions I’d like to ask you… 1) Who would you vote for in the US presidential election this year? – and – 2) You stated that it’s good for all races to reduce their ‘underclass’. Please define underclass? – and -2b how would you respond to people who think that the white birth rate must go up regardless of parents’ status?”—
1) I will vote for whatever not-democrat is running, so I assume that will be Trump. 2) Underclass is any group of people (a) unable to hold a family unit, (b) unable to produce offspring without subsidy from others (c) unable or unwilling to adapt to western (american) middle class manners, ethics, and morals, and probably (d) (implied) unable to adapt to christian ethics whether supernatural or secular. 3) (a) It is not clear at all that birth rates need to go up so much as we need to prevent immigrants, start work earlier and end it later and increase automation, and implement the financial reforms I’ve suggested that vastly reduce economic challenges and differences, so that only a single income is NECESSARY for the survival of a replacement rate family. (b) It’s more important that we end the demand for the absolute nuclear family and instead, restore the intergenerational family even if it means restoring intergenerational households. This includes reforming the marriage laws to make people liable once again for interference in a marriage etc. (c) and restore libel, and slander (defamation) and extend it to undermining of our traditions.
-
Questions from Elsewhere
Jan 21, 2020, 8:51 PM QUESTIONS FROM ELSEWHERE
—“Hi, I’ve been reading your blog. I want to know how Marxism and the push for communism was related to abrahamism. iirc Marxism tried to oppress islam and Christianity in Europe, so how does it relate to abrahamism? – possibly through Judaism? or simply commonalities with the religions it opposed? thank you for clarifying! i’m interested in your topics and want to better understand.”—
Abrahamism is a technique for organizing ideas into persuasive form, like platonic idealism, Aristotelian reason, or confucian wisdom. The difference is that it’s meant to deceive. Marxism is argued using the abrahamic technique.
—“Ok, thanks! And, if it’s not too much trouble, I have other questions I’d like to ask you… 1) Who would you vote for in the US presidential election this year? – and – 2) You stated that it’s good for all races to reduce their ‘underclass’. Please define underclass? – and -2b how would you respond to people who think that the white birth rate must go up regardless of parents’ status?”—
1) I will vote for whatever not-democrat is running, so I assume that will be Trump. 2) Underclass is any group of people (a) unable to hold a family unit, (b) unable to produce offspring without subsidy from others (c) unable or unwilling to adapt to western (american) middle class manners, ethics, and morals, and probably (d) (implied) unable to adapt to christian ethics whether supernatural or secular. 3) (a) It is not clear at all that birth rates need to go up so much as we need to prevent immigrants, start work earlier and end it later and increase automation, and implement the financial reforms I’ve suggested that vastly reduce economic challenges and differences, so that only a single income is NECESSARY for the survival of a replacement rate family. (b) It’s more important that we end the demand for the absolute nuclear family and instead, restore the intergenerational family even if it means restoring intergenerational households. This includes reforming the marriage laws to make people liable once again for interference in a marriage etc. (c) and restore libel, and slander (defamation) and extend it to undermining of our traditions.
-
Abrahamism Is as Advanced a Method of Deceit as Aristotelianism Is an Advanced T
Abrahamism Is as Advanced a Method of Deceit as Aristotelianism Is an Advanced Technique of Truth Telling https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/abrahamism-is-as-advanced-a-method-of-deceit-as-aristotelianism-is-an-advanced-technique-of-truth-telling/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 19:45:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265006007077556231
-
Abrahamism Is as Advanced a Method of Deceit as Aristotelianism Is an Advanced Technique of Truth Telling
Jan 22, 2020, 9:21 AM ABRAHAMISM IS AS ADVANCED A METHOD OF DECEIT AS ARISTOTELIANISM IS AN ADVANCED TECHNIQUE OF TRUTH TELLING Abrahamism is a technique for organizing ideas into persuasive form, like Socratic Falsificationism, Platonic Idealism, Aristotelian Reason (testimony), Confucian wisdom (advice) – the only system of thought in the world that even came close to the European. The difference is that Abrahamism meant to deceive. Marxism is argued using the Abrahamic technique. So are cultural marxism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism, and neoconservatism. So are judaism, christianity, and Islam. It’s the most advanced form of lying ever invented by man, much as science is the most advanced form of truth telling ever invented by man. I’ve spent over a decade working on articulating the grammars (rules) of Aristotelian Truth and Abrahamic Deceit. So likewise, Islam is not primitive. It’s not a religion. It’s an informational and behavioral virus. It is the most advanced application of the most advanced system of deception ever invented by man – and causes the destruction, ignorance, decline, and dysgenia that results in everything it touches. Marxism, Socialism, Postmodernism, Feminism, libertarianism, neoconservatism, and the denialism we call political correctness, are simply the application of the abrahamic method of deceit yet again destroy civilization from within by destruction of the human information system (“Social Construction”), using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), critique (undermining, conflict generation), avoidance of warranty, under plausible deniability, to profit from the destruction of a civilization, including genetic, cultural, institutional, economic, informational, and aesthetic capital. (worth repeating)
-
Abrahamism Is as Advanced a Method of Deceit as Aristotelianism Is an Advanced Technique of Truth Telling
Jan 22, 2020, 9:21 AM ABRAHAMISM IS AS ADVANCED A METHOD OF DECEIT AS ARISTOTELIANISM IS AN ADVANCED TECHNIQUE OF TRUTH TELLING Abrahamism is a technique for organizing ideas into persuasive form, like Socratic Falsificationism, Platonic Idealism, Aristotelian Reason (testimony), Confucian wisdom (advice) – the only system of thought in the world that even came close to the European. The difference is that Abrahamism meant to deceive. Marxism is argued using the Abrahamic technique. So are cultural marxism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism, and neoconservatism. So are judaism, christianity, and Islam. It’s the most advanced form of lying ever invented by man, much as science is the most advanced form of truth telling ever invented by man. I’ve spent over a decade working on articulating the grammars (rules) of Aristotelian Truth and Abrahamic Deceit. So likewise, Islam is not primitive. It’s not a religion. It’s an informational and behavioral virus. It is the most advanced application of the most advanced system of deception ever invented by man – and causes the destruction, ignorance, decline, and dysgenia that results in everything it touches. Marxism, Socialism, Postmodernism, Feminism, libertarianism, neoconservatism, and the denialism we call political correctness, are simply the application of the abrahamic method of deceit yet again destroy civilization from within by destruction of the human information system (“Social Construction”), using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), critique (undermining, conflict generation), avoidance of warranty, under plausible deniability, to profit from the destruction of a civilization, including genetic, cultural, institutional, economic, informational, and aesthetic capital. (worth repeating)
-
Islam vs Communism Similarities and Differences
Islam vs Communism Similarities and Differences https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/islam-vs-communism-similarities-and-differences/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 19:40:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265004889144516609
-
Islam vs Communism Similarities and Differences
Jan 22, 2020, 1:20 PM by Simon Ström Unlike Communism, Islam rejects progressivism in the familial domain. I think the deeper meaning of your statement above is, that after three generations of Communism, you have an inevitably stagnant society and a disillusioned, nihilistic population. Whereas after n generations of Islam, you also have an inevitably stagnant society, but a political system that also functions as a stable group-evolutionary strategy for its inhabitants, which reinforces its perpetuation. Every Muslim is born such, and remains personally invested in Islam, whereas most citizens of a Communist state are indifferent (at best) to Communism per se.
-
Islam vs Communism Similarities and Differences
Jan 22, 2020, 1:20 PM by Simon Ström Unlike Communism, Islam rejects progressivism in the familial domain. I think the deeper meaning of your statement above is, that after three generations of Communism, you have an inevitably stagnant society and a disillusioned, nihilistic population. Whereas after n generations of Islam, you also have an inevitably stagnant society, but a political system that also functions as a stable group-evolutionary strategy for its inhabitants, which reinforces its perpetuation. Every Muslim is born such, and remains personally invested in Islam, whereas most citizens of a Communist state are indifferent (at best) to Communism per se.