The Most Important Lesson from The Church Experience https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/the-most-important-lesson-from-the-church-experience/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 16:13:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265677433384165376
Oct 25, 2019, 10:02 AM The most important lesson I’ve observed, and perhaps the most important, is that sitting still in church, and the social pressure of sitting still in church, no matter how hard it is, teaches us the meaning of ‘sacred’ which is ‘we have no rights of self fulfillment’. I think it is underrated, how much the respect we demonstrate for one another in religious ceremony translates to how we ALWAYS act in the commons – and I think the loss of this ‘sacredness’ and this training in the ‘submission’ by develops ‘agency’ over impulses such that we do not impose so many costs of self expression (hyper-consumption) on the commons and therefore the polity. You do know what group did this right? What one group undermined it? I do.
Oct 25, 2019, 10:02 AM The most important lesson I’ve observed, and perhaps the most important, is that sitting still in church, and the social pressure of sitting still in church, no matter how hard it is, teaches us the meaning of ‘sacred’ which is ‘we have no rights of self fulfillment’. I think it is underrated, how much the respect we demonstrate for one another in religious ceremony translates to how we ALWAYS act in the commons – and I think the loss of this ‘sacredness’ and this training in the ‘submission’ by develops ‘agency’ over impulses such that we do not impose so many costs of self expression (hyper-consumption) on the commons and therefore the polity. You do know what group did this right? What one group undermined it? I do.
Why Is Curt Going Easy on Religion Now? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/why-is-curt-going-easy-on-religion-now/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 16:11:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265677017149837314
Oct 25, 2019, 11:33 AM The reason I’m more accommodating lately is because my work on investigating religion, education, and government is done, it’s just a matter of updating the constitution, switching our daily discourse to advocacy of that constitution and it’s solutions. I’m sorry having your sacred cows questioned so aggressively (prosecutorally) whether theological, philosophical, sophomoric, normative, or pseudoscientific was painful – but that’s what prosecutors do: falsify everything possible so that only the truth remains. Once the truth is understood, then we can search for compromises while motioning the truth between us. This is what we all need, and it’s a condition we all prefer, but we are always trying to ‘get a better deal by hook or by crook’ and sorry – everything is a reciprocal exchange.
Oct 25, 2019, 11:33 AM The reason I’m more accommodating lately is because my work on investigating religion, education, and government is done, it’s just a matter of updating the constitution, switching our daily discourse to advocacy of that constitution and it’s solutions. I’m sorry having your sacred cows questioned so aggressively (prosecutorally) whether theological, philosophical, sophomoric, normative, or pseudoscientific was painful – but that’s what prosecutors do: falsify everything possible so that only the truth remains. Once the truth is understood, then we can search for compromises while motioning the truth between us. This is what we all need, and it’s a condition we all prefer, but we are always trying to ‘get a better deal by hook or by crook’ and sorry – everything is a reciprocal exchange.
Oct 29, 2019, 12:35 PM (possibly offensive) (necessary for preservation of christianity in european civlization) (the ‘harsh words’ for christians unwilling to accept the compromise with their scientific, rational, moral(traditional), non-theological christian peers.
—“Modern Christianity just isn’t compatible with your ideas and will be a weak point if you adopt them. Christian concept of love and forgiveness is truly at odds. Islamic religion are far more inline with your concept. Eye for an eye is a neutral concept, restriction of free speech like lying, punishment for traitorous speech (their blasphemy concept), self defense of property and life is encouraged, rejection of debauchery is absolute and host of other issue make Islam superior for nation building. If you must hold onto Christianity, the older roots of christianity will work the best.”— Jay Smith
Aside from the fact that you claim wisdom, knowledge, understanding, that you do not possess, or you would argue both sides and compare them, I think I have studied this subject as thoroughly as anyone in history with the least tolerance for lies from either side. We can accommodate christianity because christianity is compatible with the natural law, and european high trust peoples compatible with christian tolerance and charity – to a point. But christianity has failed in the ancient, medieval, and modern world to solve the problem of politics, and at present universalist christianity and christians are hostile enemies of western civlization. So if instead we limit Christian tolerance to “our own’ and prevent Christians from lying to themselves that they are doing good by helping others than their own – virtue signaling, not doing good. And if we can embody natural law and christian tolerance (love) in the constitution, then we can eliminate the evils of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, judaism and islam, that seek to destroy our civilization, and maintain scientific, rational, moral, and theological strains of christian thought. I understand. You want to promote the lie that faith is truth so that you don’t have to work so hard at preserving your faith. I understand that. But it just means your a liar, a parasite, and a thief, and you have no faith if you cannot accept both the truth AND faith together. If you cannot, then you have no faith. you are just a liar – no different from a drug addict making excuses for your addition to your lies. We can no longer tolerate cancerous Christians. Either have faith, truth, and honor and duty, or you are not a Christian or a European you are just another useful idiot of the enemy, and a cancer undermining western civilization. Faith is not incompatible with truth unless you have no faith. If you cannot bear truthful christianity, rational christianity, moral (traditional) christianity, and theological christianity together, you are no christian. You are just a selfish, lying, parasite, and an enemy of our people.
Oct 29, 2019, 12:35 PM (possibly offensive) (necessary for preservation of christianity in european civlization) (the ‘harsh words’ for christians unwilling to accept the compromise with their scientific, rational, moral(traditional), non-theological christian peers.
—“Modern Christianity just isn’t compatible with your ideas and will be a weak point if you adopt them. Christian concept of love and forgiveness is truly at odds. Islamic religion are far more inline with your concept. Eye for an eye is a neutral concept, restriction of free speech like lying, punishment for traitorous speech (their blasphemy concept), self defense of property and life is encouraged, rejection of debauchery is absolute and host of other issue make Islam superior for nation building. If you must hold onto Christianity, the older roots of christianity will work the best.”— Jay Smith
Aside from the fact that you claim wisdom, knowledge, understanding, that you do not possess, or you would argue both sides and compare them, I think I have studied this subject as thoroughly as anyone in history with the least tolerance for lies from either side. We can accommodate christianity because christianity is compatible with the natural law, and european high trust peoples compatible with christian tolerance and charity – to a point. But christianity has failed in the ancient, medieval, and modern world to solve the problem of politics, and at present universalist christianity and christians are hostile enemies of western civlization. So if instead we limit Christian tolerance to “our own’ and prevent Christians from lying to themselves that they are doing good by helping others than their own – virtue signaling, not doing good. And if we can embody natural law and christian tolerance (love) in the constitution, then we can eliminate the evils of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, judaism and islam, that seek to destroy our civilization, and maintain scientific, rational, moral, and theological strains of christian thought. I understand. You want to promote the lie that faith is truth so that you don’t have to work so hard at preserving your faith. I understand that. But it just means your a liar, a parasite, and a thief, and you have no faith if you cannot accept both the truth AND faith together. If you cannot, then you have no faith. you are just a liar – no different from a drug addict making excuses for your addition to your lies. We can no longer tolerate cancerous Christians. Either have faith, truth, and honor and duty, or you are not a Christian or a European you are just another useful idiot of the enemy, and a cancer undermining western civilization. Faith is not incompatible with truth unless you have no faith. If you cannot bear truthful christianity, rational christianity, moral (traditional) christianity, and theological christianity together, you are no christian. You are just a selfish, lying, parasite, and an enemy of our people.
You Don’t Get It Do You? (restoring Religion) https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/you-dont-get-it-do-you-restoring-religion/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 15:42:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265669758906744832
Oct 29, 2019, 4:53 PM (Luke does) If we can find a way to unite the secular, rational, traditional, and feminine theological christian, and masculine mythological pagan under natural law, heroic virtues, and christian ethics, we can restore the church(es) to the central position in our civilization and restore the civil society, with common everything except grammar of expression.