Curt Doolittle

Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

  • What Christianity Provided

    May 26, 2020, 11:58 AM Yes, I agree with holland – in part. Even if he more of a fiction writer than a historian. Quoting myself: lol

    “Christianity provided a system of status and virtue for those without means, which in turn created a market for affection (by women) that could create demand for those ethics from men. But it came at a high cost that persisted the dark ages: it was counter to our traditional aristocratic military and legal traditions, religions, and the reverse of our understanding of our relation to the world and our gods. And so, while the new decidedly feminine virtues were added, the entire semitic system of thought conflicted with european thought. It was the competition between aristocracy, the law, and the faith that defined our civlization in bronze, iron, mediterranean, dark, continental, and colonial ages. The reintroduction of aristotle re-harmonized our thinking, and all that remains is completing the restoration of our ancestral aristocratic thought, while maintaining our christian values by restating christianity in the language of our civlization: our law, our science, our philosophy, and a purely scientific and rational faith in ourselves as gods in the making.”

  • Women Creating a Market for Male Virtues

    May 26, 2020, 11:29 PM by Michael Churchill Been thinking more about the concept that Christianity created a market for male virtue that was administered by women.

    • As Christianity became the dominant religion, men were bent into women’s moral frame. This became more pronounced with universal suffrage — and took another step-function higher with universal wealth beginning in the 1960s and 70s.

    • Thus today in wealthy countries the moral frame is almost completely dictated by women. Is that natural? It doesn’t seem so. Clearly it is un-competitive civilizationally, as reflected in plunging European birthrates (compared to Africa and Middle East in particular).

    • What REALLY was the moral frame in pre-Christian times. Women must have had a fair amount of moral sway in Rome, for instance. It was a very sophisticated place and women are the glue that holds communities together.

    • And … how “cool” was it to act psychopathically toward other people back in Roman times? Do we really know? If the man of the house was boinking the slave girl would his wife really have no say in the matter?

  • Women Creating a Market for Male Virtues

    May 26, 2020, 11:29 PM by Michael Churchill Been thinking more about the concept that Christianity created a market for male virtue that was administered by women.

    • As Christianity became the dominant religion, men were bent into women’s moral frame. This became more pronounced with universal suffrage — and took another step-function higher with universal wealth beginning in the 1960s and 70s.

    • Thus today in wealthy countries the moral frame is almost completely dictated by women. Is that natural? It doesn’t seem so. Clearly it is un-competitive civilizationally, as reflected in plunging European birthrates (compared to Africa and Middle East in particular).

    • What REALLY was the moral frame in pre-Christian times. Women must have had a fair amount of moral sway in Rome, for instance. It was a very sophisticated place and women are the glue that holds communities together.

    • And … how “cool” was it to act psychopathically toward other people back in Roman times? Do we really know? If the man of the house was boinking the slave girl would his wife really have no say in the matter?

  • Why Were Christians Justly Prosecuted (and Why Aren’t Marxist-Pomos?)

    Why Were Christians Justly Prosecuted (and Why Aren’t Marxist-Pomos?) https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/why-were-christians-justly-prosecuted-and-why-arent-marxist-pomos/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 02:58:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265839852932730880

  • Why Were Christians Justly Prosecuted (and Why Aren’t Marxist-Pomos?)

    May 26, 2020, 11:31 PM RELIGION Martyrs were killed because: (a) they would not demonstrate even token loyalty to the empire – instead disloyalty and treason. (b) they were considered atheists (god deniers) and impious in an era where pleasing the gods was considered necessary. (c) they were spreading a falsehood that tacitus correctly called a ‘mischievous superstition’. (d) the religion they were spreading was a hatred of the human race, and of life and joy itself. (e) the religion they were spreading put itself above reality and the state rather than a peerage to reality and the state. (f) they were fomenting an underclass rebellion against the empire’s demonstrated benefits the majority valued with a false promise of supernatural benefits of a hostile minority. (g) they were creating conflict between sects and forenting social unrest. (h)they were reversing the aryan program of incremental domestication of the underclasses and the gradual earning of freedom, liberty, and sovereignty (privilege) creating peers in a majority “middle class” (propertied) civilization. They were rightly considered anti social and treasonous. Just as we rightly consider the ((())) marxists, postmodernists, feminists, hbd-denialists, and anti-traditionalists, ant-moralists, anti-martialists, anti-familists, and sexual deviants today as a means of undermining the aristocracy. The romans were far too kind, have been far too kind during the middle ages, and just as we are far too kind today. They should have exterminated them to the last man woman and child. And in doing so saved europe from the dark ages.

  • Why Were Christians Justly Prosecuted (and Why Aren’t Marxist-Pomos?)

    May 26, 2020, 11:31 PM RELIGION Martyrs were killed because: (a) they would not demonstrate even token loyalty to the empire – instead disloyalty and treason. (b) they were considered atheists (god deniers) and impious in an era where pleasing the gods was considered necessary. (c) they were spreading a falsehood that tacitus correctly called a ‘mischievous superstition’. (d) the religion they were spreading was a hatred of the human race, and of life and joy itself. (e) the religion they were spreading put itself above reality and the state rather than a peerage to reality and the state. (f) they were fomenting an underclass rebellion against the empire’s demonstrated benefits the majority valued with a false promise of supernatural benefits of a hostile minority. (g) they were creating conflict between sects and forenting social unrest. (h)they were reversing the aryan program of incremental domestication of the underclasses and the gradual earning of freedom, liberty, and sovereignty (privilege) creating peers in a majority “middle class” (propertied) civilization. They were rightly considered anti social and treasonous. Just as we rightly consider the ((())) marxists, postmodernists, feminists, hbd-denialists, and anti-traditionalists, ant-moralists, anti-martialists, anti-familists, and sexual deviants today as a means of undermining the aristocracy. The romans were far too kind, have been far too kind during the middle ages, and just as we are far too kind today. They should have exterminated them to the last man woman and child. And in doing so saved europe from the dark ages.

  • Jesus He Didn’t Bring Down Judaism, He Advanced It

    Jesus He Didn’t Bring Down Judaism, He Advanced It. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/jesus-he-didnt-bring-down-judaism-he-advanced-it/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 18:00:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265704373646213122

  • Jesus He Didn’t Bring Down Judaism, He Advanced It.

    Oct 8, 2019, 1:39 PM Jesus he didn’t bring down judaism, he advanced it.

    1. Judaism to undermine the masculine aristocracy.
    2. Christianity to feminize the population into submission
    3. Islam to raid, conquer, destroy and consume all capital.

    The three stages of abrahamic warfare against the indo european peoples. The restoration of the dysgenic feminine equalitarian strategy against the invention of eugenic, masculine egalitarian hierarchy.

  • Jesus He Didn’t Bring Down Judaism, He Advanced It.

    Oct 8, 2019, 1:39 PM Jesus he didn’t bring down judaism, he advanced it.

    1. Judaism to undermine the masculine aristocracy.
    2. Christianity to feminize the population into submission
    3. Islam to raid, conquer, destroy and consume all capital.

    The three stages of abrahamic warfare against the indo european peoples. The restoration of the dysgenic feminine equalitarian strategy against the invention of eugenic, masculine egalitarian hierarchy.

  • Science Philosophy and Religion – the Production of Mindfulness Given Our Agency

    Science Philosophy and Religion – the Production of Mindfulness Given Our Agency https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/science-philosophy-and-religion-the-production-of-mindfulness-given-our-agency/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 17:59:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265704275293999106