Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology

I AM AND P IS NOT ANTI-CHRISTIAN – BUT ANTI-ABRAHAMIC.

1. I am not anti christian, I’m a jeffersonian Christian. Meaning jesus was a philosopher speaking in the language of parables that his people could understand. So jesus spoke in their wisdom literature: Abrahamism (false promise to obtain obedience). It may have been all he knew. But his lesson can be disentangled from the Abrahamic Deceit he preached with, just like it can be translated from Aramaic into Greek, Roman, Latins, Germanic, and English.

As for God, I may intuit deism, but in my job as a judge I cannot testify to it, and all evidence continues the trend of a universe lacking any agent.

As for My god, it’s definitely the god of my people: tiwaz, tyr, odin/thor, zeus, jupiter, an I ‘worship’ a lot of ‘gods’.

Why? Because our civilization has always been trifunctional: War, Law, and Faith. And My priority is War, Law, Faith. Because that is the hierarchy of dependency. Others don’t have this priority – because THEY CAN”T DO IT. I understand. But all of us have this set of priorities. We just don’t sit down and educate ourselves on our priorities and the moral intuitions that result from them.

2. Nor is P anti-Christian. In P, Jesus extended natural law into a via-positiva. That’s SCIENCE. This means Jesus is in the pantheon of European heroes – as a Philosopher. And philosophers are worthy of worship (respect). Because all gods of all sorts that we worship consist of information and they produce behaviors in us just as if they were still among us.

3. I am and P is, anti-Abrahamic, which to a Christian means anti-theological, anti-supernatural. To supernatural Christians, this is a contradiction. To those of us who seek only wisdom, it’s not the supernaturalists who practice contradictions. This is the conflict between Law and Faith. When faith claims theology, reason, and argument, and intrudes on truth and the law rather than faith.

4. I have contempt for Christians but my contempt isn’t for Jesus. It’s for cowards hiding behind his skirts while claiming virtue. Jesus didn’t hide. Jesus showed up. And he took the hit. I don’t see (many) xians showing up. I see them undermining – like leftists.

5. I have contempt for cowardice and most of Christianity that is visible to me is cowardly. Now I don’t care if you believe in magic if it doesn’t affect business, economics, politics, or war. I don’t really care of you abandon reality and live in a primitive fictional drama world – if you still show up for work and get the job done. And I don’t care what reason you choose to show up and fight for your people.

6. But so far, all I see from Christians is “I wanna play by magic rules or I’m gonna go home and help Rome Fall Again.” So instead I challenge Christians to prove historians wrong: prove that Christians weren’t responsible for the fall and failure to restore Rome. Weren’t responsible for the dark ages of ignorance and superstition. And instead man up, shut up, and show up.

7. I’m contemptuous of those who seek refuge on the right among men who put action in reality and joy of life before doing nothing, and worship of death. You hide behind Christian skirts, hide behind better men’s bravery, hide behind better men’s achievements, and do nothing except demand coddling like women.

8. I’m contemptuous of deniers, liars and sophists that were responsible for undermining the ancient world, and responsible aiding our enemies in our current condition. Christians have been communists for all of history. The only reason they bend Right is Marxism-Postmodernism a more influential cult. They shifted from supernatural false promise after death, to pseudoscientific false promise after revolution in the present world.

9. I’m contemptuous of pretense that the Christian alliance with the right hasn’t been a disaster – Christians aren’t Right – they oppose the right. They always have. Church-Christianity (Churchanity) is the counter-revolution against the martial aristocracy. They’re historically and presently leftists. They use the female means of disapproval. They use the female means of argument. They put approval before truth. they put conformity before adaptability. They put safety and security before achievement. They don’t show for defense of the polity, don’t show for counter-protests.

10. Islamism is a better historical supernatural religion of undermining host peoples, and Marxism is a better present pseudoscientific version of Judaism. Postmodernism and political correctness are just a better present version of Christianity. But fundamentally, whether you practice Islam or Islamism, Judaism or marxism, Christianity or postmodernism, you are still practicing the female method of undermining, and the Abrahamic method of deceit to do it.

11. The weak will turn on us no matter what we do. and as we have seen the majority of those that turn on us are Christians, because Christianity uses the same values and techniques as the left.

12. There is nothing that will bring Christians other than the cover of men who don’t put religion first but people and results first. If the dominance of faith must be greater than the dominance of people first, the dominance of law second, and faith third, then these people are merely walking hand mental grenades (I was just in a revolution. You know who fights? Men who like fighting. You know who those men hide among for cover? Christians chanting.)

13. I must break the concept that I am P. I am not, any more than darwin was evolution, einstein relativity. I just discovered it. I am not someone the grunts will follow. worse, I can be destroyed like every other ‘leader’. P cannot be a heroic leader cult no matter how badly people want it. It has to be an idea. That idea is pretty simple and concrete now.

14. We must attract men who will act for the policies, and let the others fill in if we have the numbers. A popular movement is impossible. A ‘loyalty’ (elite) movement is possible, and the grunts will follow the elites if there are numbers.

15. We need to recruit ‘a few good men’ and say what that means. That few good men needs to be ‘enough’.

Truth is enough. And I cannot compromise on the truth.