Of course I did. You just can’t grasp it. Christian ethics aren’t irreciprocal in and of themselves – they’re costs born so can’t be. Meekness isn’t irreciprocal in and of itself, it’s self skepticism. The irreciprocity is produced by the abrahamic method of deceit.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Category: Religion, Myth, and Theology
-
Of course I did. You just can’t grasp it. Christian ethics aren’t irreciprocal i
-
7. As such, the conversion of Jesus’ teaching – the Europeanization of it to rat
7. As such, the conversion of Jesus’ teaching – the Europeanization of it to rational philosophy, legal and economic science – is a useful contribution to european natural law of reciprocity.
-
6. My criticism of Christianity is that the means of indoctrination into (a) the
6. My criticism of Christianity is that the means of indoctrination into (a) the empathic imitation of Jesus treatment of others, or (b) the rational adoption of the scientific statement of those ethics, (c) relies upon and teaches the Abrahamic method of deceit (and ignorance).
-
5. As such a scientific statement of the Christian ethic is both compatible with
5. As such a scientific statement of the Christian ethic is both compatible with natural law and the only known via-positiva enhancement of it. (And the optimum advice (philosophy) for the weak, the dim, and the meek is to follow that strategy because they will do least harm.)
-
7. As such, the conversion of Jesus’ teaching – the Europeanization of it to rat
7. As such, the conversion of Jesus’ teaching – the Europeanization of it to rational philosophy, legal and economic science – is a useful contribution to european natural law of reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 19:30:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837503917920256
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837502319853575
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
6. My criticism of Christianity is that the means of indoctrination into (a) the empathic imitation of Jesus treatment of others, or (b) the rational adoption of the scientific statement of those ethics, (c) relies upon and teaches the Abrahamic method of deceit (and ignorance).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312837502319853575
-
6. My criticism of Christianity is that the means of indoctrination into (a) the
6. My criticism of Christianity is that the means of indoctrination into (a) the empathic imitation of Jesus treatment of others, or (b) the rational adoption of the scientific statement of those ethics, (c) relies upon and teaches the Abrahamic method of deceit (and ignorance).
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 19:30:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837502319853575
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837500763865088
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
5. As such a scientific statement of the Christian ethic is both compatible with natural law and the only known via-positiva enhancement of it. (And the optimum advice (philosophy) for the weak, the dim, and the meek is to follow that strategy because they will do least harm.)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312837500763865088
-
5. As such a scientific statement of the Christian ethic is both compatible with
5. As such a scientific statement of the Christian ethic is both compatible with natural law and the only known via-positiva enhancement of it. (And the optimum advice (philosophy) for the weak, the dim, and the meek is to follow that strategy because they will do least harm.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 19:30:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837500763865088
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837499140661249
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
4. This optimum strategy is not evident in the test of reciprocity which is a via-negativa science of what not to do. It is counter-intuitive, and non-obvious (and therefore unique) to EMPIRICALLY exhaust forgiveness of another INDIVIDUAL before determining that effort futile.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312837499140661249
-
2. (a)Eradication of hatred from the human heart. (b)The extension of kinship lo
2. (a)Eradication of hatred from the human heart. (b)The extension of kinship love to kindred, (c)The demand for personal acts of charity to do so. (d)The exhaustion of forgiveness in pursuit of cooperation, before boycott, ostracization, punishment, or war.
-
0. I can’t figure out why this is so hard to understand, or if people are willfu
0. I can’t figure out why this is so hard to understand, or if people are willfully ignorant, or addictively deceptive (in denialism).
1. Christian ethics can be stated scientifically and I have done so. … https://t.co/Zj0xxTsuff -
2. (a)Eradication of hatred from the human heart. (b)The extension of kinship lo
2. (a)Eradication of hatred from the human heart. (b)The extension of kinship love to kindred, (c)The demand for personal acts of charity to do so. (d)The exhaustion of forgiveness in pursuit of cooperation, before boycott, ostracization, punishment, or war.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 19:30:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837495638364161
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837493360930818
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
0. I can’t figure out why this is so hard to understand, or if people are willfully ignorant, or addictively deceptive (in denialism).
1. Christian ethics can be stated scientifically and I have done so. … https://twitter.com/bishkebab4/status/1312791345015091200Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312837493360930818